Amorphous proper classes in MKWhat sort of structure can amorphous sets support?Splitting infinite setsFor models of ZF, if for some $A$ we have $L[A] = L$, what can we deduce about $A$?What sort of structure can amorphous sets support?Some questions about Ackermann set theoryHartogs number and the three power setsCan $mathbbR$ be partitioned into dedekind-finite sets?How many Dedekind-finite sets can $mathbbR$ be partitioned into?Can ZFC be interpreted in a set theory having finitely many ranks?An axiom for collecting proper classesDo choice principles in all generic extensions imply AC in $V$?

Amorphous proper classes in MK


What sort of structure can amorphous sets support?Splitting infinite setsFor models of ZF, if for some $A$ we have $L[A] = L$, what can we deduce about $A$?What sort of structure can amorphous sets support?Some questions about Ackermann set theoryHartogs number and the three power setsCan $mathbbR$ be partitioned into dedekind-finite sets?How many Dedekind-finite sets can $mathbbR$ be partitioned into?Can ZFC be interpreted in a set theory having finitely many ranks?An axiom for collecting proper classesDo choice principles in all generic extensions imply AC in $V$?













4












$begingroup$


Working in $ZFC$ every cardinal is either finite or in bijection with a proper subset of itself (Dedekind infinite). Without Choice it is consistent that there are infinite sets which can't be partitioned into two infinite subsets (amorphous sets), so the above statement no longer holds since a bijection to a proper subset implies a partition into two disjoint infinite subsets as proven on the wiki -- all of this is discussed in the question and answers here much more succinctly.




Is it consistent in $MK$ without Global Choice that there are amorphous proper classes, meaning proper classes which can't be partitioned into two proper class sized subclasses?




Directly generalizing the argument given on the wiki article for amorphous sets seems to require a notion of transfinite function composition which can be defined in good categorical generality using colimits, but it is not immediately apparent how to generalize the recursive definition of the $S_i$'s for limit ordinal $i$ since the given definitions depend on immediate predecessor steps.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Working in $ZFC$ every cardinal is either finite or in bijection with a proper subset of itself (Dedekind infinite). Without Choice it is consistent that there are infinite sets which can't be partitioned into two infinite subsets (amorphous sets), so the above statement no longer holds since a bijection to a proper subset implies a partition into two disjoint infinite subsets as proven on the wiki -- all of this is discussed in the question and answers here much more succinctly.




    Is it consistent in $MK$ without Global Choice that there are amorphous proper classes, meaning proper classes which can't be partitioned into two proper class sized subclasses?




    Directly generalizing the argument given on the wiki article for amorphous sets seems to require a notion of transfinite function composition which can be defined in good categorical generality using colimits, but it is not immediately apparent how to generalize the recursive definition of the $S_i$'s for limit ordinal $i$ since the given definitions depend on immediate predecessor steps.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Working in $ZFC$ every cardinal is either finite or in bijection with a proper subset of itself (Dedekind infinite). Without Choice it is consistent that there are infinite sets which can't be partitioned into two infinite subsets (amorphous sets), so the above statement no longer holds since a bijection to a proper subset implies a partition into two disjoint infinite subsets as proven on the wiki -- all of this is discussed in the question and answers here much more succinctly.




      Is it consistent in $MK$ without Global Choice that there are amorphous proper classes, meaning proper classes which can't be partitioned into two proper class sized subclasses?




      Directly generalizing the argument given on the wiki article for amorphous sets seems to require a notion of transfinite function composition which can be defined in good categorical generality using colimits, but it is not immediately apparent how to generalize the recursive definition of the $S_i$'s for limit ordinal $i$ since the given definitions depend on immediate predecessor steps.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Working in $ZFC$ every cardinal is either finite or in bijection with a proper subset of itself (Dedekind infinite). Without Choice it is consistent that there are infinite sets which can't be partitioned into two infinite subsets (amorphous sets), so the above statement no longer holds since a bijection to a proper subset implies a partition into two disjoint infinite subsets as proven on the wiki -- all of this is discussed in the question and answers here much more succinctly.




      Is it consistent in $MK$ without Global Choice that there are amorphous proper classes, meaning proper classes which can't be partitioned into two proper class sized subclasses?




      Directly generalizing the argument given on the wiki article for amorphous sets seems to require a notion of transfinite function composition which can be defined in good categorical generality using colimits, but it is not immediately apparent how to generalize the recursive definition of the $S_i$'s for limit ordinal $i$ since the given definitions depend on immediate predecessor steps.







      set-theory lo.logic axiom-of-choice






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      David Roberts

      17.5k463177




      17.5k463177










      asked 4 hours ago









      Alec RheaAlec Rhea

      1,3331819




      1,3331819




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Unless I'm missing something, the answer is no: we have a surjection $s$ from a given proper class to the class of ordinals - sending each element to its rank and then "collapsing" appropriately - and this lets us partition the original class into two proper classes, for example $s^-1(limits)$ versus $s^-1(successors)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
            $endgroup$
            – David Roberts
            1 hour ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
            $endgroup$
            – Alec Rhea
            48 mins ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I guess I am uncool as well...
            $endgroup$
            – Andrés E. Caicedo
            44 mins ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325796%2famorphous-proper-classes-in-mk%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          Unless I'm missing something, the answer is no: we have a surjection $s$ from a given proper class to the class of ordinals - sending each element to its rank and then "collapsing" appropriately - and this lets us partition the original class into two proper classes, for example $s^-1(limits)$ versus $s^-1(successors)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
            $endgroup$
            – David Roberts
            1 hour ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
            $endgroup$
            – Alec Rhea
            48 mins ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I guess I am uncool as well...
            $endgroup$
            – Andrés E. Caicedo
            44 mins ago















          5












          $begingroup$

          Unless I'm missing something, the answer is no: we have a surjection $s$ from a given proper class to the class of ordinals - sending each element to its rank and then "collapsing" appropriately - and this lets us partition the original class into two proper classes, for example $s^-1(limits)$ versus $s^-1(successors)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
            $endgroup$
            – David Roberts
            1 hour ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
            $endgroup$
            – Alec Rhea
            48 mins ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I guess I am uncool as well...
            $endgroup$
            – Andrés E. Caicedo
            44 mins ago













          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Unless I'm missing something, the answer is no: we have a surjection $s$ from a given proper class to the class of ordinals - sending each element to its rank and then "collapsing" appropriately - and this lets us partition the original class into two proper classes, for example $s^-1(limits)$ versus $s^-1(successors)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Unless I'm missing something, the answer is no: we have a surjection $s$ from a given proper class to the class of ordinals - sending each element to its rank and then "collapsing" appropriately - and this lets us partition the original class into two proper classes, for example $s^-1(limits)$ versus $s^-1(successors)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 4 hours ago









          Noah SchweberNoah Schweber

          19.5k349146




          19.5k349146







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
            $endgroup$
            – David Roberts
            1 hour ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
            $endgroup$
            – Alec Rhea
            48 mins ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I guess I am uncool as well...
            $endgroup$
            – Andrés E. Caicedo
            44 mins ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila
            3 hours ago






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
            $endgroup$
            – David Roberts
            1 hour ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
            $endgroup$
            – Alec Rhea
            48 mins ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            I guess I am uncool as well...
            $endgroup$
            – Andrés E. Caicedo
            44 mins ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Alec: In that case the answer is positive. Just do Fraenkel's model over a proper class of atoms.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          3 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Alec: That's the OG model for amorphous sets. Just remember that ZFA (or ZFU) is equivalent to ZF-Foundation with Quine atoms for the atoms.
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Karagila
          3 hours ago




          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
          $endgroup$
          – David Roberts
          1 hour ago





          $begingroup$
          @Noah Asaf is calling you uncool for not knowing.
          $endgroup$
          – David Roberts
          1 hour ago





          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
          $endgroup$
          – Alec Rhea
          48 mins ago





          $begingroup$
          Hahah, it’s an abbreviation for the american colloquialism “original gangster” meaning a member of the original older generation of badasses in a given gang/discipline of mathematics.
          $endgroup$
          – Alec Rhea
          48 mins ago





          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          I guess I am uncool as well...
          $endgroup$
          – Andrés E. Caicedo
          44 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          I guess I am uncool as well...
          $endgroup$
          – Andrés E. Caicedo
          44 mins ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325796%2famorphous-proper-classes-in-mk%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

          Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп

          ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result