Equivalence principle before EinsteinHow exactly was the principle of conservation of energy discovered?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Is a tag line useful on a cover?

How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?

Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Test if tikzmark exists on same page

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Is this a crack on the carbon frame?

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

To string or not to string

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?



Equivalence principle before Einstein


How exactly was the principle of conservation of energy discovered?













4












$begingroup$


In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from physics.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    7 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from physics.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    7 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.







untagged






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 7 hours ago









MaximMaxim

1213




1213




migrated from physics.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.









migrated from physics.stackexchange.com 2 hours ago


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    7 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    7 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago







4




4




$begingroup$
Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
$endgroup$
– hyportnex
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
$endgroup$
– hyportnex
7 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
"And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
"And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "587"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhsm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8460%2fequivalence-principle-before-einstein%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



    Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



    Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



    Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      8












      $begingroup$

      There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



      Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



      Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



      Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        8












        8








        8





        $begingroup$

        There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



        Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



        Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



        Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



        Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



        Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



        Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        Ben CrowellBen Crowell

        1,681824




        1,681824



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to History of Science and Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhsm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8460%2fequivalence-principle-before-einstein%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

            ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

            Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery