Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy

Capacitor electron flow

Sort with assumptions

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory

How to preserve electronics (computers, ipads, phones) for hundreds of years?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

If the Dominion rule using their Jem'Hadar troops, why is their life expectancy so low?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep

Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?

What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?

Can you take a "free object interaction" while incapacitated?

categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Output visual diagram of picture

How to get directions in deep space?



Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?


(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy













5












$begingroup$


I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



    Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



    For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



    Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



    So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.







      search-algorithms hash-tables permutations






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 6 hours ago









      SmileyCraftSmileyCraft

      1261




      1261




      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "419"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago















          2












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Apass.JackApass.Jack

          13k1939




          13k1939











          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago
















          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago















          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          2 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          1 hour ago












          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          1 hour ago










          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

          Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

          Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery