Error: “inconsistent hash”. Workers crash and node is unable to connect to othersGeneric baking error on mainRegarding Baker-Node interactionHow do I remove the private mode setting from my node? My node is not connecting to peerError: Tezos_stdlib__Lwt_pipe.Closed for “ideal front node configuration”Node synchronizationRun Alphanet and Mainnet on the same VPSMake compilation errorWhat are the recommended requirements for running a nodeNode stops with 'Cannot open /dev/urandom' errorCannot import secret key ledger
HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive failures
What is the English word for a graduation award?
Generic TVP tradeoffs?
Worshiping one God at a time?
Does the attack bonus from a Masterwork weapon stack with the attack bonus from Masterwork ammunition?
What exactly term 'companion plants' means?
Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?
Writing in a Christian voice
Probably overheated black color SMD pads
How to terminate ping <dest> &
Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps
I seem to dance, I am not a dancer. Who am I?
Suggestions on how to spend Shaabath (constructively) alone
What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?
Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula
Comment Box for Substitution Method of Integrals
How could an airship be repaired midflight?
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
Help prove this basic trig identity please!
Geography in 3D perspective
I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?
Light propagating through a sound wave
If "dar" means "to give", what does "daros" mean?
Turning a hard to access nut?
Error: “inconsistent hash”. Workers crash and node is unable to connect to others
Generic baking error on mainRegarding Baker-Node interactionHow do I remove the private mode setting from my node? My node is not connecting to peerError: Tezos_stdlib__Lwt_pipe.Closed for “ideal front node configuration”Node synchronizationRun Alphanet and Mainnet on the same VPSMake compilation errorWhat are the recommended requirements for running a nodeNode stops with 'Cannot open /dev/urandom' errorCannot import secret key ledger
I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
node tezos-client error
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
add a comment |
I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
node tezos-client error
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
add a comment |
I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
node tezos-client error
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
node tezos-client error
node tezos-client error
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
edited 11 hours ago
MarcB
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
asked 12 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
14719
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:
tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks
Output:
Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Level: 356181
Error:
Inconsistent hash:
local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.
I solved this issue by unmarking the block:
tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Output:
Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.
I still have no idea why this happened.
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
1
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "698"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f800%2ferror-inconsistent-hash-workers-crash-and-node-is-unable-to-connect-to-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:
tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks
Output:
Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Level: 356181
Error:
Inconsistent hash:
local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.
I solved this issue by unmarking the block:
tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Output:
Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.
I still have no idea why this happened.
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
1
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:
tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks
Output:
Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Level: 356181
Error:
Inconsistent hash:
local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.
I solved this issue by unmarking the block:
tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Output:
Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.
I still have no idea why this happened.
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
1
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:
tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks
Output:
Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Level: 356181
Error:
Inconsistent hash:
local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.
I solved this issue by unmarking the block:
tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Output:
Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.
I still have no idea why this happened.
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:
tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks
Output:
Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Level: 356181
Error:
Inconsistent hash:
local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.
I solved this issue by unmarking the block:
tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
Output:
Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.
I still have no idea why this happened.
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
answered 11 hours ago
MarcBMarcB
14719
14719
1
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
1
1
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.
– Ezy♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Tezos Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f800%2ferror-inconsistent-hash-workers-crash-and-node-is-unable-to-connect-to-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
