Can the Meissner effect explain very large floating structures?Is it possible to use a planet's magnetic field for transportation?Floating cities with a new superconductor v2What natural or artificial geographical structures that could allow a large-scale true “water going down the drain” whirlpool?Dumbbell planet - how would humans cross the bridge?Creating a stable split earthStable orbit around a magnetarHow plausible is a volcanic planet with a hundreds of miles tall atmosphere, flying mountains and radio interference?Can this unique planet be colonized?How can I scientifically explain the afterlifeHow would a very large, sentient spider communicate?Creating flying citiesCould black hole civilizations even exist?
Expand and Contract
What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?
What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"
Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?
Is this a hacking script in function.php?
I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man
Valid term from quadratic sequence?
Apex Framework / library for consuming REST services
Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?
Unlock My Phone! February 2018
How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?
Alternative to sending password over mail?
Detention in 1997
iPad being using in wall mount battery swollen
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
How to show a landlord what we have in savings?
CAST throwing error when run in stored procedure but not when run as raw query
What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?
ssTTsSTtRrriinInnnnNNNIiinngg
Probability that a draw from a normal distribution is some number greater than another draw from the same distribution
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?
Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?
Do scales need to be in alphabetical order?
Can the Meissner effect explain very large floating structures?
Is it possible to use a planet's magnetic field for transportation?Floating cities with a new superconductor v2What natural or artificial geographical structures that could allow a large-scale true “water going down the drain” whirlpool?Dumbbell planet - how would humans cross the bridge?Creating a stable split earthStable orbit around a magnetarHow plausible is a volcanic planet with a hundreds of miles tall atmosphere, flying mountains and radio interference?Can this unique planet be colonized?How can I scientifically explain the afterlifeHow would a very large, sentient spider communicate?Creating flying citiesCould black hole civilizations even exist?
$begingroup$
James Cameron's Avatar featured floating mountains which stayed aloft due to the Meissner effect; they contained large quantities of the room-temperature superconductor unobtainium, which, due to their strong electromagnetic fields, were suspended above the ground.
Would this really work though? I've seen the concept criticized - see here - and I was wondering if you could help me overcome the flaws in the movie's floating islands; namely the fact that
- A superconductor can't just give off a magnetic field without a current
- The magnetic field would have to be so big, dense and strong that it could be uninhabitable for humans
- I'd rather not just magic an RC superconductor onto the periodic table unless it theoretically could exist on my planet but not Earth
I would also like to know how such a huge magnetic field could be produced naturally. Some requirements:
- The floating boulders I want have to be able to exist as large as houses
- The planet must be habitable to non-extremophilic animal life
- It is a planet, not a moon of a gas giant - so no help from Jupiter-like planets with metallic hydrogen outer cores
science-based chemistry magnetism electromagnetism
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
James Cameron's Avatar featured floating mountains which stayed aloft due to the Meissner effect; they contained large quantities of the room-temperature superconductor unobtainium, which, due to their strong electromagnetic fields, were suspended above the ground.
Would this really work though? I've seen the concept criticized - see here - and I was wondering if you could help me overcome the flaws in the movie's floating islands; namely the fact that
- A superconductor can't just give off a magnetic field without a current
- The magnetic field would have to be so big, dense and strong that it could be uninhabitable for humans
- I'd rather not just magic an RC superconductor onto the periodic table unless it theoretically could exist on my planet but not Earth
I would also like to know how such a huge magnetic field could be produced naturally. Some requirements:
- The floating boulders I want have to be able to exist as large as houses
- The planet must be habitable to non-extremophilic animal life
- It is a planet, not a moon of a gas giant - so no help from Jupiter-like planets with metallic hydrogen outer cores
science-based chemistry magnetism electromagnetism
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The lazy solution is of course to remove the "natural" requirement. Someone could have built them because the awesomeness of floating mountains transcends species, or somesuch. The criticisms of superconducting islands are well founded, alas, so I don't think you'll have much luck working your way around them.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unless that whole chunk is magnetic, wouldn't the superconductor eventually break through the rock containing it (many tons of rock supported by only the tensile strength of the rock against the superconductor). It seems like over time everything would end up on the ground again, and the superconductor in space, or as a sheet around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Tyler S. Loeper
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
James Cameron's Avatar featured floating mountains which stayed aloft due to the Meissner effect; they contained large quantities of the room-temperature superconductor unobtainium, which, due to their strong electromagnetic fields, were suspended above the ground.
Would this really work though? I've seen the concept criticized - see here - and I was wondering if you could help me overcome the flaws in the movie's floating islands; namely the fact that
- A superconductor can't just give off a magnetic field without a current
- The magnetic field would have to be so big, dense and strong that it could be uninhabitable for humans
- I'd rather not just magic an RC superconductor onto the periodic table unless it theoretically could exist on my planet but not Earth
I would also like to know how such a huge magnetic field could be produced naturally. Some requirements:
- The floating boulders I want have to be able to exist as large as houses
- The planet must be habitable to non-extremophilic animal life
- It is a planet, not a moon of a gas giant - so no help from Jupiter-like planets with metallic hydrogen outer cores
science-based chemistry magnetism electromagnetism
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
$endgroup$
James Cameron's Avatar featured floating mountains which stayed aloft due to the Meissner effect; they contained large quantities of the room-temperature superconductor unobtainium, which, due to their strong electromagnetic fields, were suspended above the ground.
Would this really work though? I've seen the concept criticized - see here - and I was wondering if you could help me overcome the flaws in the movie's floating islands; namely the fact that
- A superconductor can't just give off a magnetic field without a current
- The magnetic field would have to be so big, dense and strong that it could be uninhabitable for humans
- I'd rather not just magic an RC superconductor onto the periodic table unless it theoretically could exist on my planet but not Earth
I would also like to know how such a huge magnetic field could be produced naturally. Some requirements:
- The floating boulders I want have to be able to exist as large as houses
- The planet must be habitable to non-extremophilic animal life
- It is a planet, not a moon of a gas giant - so no help from Jupiter-like planets with metallic hydrogen outer cores
science-based chemistry magnetism electromagnetism
science-based chemistry magnetism electromagnetism
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
asked 4 hours ago
SealBoiSealBoi
6,73812466
6,73812466
1
$begingroup$
The lazy solution is of course to remove the "natural" requirement. Someone could have built them because the awesomeness of floating mountains transcends species, or somesuch. The criticisms of superconducting islands are well founded, alas, so I don't think you'll have much luck working your way around them.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unless that whole chunk is magnetic, wouldn't the superconductor eventually break through the rock containing it (many tons of rock supported by only the tensile strength of the rock against the superconductor). It seems like over time everything would end up on the ground again, and the superconductor in space, or as a sheet around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Tyler S. Loeper
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The lazy solution is of course to remove the "natural" requirement. Someone could have built them because the awesomeness of floating mountains transcends species, or somesuch. The criticisms of superconducting islands are well founded, alas, so I don't think you'll have much luck working your way around them.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unless that whole chunk is magnetic, wouldn't the superconductor eventually break through the rock containing it (many tons of rock supported by only the tensile strength of the rock against the superconductor). It seems like over time everything would end up on the ground again, and the superconductor in space, or as a sheet around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Tyler S. Loeper
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The lazy solution is of course to remove the "natural" requirement. Someone could have built them because the awesomeness of floating mountains transcends species, or somesuch. The criticisms of superconducting islands are well founded, alas, so I don't think you'll have much luck working your way around them.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The lazy solution is of course to remove the "natural" requirement. Someone could have built them because the awesomeness of floating mountains transcends species, or somesuch. The criticisms of superconducting islands are well founded, alas, so I don't think you'll have much luck working your way around them.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unless that whole chunk is magnetic, wouldn't the superconductor eventually break through the rock containing it (many tons of rock supported by only the tensile strength of the rock against the superconductor). It seems like over time everything would end up on the ground again, and the superconductor in space, or as a sheet around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Tyler S. Loeper
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unless that whole chunk is magnetic, wouldn't the superconductor eventually break through the rock containing it (many tons of rock supported by only the tensile strength of the rock against the superconductor). It seems like over time everything would end up on the ground again, and the superconductor in space, or as a sheet around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Tyler S. Loeper
2 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Only those pieces of rock which contain a current can produce a magnetic field adequate to float in the planetary magnetic field.
Rocks will float at different distances from the surface depending on the strength of their internal current. Some might not float, but just be lighter than would be the case without the current. Some will be very high.
Some rocks obtain their initial current through lightning.
Rocks can maintain their current through induction. A conductor moving (falling or rising) thru a magnetic field will have a current induced within it. This induced current will produce a magnetic field opposing the one that produced it.
I conclude from videos of small animals being levitated that a magnetic field adequate to oppose gravity is not itself lethal.
ADDENDUM: Maybe Pandora floating rocks are very light?
I recently had opportunity to see the simulated world of Pandora in Orlando. They have some cool "floating" rocks.
I conclude that the "rocks" are a lot lighter than they look. Pumice is a tenth the mass of the same volume of limestone. Mayne the levitating rocks are light too.
A do not think there is an upper limit to magnetic fields. Magnetars have a lot. Questions about how much magnetic field can a given volume of mass host, or how much can a given magnetic field (or interacting magnetic fields) lift can be answered. One would need to understand magnetic flux density and I do not.
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avatar was a fun movie to watch, but a lot of it was fantasy
Can you float a superconductor without an external current? Sure you can. What you need is a strong enough magnetic field to induce the necessary current in the superconductor. for example, in that Youtube video, a neodymium magnet floats atop a super cold superconductor.
The problem you have is that planetary magnetospheres are insanely weak. The magnets holding your child's drawings on your fridge are 200X stronger than Earth's magnetosphere and you can't float a superconductor with a fridge magnet.
Does this stop you?
Not necessarily. You simply need to justify a strong enough magnetosphere that it would magnetize the fillings in a visitor's teeth.
Or do what Cameron did: ignore the details and tell a good story.
But, according to your question you don't want a magnetosphere of that strength. That leaves one answer: sorry, it can't be done based on the science we know today.
BTW, for fascinating insight into the idea of lethal magnetism, check out this post from our sister site, Physics.SE.
And then my memory kicked in
After answering this question, I realized it's a duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2. But since I've already answered this question, I'm not going to VTC.
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The magnetic force is much stronger than the gravitational force. Even a small magnet will easily hold a metal object a few times its mass.
Here is a video of common household objects being levitated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
On top of that the gravity on Pandora might be lower than that on Earth, and the rock less dense.
You can imagine layers of magnetic unobtanium separated by layers of ordinary rock. When the rock erodes, the like charged layers on unobtanium repel each other, thus resulting in floating rocks.
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143152%2fcan-the-meissner-effect-explain-very-large-floating-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Only those pieces of rock which contain a current can produce a magnetic field adequate to float in the planetary magnetic field.
Rocks will float at different distances from the surface depending on the strength of their internal current. Some might not float, but just be lighter than would be the case without the current. Some will be very high.
Some rocks obtain their initial current through lightning.
Rocks can maintain their current through induction. A conductor moving (falling or rising) thru a magnetic field will have a current induced within it. This induced current will produce a magnetic field opposing the one that produced it.
I conclude from videos of small animals being levitated that a magnetic field adequate to oppose gravity is not itself lethal.
ADDENDUM: Maybe Pandora floating rocks are very light?
I recently had opportunity to see the simulated world of Pandora in Orlando. They have some cool "floating" rocks.
I conclude that the "rocks" are a lot lighter than they look. Pumice is a tenth the mass of the same volume of limestone. Mayne the levitating rocks are light too.
A do not think there is an upper limit to magnetic fields. Magnetars have a lot. Questions about how much magnetic field can a given volume of mass host, or how much can a given magnetic field (or interacting magnetic fields) lift can be answered. One would need to understand magnetic flux density and I do not.
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only those pieces of rock which contain a current can produce a magnetic field adequate to float in the planetary magnetic field.
Rocks will float at different distances from the surface depending on the strength of their internal current. Some might not float, but just be lighter than would be the case without the current. Some will be very high.
Some rocks obtain their initial current through lightning.
Rocks can maintain their current through induction. A conductor moving (falling or rising) thru a magnetic field will have a current induced within it. This induced current will produce a magnetic field opposing the one that produced it.
I conclude from videos of small animals being levitated that a magnetic field adequate to oppose gravity is not itself lethal.
ADDENDUM: Maybe Pandora floating rocks are very light?
I recently had opportunity to see the simulated world of Pandora in Orlando. They have some cool "floating" rocks.
I conclude that the "rocks" are a lot lighter than they look. Pumice is a tenth the mass of the same volume of limestone. Mayne the levitating rocks are light too.
A do not think there is an upper limit to magnetic fields. Magnetars have a lot. Questions about how much magnetic field can a given volume of mass host, or how much can a given magnetic field (or interacting magnetic fields) lift can be answered. One would need to understand magnetic flux density and I do not.
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only those pieces of rock which contain a current can produce a magnetic field adequate to float in the planetary magnetic field.
Rocks will float at different distances from the surface depending on the strength of their internal current. Some might not float, but just be lighter than would be the case without the current. Some will be very high.
Some rocks obtain their initial current through lightning.
Rocks can maintain their current through induction. A conductor moving (falling or rising) thru a magnetic field will have a current induced within it. This induced current will produce a magnetic field opposing the one that produced it.
I conclude from videos of small animals being levitated that a magnetic field adequate to oppose gravity is not itself lethal.
ADDENDUM: Maybe Pandora floating rocks are very light?
I recently had opportunity to see the simulated world of Pandora in Orlando. They have some cool "floating" rocks.
I conclude that the "rocks" are a lot lighter than they look. Pumice is a tenth the mass of the same volume of limestone. Mayne the levitating rocks are light too.
A do not think there is an upper limit to magnetic fields. Magnetars have a lot. Questions about how much magnetic field can a given volume of mass host, or how much can a given magnetic field (or interacting magnetic fields) lift can be answered. One would need to understand magnetic flux density and I do not.
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
$endgroup$
Only those pieces of rock which contain a current can produce a magnetic field adequate to float in the planetary magnetic field.
Rocks will float at different distances from the surface depending on the strength of their internal current. Some might not float, but just be lighter than would be the case without the current. Some will be very high.
Some rocks obtain their initial current through lightning.
Rocks can maintain their current through induction. A conductor moving (falling or rising) thru a magnetic field will have a current induced within it. This induced current will produce a magnetic field opposing the one that produced it.
I conclude from videos of small animals being levitated that a magnetic field adequate to oppose gravity is not itself lethal.
ADDENDUM: Maybe Pandora floating rocks are very light?
I recently had opportunity to see the simulated world of Pandora in Orlando. They have some cool "floating" rocks.
I conclude that the "rocks" are a lot lighter than they look. Pumice is a tenth the mass of the same volume of limestone. Mayne the levitating rocks are light too.
A do not think there is an upper limit to magnetic fields. Magnetars have a lot. Questions about how much magnetic field can a given volume of mass host, or how much can a given magnetic field (or interacting magnetic fields) lift can be answered. One would need to understand magnetic flux density and I do not.
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
116k27219487
116k27219487
2
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
But is a magnetic field adequate to levitate, say, 20k metric tons lethal?
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avatar was a fun movie to watch, but a lot of it was fantasy
Can you float a superconductor without an external current? Sure you can. What you need is a strong enough magnetic field to induce the necessary current in the superconductor. for example, in that Youtube video, a neodymium magnet floats atop a super cold superconductor.
The problem you have is that planetary magnetospheres are insanely weak. The magnets holding your child's drawings on your fridge are 200X stronger than Earth's magnetosphere and you can't float a superconductor with a fridge magnet.
Does this stop you?
Not necessarily. You simply need to justify a strong enough magnetosphere that it would magnetize the fillings in a visitor's teeth.
Or do what Cameron did: ignore the details and tell a good story.
But, according to your question you don't want a magnetosphere of that strength. That leaves one answer: sorry, it can't be done based on the science we know today.
BTW, for fascinating insight into the idea of lethal magnetism, check out this post from our sister site, Physics.SE.
And then my memory kicked in
After answering this question, I realized it's a duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2. But since I've already answered this question, I'm not going to VTC.
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avatar was a fun movie to watch, but a lot of it was fantasy
Can you float a superconductor without an external current? Sure you can. What you need is a strong enough magnetic field to induce the necessary current in the superconductor. for example, in that Youtube video, a neodymium magnet floats atop a super cold superconductor.
The problem you have is that planetary magnetospheres are insanely weak. The magnets holding your child's drawings on your fridge are 200X stronger than Earth's magnetosphere and you can't float a superconductor with a fridge magnet.
Does this stop you?
Not necessarily. You simply need to justify a strong enough magnetosphere that it would magnetize the fillings in a visitor's teeth.
Or do what Cameron did: ignore the details and tell a good story.
But, according to your question you don't want a magnetosphere of that strength. That leaves one answer: sorry, it can't be done based on the science we know today.
BTW, for fascinating insight into the idea of lethal magnetism, check out this post from our sister site, Physics.SE.
And then my memory kicked in
After answering this question, I realized it's a duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2. But since I've already answered this question, I'm not going to VTC.
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avatar was a fun movie to watch, but a lot of it was fantasy
Can you float a superconductor without an external current? Sure you can. What you need is a strong enough magnetic field to induce the necessary current in the superconductor. for example, in that Youtube video, a neodymium magnet floats atop a super cold superconductor.
The problem you have is that planetary magnetospheres are insanely weak. The magnets holding your child's drawings on your fridge are 200X stronger than Earth's magnetosphere and you can't float a superconductor with a fridge magnet.
Does this stop you?
Not necessarily. You simply need to justify a strong enough magnetosphere that it would magnetize the fillings in a visitor's teeth.
Or do what Cameron did: ignore the details and tell a good story.
But, according to your question you don't want a magnetosphere of that strength. That leaves one answer: sorry, it can't be done based on the science we know today.
BTW, for fascinating insight into the idea of lethal magnetism, check out this post from our sister site, Physics.SE.
And then my memory kicked in
After answering this question, I realized it's a duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2. But since I've already answered this question, I'm not going to VTC.
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
$endgroup$
Avatar was a fun movie to watch, but a lot of it was fantasy
Can you float a superconductor without an external current? Sure you can. What you need is a strong enough magnetic field to induce the necessary current in the superconductor. for example, in that Youtube video, a neodymium magnet floats atop a super cold superconductor.
The problem you have is that planetary magnetospheres are insanely weak. The magnets holding your child's drawings on your fridge are 200X stronger than Earth's magnetosphere and you can't float a superconductor with a fridge magnet.
Does this stop you?
Not necessarily. You simply need to justify a strong enough magnetosphere that it would magnetize the fillings in a visitor's teeth.
Or do what Cameron did: ignore the details and tell a good story.
But, according to your question you don't want a magnetosphere of that strength. That leaves one answer: sorry, it can't be done based on the science we know today.
BTW, for fascinating insight into the idea of lethal magnetism, check out this post from our sister site, Physics.SE.
And then my memory kicked in
After answering this question, I realized it's a duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2. But since I've already answered this question, I'm not going to VTC.
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
47.8k699223
47.8k699223
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The magnetic force is much stronger than the gravitational force. Even a small magnet will easily hold a metal object a few times its mass.
Here is a video of common household objects being levitated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
On top of that the gravity on Pandora might be lower than that on Earth, and the rock less dense.
You can imagine layers of magnetic unobtanium separated by layers of ordinary rock. When the rock erodes, the like charged layers on unobtanium repel each other, thus resulting in floating rocks.
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The magnetic force is much stronger than the gravitational force. Even a small magnet will easily hold a metal object a few times its mass.
Here is a video of common household objects being levitated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
On top of that the gravity on Pandora might be lower than that on Earth, and the rock less dense.
You can imagine layers of magnetic unobtanium separated by layers of ordinary rock. When the rock erodes, the like charged layers on unobtanium repel each other, thus resulting in floating rocks.
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The magnetic force is much stronger than the gravitational force. Even a small magnet will easily hold a metal object a few times its mass.
Here is a video of common household objects being levitated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
On top of that the gravity on Pandora might be lower than that on Earth, and the rock less dense.
You can imagine layers of magnetic unobtanium separated by layers of ordinary rock. When the rock erodes, the like charged layers on unobtanium repel each other, thus resulting in floating rocks.
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
$endgroup$
The magnetic force is much stronger than the gravitational force. Even a small magnet will easily hold a metal object a few times its mass.
Here is a video of common household objects being levitated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
On top of that the gravity on Pandora might be lower than that on Earth, and the rock less dense.
You can imagine layers of magnetic unobtanium separated by layers of ordinary rock. When the rock erodes, the like charged layers on unobtanium repel each other, thus resulting in floating rocks.
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
answered 2 hours ago
ventsyvventsyv
3,437417
3,437417
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143152%2fcan-the-meissner-effect-explain-very-large-floating-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The lazy solution is of course to remove the "natural" requirement. Someone could have built them because the awesomeness of floating mountains transcends species, or somesuch. The criticisms of superconducting islands are well founded, alas, so I don't think you'll have much luck working your way around them.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unless that whole chunk is magnetic, wouldn't the superconductor eventually break through the rock containing it (many tons of rock supported by only the tensile strength of the rock against the superconductor). It seems like over time everything would end up on the ground again, and the superconductor in space, or as a sheet around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Tyler S. Loeper
2 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Floating cities with a new superconductor v2
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago