Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Functional Knapsack Problem in PythonSorting movie search results by similaritySorting a list and another list inside each itemGeneric natural merge sort a linked-list in CIce Cream ParlorFlight combinations between two citiesCompute the minimum distance between two points in a 2-D planeConvert a JS DataTable to an array of objectsSorting a 2-dimensional array with counting sortRemove nth node from last position in linked list

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

What's the point in a preamp?

My body leaves; my core can stay

What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?

Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?

How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

US Healthcare consultation for visitors

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Are there continuous functions who are the same in an interval but differ in at least one other point?

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)

How to determine omitted units in a publication

Match Roman Numerals

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?

Python - Fishing Simulator

Simulating Exploding Dice

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive



Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Functional Knapsack Problem in PythonSorting movie search results by similaritySorting a list and another list inside each itemGeneric natural merge sort a linked-list in CIce Cream ParlorFlight combinations between two citiesCompute the minimum distance between two points in a 2-D planeConvert a JS DataTable to an array of objectsSorting a 2-dimensional array with counting sortRemove nth node from last position in linked list



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I have this sample data:



let trips = [

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,
];


and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:



let trips = [

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,
];


My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!



function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 
let sortedArray = [];

let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);

for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



return sortedArray;


sortByLinked(trips)









share|improve this question











$endgroup$



migrated from stackoverflow.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

















  • $begingroup$
    is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
    $endgroup$
    – karthick
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is from unique for all elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Taplar
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Taplar yes from is unique
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    3 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


I have this sample data:



let trips = [

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,
];


and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:



let trips = [

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,
];


My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!



function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 
let sortedArray = [];

let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);

for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



return sortedArray;


sortByLinked(trips)









share|improve this question











$endgroup$



migrated from stackoverflow.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

















  • $begingroup$
    is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
    $endgroup$
    – karthick
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is from unique for all elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Taplar
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Taplar yes from is unique
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    3 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have this sample data:



let trips = [

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,
];


and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:



let trips = [

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,
];


My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!



function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 
let sortedArray = [];

let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);

for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



return sortedArray;


sortByLinked(trips)









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have this sample data:



let trips = [

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,
];


and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:



let trips = [

from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
,

from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
,

from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
,
];


My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!



function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 
let sortedArray = [];

let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);

for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++)
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from)
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);



return sortedArray;


sortByLinked(trips)






javascript algorithm sorting graph






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









200_success

131k17157422




131k17157422










asked 5 hours ago









Shivam BhallaShivam Bhalla

1875




1875




migrated from stackoverflow.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.









migrated from stackoverflow.com 5 hours ago


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.













  • $begingroup$
    is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
    $endgroup$
    – karthick
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is from unique for all elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Taplar
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Taplar yes from is unique
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
    $endgroup$
    – karthick
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is from unique for all elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Taplar
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Taplar yes from is unique
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Bhalla
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Is from unique for all elements?
$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Is from unique for all elements?
$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map() or Array.filter().



Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.






function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2)
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;


// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));









share|improve this answer










New contributor




matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
    $endgroup$
    – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
    5 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

Code style



  • Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg const sortedArray = [];


  • Don't include the type in the name, Eg const sortedArray = []; can be Eg const sorted = [];



  • The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that "JFK" is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin. function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) { which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass the from parameter.



    However in this example best to leave the default as undefined if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.



  • The name sort is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).


  • You have declared i two times. As a var you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in the for loop.


  • Rather than use Array.filter you can use Array.find. It will find the first instance.


  • Using for...of rather than for(;;) reduces the code complexity.


  • No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the break token to stop a loop early


  • Put a space between if and (


  • Don't forget to add the ; where appropriate. It is missing from the call sortByLinked(trips)


  • You call the origin origin and from this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items use from then that would be the better name for the second input argument.


Using the above points to modify your code we get



function tripFrom(trips, from) 
const sorted = [];
const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
sorted.push(first);

for (const trip of trips)
if (first.to === trip.from)
sorted.push(trip);
break;


for (const trip of trips)
if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from)
sorted.push(trips);
break;


return sorted;


sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");


This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.



Improving the function.



It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.



To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips and what to do when we encounter any problems.



  1. That the array trips contains objects that each have the property from and to that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so.

  2. That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.

  3. That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching trip.to can not be found. The returned array can be 0 to trips.length in size.

  4. Locations are case sensitive.

  5. If there is more than one matching trip.from it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)

Example



function tripFrom(trips, from) 
const result = [];
while (result.length < trips.length)
const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
if (!trip) break
from = trip.to;
result.push(trip);

return result;

tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.



function tripFrom(trips, from) 
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length)
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

return res;

tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res to the trips array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ... operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res) thus pushing all the items to the array.



function tripFrom(trips, from) 
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length)
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

trips.length = 0;
trips.push(...res);
return trips;

tripFrom(trips, "JFK");





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.



    And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map first, so that you can access a trip by its from property in constant time:






    function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
    const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
    const result = [];
    for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
    result.push(trip);
    map.delete(origin);

    return result;


    const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
    const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
    console.log(sorted);








    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "196"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217351%2fsort-list-of-array-linked-objects-by-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map() or Array.filter().



      Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.






      function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

      // this will be useful
      function swap(array, index1, index2)
      let temp = array[index1];
      array[index1] = array[index2];
      array[index2] = temp;


      // find first one
      let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

      // put him in the front of the list
      swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

      // sort it in place
      for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
      swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));









      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
        $endgroup$
        – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
        5 hours ago
















      4












      $begingroup$

      Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map() or Array.filter().



      Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.






      function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

      // this will be useful
      function swap(array, index1, index2)
      let temp = array[index1];
      array[index1] = array[index2];
      array[index2] = temp;


      // find first one
      let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

      // put him in the front of the list
      swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

      // sort it in place
      for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
      swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));









      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
        $endgroup$
        – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
        5 hours ago














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map() or Array.filter().



      Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.






      function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

      // this will be useful
      function swap(array, index1, index2)
      let temp = array[index1];
      array[index1] = array[index2];
      array[index2] = temp;


      // find first one
      let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

      // put him in the front of the list
      swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

      // sort it in place
      for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
      swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));









      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$



      Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map() or Array.filter().



      Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.






      function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

      // this will be useful
      function swap(array, index1, index2)
      let temp = array[index1];
      array[index1] = array[index2];
      array[index2] = temp;


      // find first one
      let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

      // put him in the front of the list
      swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

      // sort it in place
      for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
      swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));









      function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

      // this will be useful
      function swap(array, index1, index2)
      let temp = array[index1];
      array[index1] = array[index2];
      array[index2] = temp;


      // find first one
      let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

      // put him in the front of the list
      swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

      // sort it in place
      for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
      swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));






      function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') 

      // this will be useful
      function swap(array, index1, index2)
      let temp = array[index1];
      array[index1] = array[index2];
      array[index2] = temp;


      // find first one
      let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];

      // put him in the front of the list
      swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);

      // sort it in place
      for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++)
      swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 5 hours ago









      Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

      10.3k62168




      10.3k62168






      New contributor




      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 5 hours ago









      matthewlam.jsmatthewlam.js

      411




      411




      New contributor




      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      matthewlam.js is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      • $begingroup$
        Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
        $endgroup$
        – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
        5 hours ago

















      • $begingroup$
        Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
        $endgroup$
        – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
        5 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
      $endgroup$
      – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
      5 hours ago





      $begingroup$
      Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
      $endgroup$
      – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
      5 hours ago














      2












      $begingroup$

      Code style



      • Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg const sortedArray = [];


      • Don't include the type in the name, Eg const sortedArray = []; can be Eg const sorted = [];



      • The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that "JFK" is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin. function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) { which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass the from parameter.



        However in this example best to leave the default as undefined if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.



      • The name sort is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).


      • You have declared i two times. As a var you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in the for loop.


      • Rather than use Array.filter you can use Array.find. It will find the first instance.


      • Using for...of rather than for(;;) reduces the code complexity.


      • No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the break token to stop a loop early


      • Put a space between if and (


      • Don't forget to add the ; where appropriate. It is missing from the call sortByLinked(trips)


      • You call the origin origin and from this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items use from then that would be the better name for the second input argument.


      Using the above points to modify your code we get



      function tripFrom(trips, from) 
      const sorted = [];
      const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
      sorted.push(first);

      for (const trip of trips)
      if (first.to === trip.from)
      sorted.push(trip);
      break;


      for (const trip of trips)
      if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from)
      sorted.push(trips);
      break;


      return sorted;


      sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");


      This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.



      Improving the function.



      It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.



      To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips and what to do when we encounter any problems.



      1. That the array trips contains objects that each have the property from and to that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so.

      2. That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.

      3. That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching trip.to can not be found. The returned array can be 0 to trips.length in size.

      4. Locations are case sensitive.

      5. If there is more than one matching trip.from it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)

      Example



      function tripFrom(trips, from) 
      const result = [];
      while (result.length < trips.length)
      const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
      if (!trip) break
      from = trip.to;
      result.push(trip);

      return result;

      tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


      Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.



      function tripFrom(trips, from) 
      const res = [];
      while (res.length < trips.length)
      from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

      return res;

      tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


      It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res to the trips array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ... operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res) thus pushing all the items to the array.



      function tripFrom(trips, from) 
      const res = [];
      while (res.length < trips.length)
      from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

      trips.length = 0;
      trips.push(...res);
      return trips;

      tripFrom(trips, "JFK");





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        Code style



        • Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg const sortedArray = [];


        • Don't include the type in the name, Eg const sortedArray = []; can be Eg const sorted = [];



        • The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that "JFK" is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin. function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) { which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass the from parameter.



          However in this example best to leave the default as undefined if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.



        • The name sort is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).


        • You have declared i two times. As a var you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in the for loop.


        • Rather than use Array.filter you can use Array.find. It will find the first instance.


        • Using for...of rather than for(;;) reduces the code complexity.


        • No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the break token to stop a loop early


        • Put a space between if and (


        • Don't forget to add the ; where appropriate. It is missing from the call sortByLinked(trips)


        • You call the origin origin and from this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items use from then that would be the better name for the second input argument.


        Using the above points to modify your code we get



        function tripFrom(trips, from) 
        const sorted = [];
        const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
        sorted.push(first);

        for (const trip of trips)
        if (first.to === trip.from)
        sorted.push(trip);
        break;


        for (const trip of trips)
        if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from)
        sorted.push(trips);
        break;


        return sorted;


        sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");


        This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.



        Improving the function.



        It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.



        To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips and what to do when we encounter any problems.



        1. That the array trips contains objects that each have the property from and to that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so.

        2. That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.

        3. That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching trip.to can not be found. The returned array can be 0 to trips.length in size.

        4. Locations are case sensitive.

        5. If there is more than one matching trip.from it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)

        Example



        function tripFrom(trips, from) 
        const result = [];
        while (result.length < trips.length)
        const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
        if (!trip) break
        from = trip.to;
        result.push(trip);

        return result;

        tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


        Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.



        function tripFrom(trips, from) 
        const res = [];
        while (res.length < trips.length)
        from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

        return res;

        tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


        It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res to the trips array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ... operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res) thus pushing all the items to the array.



        function tripFrom(trips, from) 
        const res = [];
        while (res.length < trips.length)
        from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

        trips.length = 0;
        trips.push(...res);
        return trips;

        tripFrom(trips, "JFK");





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Code style



          • Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg const sortedArray = [];


          • Don't include the type in the name, Eg const sortedArray = []; can be Eg const sorted = [];



          • The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that "JFK" is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin. function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) { which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass the from parameter.



            However in this example best to leave the default as undefined if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.



          • The name sort is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).


          • You have declared i two times. As a var you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in the for loop.


          • Rather than use Array.filter you can use Array.find. It will find the first instance.


          • Using for...of rather than for(;;) reduces the code complexity.


          • No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the break token to stop a loop early


          • Put a space between if and (


          • Don't forget to add the ; where appropriate. It is missing from the call sortByLinked(trips)


          • You call the origin origin and from this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items use from then that would be the better name for the second input argument.


          Using the above points to modify your code we get



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const sorted = [];
          const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
          sorted.push(first);

          for (const trip of trips)
          if (first.to === trip.from)
          sorted.push(trip);
          break;


          for (const trip of trips)
          if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from)
          sorted.push(trips);
          break;


          return sorted;


          sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");


          This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.



          Improving the function.



          It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.



          To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips and what to do when we encounter any problems.



          1. That the array trips contains objects that each have the property from and to that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so.

          2. That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.

          3. That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching trip.to can not be found. The returned array can be 0 to trips.length in size.

          4. Locations are case sensitive.

          5. If there is more than one matching trip.from it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)

          Example



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const result = [];
          while (result.length < trips.length)
          const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
          if (!trip) break
          from = trip.to;
          result.push(trip);

          return result;

          tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


          Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const res = [];
          while (res.length < trips.length)
          from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

          return res;

          tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


          It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res to the trips array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ... operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res) thus pushing all the items to the array.



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const res = [];
          while (res.length < trips.length)
          from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

          trips.length = 0;
          trips.push(...res);
          return trips;

          tripFrom(trips, "JFK");





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Code style



          • Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg const sortedArray = [];


          • Don't include the type in the name, Eg const sortedArray = []; can be Eg const sorted = [];



          • The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that "JFK" is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin. function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) { which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass the from parameter.



            However in this example best to leave the default as undefined if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.



          • The name sort is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).


          • You have declared i two times. As a var you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in the for loop.


          • Rather than use Array.filter you can use Array.find. It will find the first instance.


          • Using for...of rather than for(;;) reduces the code complexity.


          • No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the break token to stop a loop early


          • Put a space between if and (


          • Don't forget to add the ; where appropriate. It is missing from the call sortByLinked(trips)


          • You call the origin origin and from this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items use from then that would be the better name for the second input argument.


          Using the above points to modify your code we get



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const sorted = [];
          const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
          sorted.push(first);

          for (const trip of trips)
          if (first.to === trip.from)
          sorted.push(trip);
          break;


          for (const trip of trips)
          if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from)
          sorted.push(trips);
          break;


          return sorted;


          sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");


          This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.



          Improving the function.



          It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.



          To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips and what to do when we encounter any problems.



          1. That the array trips contains objects that each have the property from and to that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so.

          2. That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.

          3. That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching trip.to can not be found. The returned array can be 0 to trips.length in size.

          4. Locations are case sensitive.

          5. If there is more than one matching trip.from it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)

          Example



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const result = [];
          while (result.length < trips.length)
          const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
          if (!trip) break
          from = trip.to;
          result.push(trip);

          return result;

          tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


          Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const res = [];
          while (res.length < trips.length)
          from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

          return res;

          tripFrom(trips, "JFK");


          It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res to the trips array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ... operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res) thus pushing all the items to the array.



          function tripFrom(trips, from) 
          const res = [];
          while (res.length < trips.length)
          from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;

          trips.length = 0;
          trips.push(...res);
          return trips;

          tripFrom(trips, "JFK");






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Blindman67Blindman67

          9,3901622




          9,3901622





















              1












              $begingroup$

              It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.



              And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map first, so that you can access a trip by its from property in constant time:






              function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
              const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
              const result = [];
              for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
              result.push(trip);
              map.delete(origin);

              return result;


              const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
              const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
              console.log(sorted);








              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.



                And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map first, so that you can access a trip by its from property in constant time:






                function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
                const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
                const result = [];
                for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
                result.push(trip);
                map.delete(origin);

                return result;


                const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
                const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
                console.log(sorted);








                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.



                  And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map first, so that you can access a trip by its from property in constant time:






                  function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
                  const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
                  const result = [];
                  for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
                  result.push(trip);
                  map.delete(origin);

                  return result;


                  const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
                  const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
                  console.log(sorted);








                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.



                  And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map first, so that you can access a trip by its from property in constant time:






                  function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
                  const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
                  const result = [];
                  for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
                  result.push(trip);
                  map.delete(origin);

                  return result;


                  const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
                  const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
                  console.log(sorted);








                  function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
                  const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
                  const result = [];
                  for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
                  result.push(trip);
                  map.delete(origin);

                  return result;


                  const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
                  const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
                  console.log(sorted);





                  function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") 
                  const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
                  const result = [];
                  for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to)
                  result.push(trip);
                  map.delete(origin);

                  return result;


                  const trips = [from: "DEN",to: "JFK",from: "SEA",to: "DEN",from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'];
                  const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
                  console.log(sorted);






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 5 hours ago









                  trincottrincot

                  44737




                  44737



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217351%2fsort-list-of-array-linked-objects-by-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

                      Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп

                      ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result