Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InGravity on supermassive black hole's event horizonAre gravitons bound by the event horizon?Can the event horizon save conservation laws for black holes?Definition of event horizon - Gravity around blackholesCan a rotating black hole have a donut-shaped event horizon?Why won't the following hypothetical scenario succeed in pulling an object free from a black hole's event horizon?Can rotating black hole have toroidal event horizon with penetrating relativistic jet(s)?Is it possible the space-time manifold itself could stop at a black hole's event horizon?Can anything orbit a black hole with dipping under the event horizon?Does light accelerate inside event horizon
Write faster on AT24C32
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
Aging parents with no investments
Is a "Democratic" Feudal System Possible?
What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"
How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Why can Shazam fly?
I see my dog run
Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?
Scaling a graph of a circle and the standard parabola in TikZ
Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?
Identify boardgame from Big movie
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Return to UK after being refused entry years previously
Building a conditional check constraint
Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)
Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InGravity on supermassive black hole's event horizonAre gravitons bound by the event horizon?Can the event horizon save conservation laws for black holes?Definition of event horizon - Gravity around blackholesCan a rotating black hole have a donut-shaped event horizon?Why won't the following hypothetical scenario succeed in pulling an object free from a black hole's event horizon?Can rotating black hole have toroidal event horizon with penetrating relativistic jet(s)?Is it possible the space-time manifold itself could stop at a black hole's event horizon?Can anything orbit a black hole with dipping under the event horizon?Does light accelerate inside event horizon
$begingroup$
After the revelation of the first black hole images, it seems there is a bias towards its south side. Is it because of measuring it from earth or is it something more fundamental in the understanding of the gravitational field?

general-relativity black-holes astronomy event-horizon accretion-disk
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After the revelation of the first black hole images, it seems there is a bias towards its south side. Is it because of measuring it from earth or is it something more fundamental in the understanding of the gravitational field?

general-relativity black-holes astronomy event-horizon accretion-disk
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
Veritasium posted a good description of what all is going on here with a moderately accurate prediction of what this photo would look like before it was published.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After the revelation of the first black hole images, it seems there is a bias towards its south side. Is it because of measuring it from earth or is it something more fundamental in the understanding of the gravitational field?

general-relativity black-holes astronomy event-horizon accretion-disk
$endgroup$
After the revelation of the first black hole images, it seems there is a bias towards its south side. Is it because of measuring it from earth or is it something more fundamental in the understanding of the gravitational field?

general-relativity black-holes astronomy event-horizon accretion-disk
general-relativity black-holes astronomy event-horizon accretion-disk
edited 43 mins ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991240
107k121991240
asked 8 hours ago
0x900x90
1,07341533
1,07341533
10
$begingroup$
Veritasium posted a good description of what all is going on here with a moderately accurate prediction of what this photo would look like before it was published.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
6 hours ago
add a comment |
10
$begingroup$
Veritasium posted a good description of what all is going on here with a moderately accurate prediction of what this photo would look like before it was published.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
6 hours ago
10
10
$begingroup$
Veritasium posted a good description of what all is going on here with a moderately accurate prediction of what this photo would look like before it was published.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Veritasium posted a good description of what all is going on here with a moderately accurate prediction of what this photo would look like before it was published.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
6 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is because of the tilt of the accretion disk with respect of our line of sight. The accretion disk is "in front" of the black hole in the southern part of the image.
You can compare with this image from the 5th paper of the ApJ Letters "First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring", which shows one of the best-fit theoretical simulations alongside the observed image:

There is a number of other effects at play, though. You see only a narrow frequency band, so once the light is shifted by the Doppler effect to a different wavelength in either direction, or when the plasma has the wrong temperature, you stop seeing it in the image. An additional general-relativistic effect is a "space-time push" the rotation of the black hole gives to co-rotating photons, which causes a slight west-east asymmetry in the image as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was going to ask a similiar question, so my (niave and completely amateur) answer is based on the paper recently published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results.

Image from BBC News and EHT Collaboration
The best-known effect is that a black hole, surrounded by an optically thin luminous plasma, should exhibit a "silhouette" or "shadow" morphology: a dim central region delineated by the lensed photon orbit (Falcke et al. 2000). The apparent size of the photon orbit, described not long after Schwarzschild's initial solution was published (Hilbert 1917; von Laue 1921), defines a bright ring or crescent shape that was calculated for arbitrary spin by Bardeen (1973), first imaged through simulations by Luminet 1979, and subsequently studied extensively (Chandrasekhar 1983; Takahashi 2004; Broderick & Loeb 2006). The size and shape of the resulting shadow depends primarily on the mass of the black hole, and only very weakly on its spin and the observing orientation.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason is almost entirely due to Doppler beaming and boosting of radiation arising in matter travelling at relativistic speeds. This in turn is almost entirely controlled by the orientation of the black hole spin. The black hole sweeps up material and magnetic fields almost irrespective of the orientation of any accretion disk.
The pictures below from the fifth event horizon telescope paper makes things clear.

The black arrow indicates the direction of black hole spin. The blue arrow indicates the initial rotation of the accretion flow. The jet of M87 is more or less East-West (projected onto the page), but the right hand side is pointing towards the Earth. It is assumed that the spin vector of the black hole is aligned (or anti-aligned) with this.
The two left hand plots show agreement with the observations. What they have in common is that the black hole spin vector is into the page (anti-aligned with the jet). Gas is forced to rotate in the same way and results in projected relativistic motion towards us south of the black hole and away from us north of the black hole. Doppler boosting and beaming does the rest.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found this animated GIF to explain this really well:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/BlackHole_Lensing.gif
Given this, it looks like it's just relative location of the black hole to the light sources behind/around it.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471753%2fwhy-isnt-the-circumferential-light-around-the-m87-black-holes-event-horizon-sy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is because of the tilt of the accretion disk with respect of our line of sight. The accretion disk is "in front" of the black hole in the southern part of the image.
You can compare with this image from the 5th paper of the ApJ Letters "First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring", which shows one of the best-fit theoretical simulations alongside the observed image:

There is a number of other effects at play, though. You see only a narrow frequency band, so once the light is shifted by the Doppler effect to a different wavelength in either direction, or when the plasma has the wrong temperature, you stop seeing it in the image. An additional general-relativistic effect is a "space-time push" the rotation of the black hole gives to co-rotating photons, which causes a slight west-east asymmetry in the image as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is because of the tilt of the accretion disk with respect of our line of sight. The accretion disk is "in front" of the black hole in the southern part of the image.
You can compare with this image from the 5th paper of the ApJ Letters "First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring", which shows one of the best-fit theoretical simulations alongside the observed image:

There is a number of other effects at play, though. You see only a narrow frequency band, so once the light is shifted by the Doppler effect to a different wavelength in either direction, or when the plasma has the wrong temperature, you stop seeing it in the image. An additional general-relativistic effect is a "space-time push" the rotation of the black hole gives to co-rotating photons, which causes a slight west-east asymmetry in the image as well.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is because of the tilt of the accretion disk with respect of our line of sight. The accretion disk is "in front" of the black hole in the southern part of the image.
You can compare with this image from the 5th paper of the ApJ Letters "First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring", which shows one of the best-fit theoretical simulations alongside the observed image:

There is a number of other effects at play, though. You see only a narrow frequency band, so once the light is shifted by the Doppler effect to a different wavelength in either direction, or when the plasma has the wrong temperature, you stop seeing it in the image. An additional general-relativistic effect is a "space-time push" the rotation of the black hole gives to co-rotating photons, which causes a slight west-east asymmetry in the image as well.
$endgroup$
This is because of the tilt of the accretion disk with respect of our line of sight. The accretion disk is "in front" of the black hole in the southern part of the image.
You can compare with this image from the 5th paper of the ApJ Letters "First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring", which shows one of the best-fit theoretical simulations alongside the observed image:

There is a number of other effects at play, though. You see only a narrow frequency band, so once the light is shifted by the Doppler effect to a different wavelength in either direction, or when the plasma has the wrong temperature, you stop seeing it in the image. An additional general-relativistic effect is a "space-time push" the rotation of the black hole gives to co-rotating photons, which causes a slight west-east asymmetry in the image as well.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
VoidVoid
11k11758
11k11758
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This isn't correct. The asymmetry in the disk you refer to would be in the East-West direction. The emission seen is due to continuum synchrotron radiation so there is little sense in which the radiation moves out of the sensitive frequency range
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was going to ask a similiar question, so my (niave and completely amateur) answer is based on the paper recently published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results.

Image from BBC News and EHT Collaboration
The best-known effect is that a black hole, surrounded by an optically thin luminous plasma, should exhibit a "silhouette" or "shadow" morphology: a dim central region delineated by the lensed photon orbit (Falcke et al. 2000). The apparent size of the photon orbit, described not long after Schwarzschild's initial solution was published (Hilbert 1917; von Laue 1921), defines a bright ring or crescent shape that was calculated for arbitrary spin by Bardeen (1973), first imaged through simulations by Luminet 1979, and subsequently studied extensively (Chandrasekhar 1983; Takahashi 2004; Broderick & Loeb 2006). The size and shape of the resulting shadow depends primarily on the mass of the black hole, and only very weakly on its spin and the observing orientation.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was going to ask a similiar question, so my (niave and completely amateur) answer is based on the paper recently published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results.

Image from BBC News and EHT Collaboration
The best-known effect is that a black hole, surrounded by an optically thin luminous plasma, should exhibit a "silhouette" or "shadow" morphology: a dim central region delineated by the lensed photon orbit (Falcke et al. 2000). The apparent size of the photon orbit, described not long after Schwarzschild's initial solution was published (Hilbert 1917; von Laue 1921), defines a bright ring or crescent shape that was calculated for arbitrary spin by Bardeen (1973), first imaged through simulations by Luminet 1979, and subsequently studied extensively (Chandrasekhar 1983; Takahashi 2004; Broderick & Loeb 2006). The size and shape of the resulting shadow depends primarily on the mass of the black hole, and only very weakly on its spin and the observing orientation.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was going to ask a similiar question, so my (niave and completely amateur) answer is based on the paper recently published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results.

Image from BBC News and EHT Collaboration
The best-known effect is that a black hole, surrounded by an optically thin luminous plasma, should exhibit a "silhouette" or "shadow" morphology: a dim central region delineated by the lensed photon orbit (Falcke et al. 2000). The apparent size of the photon orbit, described not long after Schwarzschild's initial solution was published (Hilbert 1917; von Laue 1921), defines a bright ring or crescent shape that was calculated for arbitrary spin by Bardeen (1973), first imaged through simulations by Luminet 1979, and subsequently studied extensively (Chandrasekhar 1983; Takahashi 2004; Broderick & Loeb 2006). The size and shape of the resulting shadow depends primarily on the mass of the black hole, and only very weakly on its spin and the observing orientation.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I was going to ask a similiar question, so my (niave and completely amateur) answer is based on the paper recently published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results.

Image from BBC News and EHT Collaboration
The best-known effect is that a black hole, surrounded by an optically thin luminous plasma, should exhibit a "silhouette" or "shadow" morphology: a dim central region delineated by the lensed photon orbit (Falcke et al. 2000). The apparent size of the photon orbit, described not long after Schwarzschild's initial solution was published (Hilbert 1917; von Laue 1921), defines a bright ring or crescent shape that was calculated for arbitrary spin by Bardeen (1973), first imaged through simulations by Luminet 1979, and subsequently studied extensively (Chandrasekhar 1983; Takahashi 2004; Broderick & Loeb 2006). The size and shape of the resulting shadow depends primarily on the mass of the black hole, and only very weakly on its spin and the observing orientation.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 8 hours ago
StudyStudyStudyStudy
1397
1397
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
StudyStudy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am afraid your answer did not explain its answer to me :) but this YouTube video explains it in a way I can grasp. youtube.com/watch?v=zUyH3XhpLTo
$endgroup$
– Douglas Held
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DouglasHeld What amazes me is the details that the observers expected to see, that is, the level of prediction involved. But poor old John Mitchell en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michell hardly gets a mention in the mainstream media.
$endgroup$
– StudyStudy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't address the reason for the asymmetry in the ring at all
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason is almost entirely due to Doppler beaming and boosting of radiation arising in matter travelling at relativistic speeds. This in turn is almost entirely controlled by the orientation of the black hole spin. The black hole sweeps up material and magnetic fields almost irrespective of the orientation of any accretion disk.
The pictures below from the fifth event horizon telescope paper makes things clear.

The black arrow indicates the direction of black hole spin. The blue arrow indicates the initial rotation of the accretion flow. The jet of M87 is more or less East-West (projected onto the page), but the right hand side is pointing towards the Earth. It is assumed that the spin vector of the black hole is aligned (or anti-aligned) with this.
The two left hand plots show agreement with the observations. What they have in common is that the black hole spin vector is into the page (anti-aligned with the jet). Gas is forced to rotate in the same way and results in projected relativistic motion towards us south of the black hole and away from us north of the black hole. Doppler boosting and beaming does the rest.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason is almost entirely due to Doppler beaming and boosting of radiation arising in matter travelling at relativistic speeds. This in turn is almost entirely controlled by the orientation of the black hole spin. The black hole sweeps up material and magnetic fields almost irrespective of the orientation of any accretion disk.
The pictures below from the fifth event horizon telescope paper makes things clear.

The black arrow indicates the direction of black hole spin. The blue arrow indicates the initial rotation of the accretion flow. The jet of M87 is more or less East-West (projected onto the page), but the right hand side is pointing towards the Earth. It is assumed that the spin vector of the black hole is aligned (or anti-aligned) with this.
The two left hand plots show agreement with the observations. What they have in common is that the black hole spin vector is into the page (anti-aligned with the jet). Gas is forced to rotate in the same way and results in projected relativistic motion towards us south of the black hole and away from us north of the black hole. Doppler boosting and beaming does the rest.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reason is almost entirely due to Doppler beaming and boosting of radiation arising in matter travelling at relativistic speeds. This in turn is almost entirely controlled by the orientation of the black hole spin. The black hole sweeps up material and magnetic fields almost irrespective of the orientation of any accretion disk.
The pictures below from the fifth event horizon telescope paper makes things clear.

The black arrow indicates the direction of black hole spin. The blue arrow indicates the initial rotation of the accretion flow. The jet of M87 is more or less East-West (projected onto the page), but the right hand side is pointing towards the Earth. It is assumed that the spin vector of the black hole is aligned (or anti-aligned) with this.
The two left hand plots show agreement with the observations. What they have in common is that the black hole spin vector is into the page (anti-aligned with the jet). Gas is forced to rotate in the same way and results in projected relativistic motion towards us south of the black hole and away from us north of the black hole. Doppler boosting and beaming does the rest.
$endgroup$
The reason is almost entirely due to Doppler beaming and boosting of radiation arising in matter travelling at relativistic speeds. This in turn is almost entirely controlled by the orientation of the black hole spin. The black hole sweeps up material and magnetic fields almost irrespective of the orientation of any accretion disk.
The pictures below from the fifth event horizon telescope paper makes things clear.

The black arrow indicates the direction of black hole spin. The blue arrow indicates the initial rotation of the accretion flow. The jet of M87 is more or less East-West (projected onto the page), but the right hand side is pointing towards the Earth. It is assumed that the spin vector of the black hole is aligned (or anti-aligned) with this.
The two left hand plots show agreement with the observations. What they have in common is that the black hole spin vector is into the page (anti-aligned with the jet). Gas is forced to rotate in the same way and results in projected relativistic motion towards us south of the black hole and away from us north of the black hole. Doppler boosting and beaming does the rest.
answered 1 hour ago
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
70.7k7144245
70.7k7144245
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found this animated GIF to explain this really well:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/BlackHole_Lensing.gif
Given this, it looks like it's just relative location of the black hole to the light sources behind/around it.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found this animated GIF to explain this really well:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/BlackHole_Lensing.gif
Given this, it looks like it's just relative location of the black hole to the light sources behind/around it.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found this animated GIF to explain this really well:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/BlackHole_Lensing.gif
Given this, it looks like it's just relative location of the black hole to the light sources behind/around it.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I found this animated GIF to explain this really well:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/BlackHole_Lensing.gif
Given this, it looks like it's just relative location of the black hole to the light sources behind/around it.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 hours ago
zxbEPREFzxbEPREF
109
109
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
zxbEPREF is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Like Doppler effect?
$endgroup$
– 0x90
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
No - not like doppler effect.
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
18 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471753%2fwhy-isnt-the-circumferential-light-around-the-m87-black-holes-event-horizon-sy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
10
$begingroup$
Veritasium posted a good description of what all is going on here with a moderately accurate prediction of what this photo would look like before it was published.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
6 hours ago