How to type this arrow in math mode? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageHow do I write above a left-right arrow?How to draw an arrow with a different head?how to draw a vertical arrow with text over it?Arrow in text modeMath mode - bidirectional mapArrow through text in Math modestealth hook arrow in inline math?How to invert the direction of an arrow?Longer arrow over text in math modeArrow between lines in the align environment
Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?
Identify boardgame from Big movie
Why can Shazam fly?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?
How to type this arrow in math mode?
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
Multiply Two Integer Polynomials
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
One word riddle: Vowel in the middle
Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?
Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?
What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?
Origin of "cooter" meaning "vagina"
Lightning Grid - Columns and Rows?
Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)
Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)
Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Where to refill my bottle in India?
How to type this arrow in math mode?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageHow do I write above a left-right arrow?How to draw an arrow with a different head?how to draw a vertical arrow with text over it?Arrow in text modeMath mode - bidirectional mapArrow through text in Math modestealth hook arrow in inline math?How to invert the direction of an arrow?Longer arrow over text in math modeArrow between lines in the align environment
I need an arrow like the following:
I tried
newcommandwedgearrowmathrel/joinrelssearrow %stmaryrd
but it doesn't work well.
math-mode arrows
New contributor
add a comment |
I need an arrow like the following:
I tried
newcommandwedgearrowmathrel/joinrelssearrow %stmaryrd
but it doesn't work well.
math-mode arrows
New contributor
add a comment |
I need an arrow like the following:
I tried
newcommandwedgearrowmathrel/joinrelssearrow %stmaryrd
but it doesn't work well.
math-mode arrows
New contributor
I need an arrow like the following:
I tried
newcommandwedgearrowmathrel/joinrelssearrow %stmaryrd
but it doesn't work well.
math-mode arrows
math-mode arrows
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
Eclipse SunEclipse Sun
1213
1213
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Similar to Ahrtaler's answer, the difference being that it also cooperates with subscripts and becomes bold if one is in bold mode. I recommend this thread for further reading.
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandcheckbold[1]% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
edef@tempamath@versionedef@tempbbold%
ifx@tempa@tempb%
def#11%
else
def#10%
fi
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrowcheckboldtmp%
ensuremathmathrel%
mathchoice%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.075ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.45em) -- ++(-60:0.45em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.06ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.35em) -- ++ (-60:0.35em);
begindocument
$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
boldmath$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
unboldmath
enddocument
EDITs:
- added
mathrel
at Eclipse Sun's suggestion. - Made the macro detect the font weight, too, so the arrow goes bold in
boldmath
orboldsymbol
, just like the standard arrows.
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something likemathrel
so that the spacing looks better?
– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
add a comment |
I think you could do something like that:
documentclassscrartcl
usepackagetikz
newlengthtextsize
makeatletter
setlengthtextsizef@size pt
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrow%
resizebox ! textsize
begintikzpicture
draw[->, line width = 2pt] (0,0) -- (.5,1) -- (1,0);
endtikzpicture
begindocument
Hi this wedgearrow is a wedgearrow
enddocument
add a comment |
No tikz
...works across math styles.
documentclassarticle
usepackagescalerel,stmaryrd
newsaveboxwedgearrowbaseline
saveboxwedgearrowbaseline$scalerel%
ooalignkern.05pt/cr/mkern-8.5mussearrow$
newcommandwedgearrowmathrelscalerel*%
useboxwedgearrowbaselineX %stmaryrd
begindocument
$Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptscriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
enddocument
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Eclipse Sun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484215%2fhow-to-type-this-arrow-in-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Similar to Ahrtaler's answer, the difference being that it also cooperates with subscripts and becomes bold if one is in bold mode. I recommend this thread for further reading.
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandcheckbold[1]% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
edef@tempamath@versionedef@tempbbold%
ifx@tempa@tempb%
def#11%
else
def#10%
fi
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrowcheckboldtmp%
ensuremathmathrel%
mathchoice%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.075ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.45em) -- ++(-60:0.45em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.06ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.35em) -- ++ (-60:0.35em);
begindocument
$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
boldmath$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
unboldmath
enddocument
EDITs:
- added
mathrel
at Eclipse Sun's suggestion. - Made the macro detect the font weight, too, so the arrow goes bold in
boldmath
orboldsymbol
, just like the standard arrows.
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something likemathrel
so that the spacing looks better?
– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
add a comment |
Similar to Ahrtaler's answer, the difference being that it also cooperates with subscripts and becomes bold if one is in bold mode. I recommend this thread for further reading.
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandcheckbold[1]% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
edef@tempamath@versionedef@tempbbold%
ifx@tempa@tempb%
def#11%
else
def#10%
fi
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrowcheckboldtmp%
ensuremathmathrel%
mathchoice%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.075ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.45em) -- ++(-60:0.45em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.06ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.35em) -- ++ (-60:0.35em);
begindocument
$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
boldmath$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
unboldmath
enddocument
EDITs:
- added
mathrel
at Eclipse Sun's suggestion. - Made the macro detect the font weight, too, so the arrow goes bold in
boldmath
orboldsymbol
, just like the standard arrows.
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something likemathrel
so that the spacing looks better?
– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
add a comment |
Similar to Ahrtaler's answer, the difference being that it also cooperates with subscripts and becomes bold if one is in bold mode. I recommend this thread for further reading.
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandcheckbold[1]% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
edef@tempamath@versionedef@tempbbold%
ifx@tempa@tempb%
def#11%
else
def#10%
fi
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrowcheckboldtmp%
ensuremathmathrel%
mathchoice%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.075ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.45em) -- ++(-60:0.45em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.06ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.35em) -- ++ (-60:0.35em);
begindocument
$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
boldmath$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
unboldmath
enddocument
EDITs:
- added
mathrel
at Eclipse Sun's suggestion. - Made the macro detect the font weight, too, so the arrow goes bold in
boldmath
orboldsymbol
, just like the standard arrows.
Similar to Ahrtaler's answer, the difference being that it also cooperates with subscripts and becomes bold if one is in bold mode. I recommend this thread for further reading.
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandcheckbold[1]% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
edef@tempamath@versionedef@tempbbold%
ifx@tempa@tempb%
def#11%
else
def#10%
fi
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrowcheckboldtmp%
ensuremathmathrel%
mathchoice%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.1ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.6em) -- ++ (-60:0.6em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.075ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.45em) -- ++(-60:0.45em);
%
tikz[baseline=-0.06ex]draw[line width=(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em,->](0,0) -- (60:0.35em) -- ++ (-60:0.35em);
begindocument
$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
boldmath$Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$ Large $Awedgearrow B_Cwedgearrow D$
unboldmath
enddocument
EDITs:
- added
mathrel
at Eclipse Sun's suggestion. - Made the macro detect the font weight, too, so the arrow goes bold in
boldmath
orboldsymbol
, just like the standard arrows.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 4 hours ago
marmotmarmot
117k5150282
117k5150282
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something likemathrel
so that the spacing looks better?
– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
add a comment |
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something likemathrel
so that the spacing looks better?
– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
looks a bit smarter than mine. But it is harder to understand.
– Ahrtaler
4 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something like
mathrel
so that the spacing looks better?– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
Thanks! Should we use something like
mathrel
so that the spacing looks better?– Eclipse Sun
3 hours ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Yes, that's a great suggestion!
– marmot
1 hour ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
@EclipseSun Now it also sees the font weight, Of course, you can change the appearance (angles, baseline, line width etc.) at will without the need to learn many commands, and the line joins and so on are automatically appealing. Loading TikZ *only for that might be a bit much, but if you are considering inventing more symbols that might be a good choice.
– marmot
56 mins ago
add a comment |
I think you could do something like that:
documentclassscrartcl
usepackagetikz
newlengthtextsize
makeatletter
setlengthtextsizef@size pt
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrow%
resizebox ! textsize
begintikzpicture
draw[->, line width = 2pt] (0,0) -- (.5,1) -- (1,0);
endtikzpicture
begindocument
Hi this wedgearrow is a wedgearrow
enddocument
add a comment |
I think you could do something like that:
documentclassscrartcl
usepackagetikz
newlengthtextsize
makeatletter
setlengthtextsizef@size pt
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrow%
resizebox ! textsize
begintikzpicture
draw[->, line width = 2pt] (0,0) -- (.5,1) -- (1,0);
endtikzpicture
begindocument
Hi this wedgearrow is a wedgearrow
enddocument
add a comment |
I think you could do something like that:
documentclassscrartcl
usepackagetikz
newlengthtextsize
makeatletter
setlengthtextsizef@size pt
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrow%
resizebox ! textsize
begintikzpicture
draw[->, line width = 2pt] (0,0) -- (.5,1) -- (1,0);
endtikzpicture
begindocument
Hi this wedgearrow is a wedgearrow
enddocument
I think you could do something like that:
documentclassscrartcl
usepackagetikz
newlengthtextsize
makeatletter
setlengthtextsizef@size pt
makeatother
newcommandwedgearrow%
resizebox ! textsize
begintikzpicture
draw[->, line width = 2pt] (0,0) -- (.5,1) -- (1,0);
endtikzpicture
begindocument
Hi this wedgearrow is a wedgearrow
enddocument
answered 4 hours ago
AhrtalerAhrtaler
1396
1396
add a comment |
add a comment |
No tikz
...works across math styles.
documentclassarticle
usepackagescalerel,stmaryrd
newsaveboxwedgearrowbaseline
saveboxwedgearrowbaseline$scalerel%
ooalignkern.05pt/cr/mkern-8.5mussearrow$
newcommandwedgearrowmathrelscalerel*%
useboxwedgearrowbaselineX %stmaryrd
begindocument
$Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptscriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
enddocument
add a comment |
No tikz
...works across math styles.
documentclassarticle
usepackagescalerel,stmaryrd
newsaveboxwedgearrowbaseline
saveboxwedgearrowbaseline$scalerel%
ooalignkern.05pt/cr/mkern-8.5mussearrow$
newcommandwedgearrowmathrelscalerel*%
useboxwedgearrowbaselineX %stmaryrd
begindocument
$Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptscriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
enddocument
add a comment |
No tikz
...works across math styles.
documentclassarticle
usepackagescalerel,stmaryrd
newsaveboxwedgearrowbaseline
saveboxwedgearrowbaseline$scalerel%
ooalignkern.05pt/cr/mkern-8.5mussearrow$
newcommandwedgearrowmathrelscalerel*%
useboxwedgearrowbaselineX %stmaryrd
begindocument
$Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptscriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
enddocument
No tikz
...works across math styles.
documentclassarticle
usepackagescalerel,stmaryrd
newsaveboxwedgearrowbaseline
saveboxwedgearrowbaseline$scalerel%
ooalignkern.05pt/cr/mkern-8.5mussearrow$
newcommandwedgearrowmathrelscalerel*%
useboxwedgearrowbaselineX %stmaryrd
begindocument
$Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
$scriptscriptstyle Kwedgearrow L$
enddocument
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
161k9205416
161k9205416
add a comment |
add a comment |
Eclipse Sun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Eclipse Sun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Eclipse Sun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Eclipse Sun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484215%2fhow-to-type-this-arrow-in-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown