What is the plural TO / OF somethingexperience at/in/on high school levels“Not until” and “by”Write plural of/to the following wordsIs there any difference between “changing mind on something” and “changing mind about something”On the end of somethingwhen to use 'for' in this case?“do to” vs. “do with”“sort of” vs. “a sort of”In the field or on the field?Why is it 'a ticket _to_ the cinema' but 'a ticket _for_ a/the concert'?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Generic TVP tradeoffs?

Synchronized implementation of a bank account in Java

Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Loading the leaflet Map in Lightning Web Component

Should I use acronyms in dialogues before telling the readers what it stands for in fiction?

Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents

Why is there so much iron?

Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

Unfrosted light bulb

How to get the n-th line after a grepped one?

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived​?

Probably overheated black color SMD pads

Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula

Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell?

HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive failures

두음법칙 - When did North and South diverge in pronunciation of initial ㄹ?

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

Optimising a list searching algorithm



What is the plural TO / OF something


experience at/in/on high school levels“Not until” and “by”Write plural of/to the following wordsIs there any difference between “changing mind on something” and “changing mind about something”On the end of somethingwhen to use 'for' in this case?“do to” vs. “do with”“sort of” vs. “a sort of”In the field or on the field?Why is it 'a ticket _to_ the cinema' but 'a ticket _for_ a/the concert'?













3
















What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?









share



















  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    16 hours ago















3
















What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?









share



















  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    16 hours ago













3












3








3


1







What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?









share

















What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?







prepositions grammaticality-in-context





share














share












share



share








edited 9 hours ago









jwodder

13714




13714










asked 21 hours ago









Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

398112




398112







  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    16 hours ago












  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    16 hours ago







2




2





Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

– userr2684291
16 hours ago





Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

– userr2684291
16 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9














It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer























  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    20 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    20 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    20 hours ago


















3















"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    12 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    11 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    11 hours ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200923%2fwhat-is-the-plural-to-of-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9














It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer























  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    20 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    20 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    20 hours ago















9














It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer























  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    20 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    20 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    20 hours ago













9












9








9







It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer













It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 21 hours ago









Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,658521




1,658521












  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    20 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    20 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    20 hours ago

















  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    20 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    20 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    20 hours ago
















But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

– Kumar sadhu
20 hours ago






But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

– Kumar sadhu
20 hours ago





4




4





@Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

– Chris Melville
20 hours ago





@Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

– Chris Melville
20 hours ago




4




4





@Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

– amI
20 hours ago





@Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

– amI
20 hours ago













3















"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    12 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    11 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    11 hours ago















3















"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    12 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    11 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    11 hours ago













3












3








3








"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 14 hours ago









FSCKurFSCKur

311




311




New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    12 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    11 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    11 hours ago












  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    12 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    11 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    11 hours ago







1




1





+1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

– fred2
12 hours ago





+1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

– fred2
12 hours ago













Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

– amI
11 hours ago





Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

– amI
11 hours ago













An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

– FSCKur
11 hours ago





An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

– FSCKur
11 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200923%2fwhat-is-the-plural-to-of-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп

Герб Смалявічаў Апісанне | Спасылкі | НавігацыяГерб города Смолевичип