Is the argument below valid? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Which kinds of Philosophy.SE questions should be taken from (or tolerated in)…How does one contradiction in argument makes the argument valid?In formal logic, how is it possible for an argument with a contradictory conclusion to be valid?The validity of the definition of a valid argumentWhy is this argument valid?Is this a valid argument?Determine if an argument is valid or invalidConcerning the definition of “valid”What is the difference between a conditional and material implication?How is “~A. Therefore A -> B” a valid argument?Is this argument valid?

Letter Boxed validator

Disable hyphenation for an entire paragraph

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

Is there a concise way to say "all of the X, one of each"?

What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?

How much radiation do nuclear physics experiments expose researchers to nowadays?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Did Xerox really develop the first LAN?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Sorting numerically

What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?

What makes black pepper strong or mild?

G-Code for resetting to 100% speed

Why is black pepper both grey and black?

What is a Meta algorithm?

Diagram with tikz

What's the purpose of writing one's academic bio in 3rd person?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?

What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?

Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?



Is the argument below valid?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Which kinds of Philosophy.SE questions should be taken from (or tolerated in)…How does one contradiction in argument makes the argument valid?In formal logic, how is it possible for an argument with a contradictory conclusion to be valid?The validity of the definition of a valid argumentWhy is this argument valid?Is this a valid argument?Determine if an argument is valid or invalidConcerning the definition of “valid”What is the difference between a conditional and material implication?How is “~A. Therefore A -> B” a valid argument?Is this argument valid?










1
















If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need
a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




Is this argument valid?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I made an edit. You may roll this back if it does not represent your view by clicking on the "edited" link above my image and then on a rollback link. Welcome!

    – Frank Hubeny
    10 hours ago















1
















If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need
a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




Is this argument valid?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I made an edit. You may roll this back if it does not represent your view by clicking on the "edited" link above my image and then on a rollback link. Welcome!

    – Frank Hubeny
    10 hours ago













1












1








1









If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need
a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




Is this argument valid?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need
a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




Is this argument valid?







logic






share|improve this question









New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Frank Hubeny

10.5k51558




10.5k51558






New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 10 hours ago









Bruce Grayton Toodeep MuzawaziBruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi

61




61




New contributor




Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I made an edit. You may roll this back if it does not represent your view by clicking on the "edited" link above my image and then on a rollback link. Welcome!

    – Frank Hubeny
    10 hours ago

















  • I made an edit. You may roll this back if it does not represent your view by clicking on the "edited" link above my image and then on a rollback link. Welcome!

    – Frank Hubeny
    10 hours ago
















I made an edit. You may roll this back if it does not represent your view by clicking on the "edited" link above my image and then on a rollback link. Welcome!

– Frank Hubeny
10 hours ago





I made an edit. You may roll this back if it does not represent your view by clicking on the "edited" link above my image and then on a rollback link. Welcome!

– Frank Hubeny
10 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4















Is the argument valid?




No.



"I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house" is the same as "If I do not buy a house, then I will not need a loan".



This is not implied by "If I buy a house, I will need a loan".



See Denying the antecedent.






share|improve this answer






























    2














    Wikipedia describes validity as follows:




    In logic, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false.




    The argument we want to test for validity is the following:




    If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




    This can be broken up into propositions with this symbolization key:



    • R: "Interest rates go down."

    • B: "I will buy a house."

    • L: "I will need a loan."

    If R then B. If B then L. Therefore, if not B then not L.



    We could place the following into a truth table generator. For the truth table generator I am using I would enter the following string:




    ((R=>B)&&(B=>L))=>(~B=>~L)




    This is the result I get:



    enter image description here



    Note the "F" in the third line of the table. This is a line where the premises are true but the conclusion false. Therefore the argument is invalid.




    Stanford Truth Table Tool http://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/



    Wikipedia contributors. (2019, March 28). Validity (logic). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:05, April 15, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Validity_(logic)&oldid=889899195






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "265"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61847%2fis-the-argument-below-valid%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4















      Is the argument valid?




      No.



      "I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house" is the same as "If I do not buy a house, then I will not need a loan".



      This is not implied by "If I buy a house, I will need a loan".



      See Denying the antecedent.






      share|improve this answer



























        4















        Is the argument valid?




        No.



        "I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house" is the same as "If I do not buy a house, then I will not need a loan".



        This is not implied by "If I buy a house, I will need a loan".



        See Denying the antecedent.






        share|improve this answer

























          4












          4








          4








          Is the argument valid?




          No.



          "I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house" is the same as "If I do not buy a house, then I will not need a loan".



          This is not implied by "If I buy a house, I will need a loan".



          See Denying the antecedent.






          share|improve this answer














          Is the argument valid?




          No.



          "I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house" is the same as "If I do not buy a house, then I will not need a loan".



          This is not implied by "If I buy a house, I will need a loan".



          See Denying the antecedent.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 10 hours ago









          Mauro ALLEGRANZAMauro ALLEGRANZA

          29.7k22065




          29.7k22065





















              2














              Wikipedia describes validity as follows:




              In logic, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false.




              The argument we want to test for validity is the following:




              If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




              This can be broken up into propositions with this symbolization key:



              • R: "Interest rates go down."

              • B: "I will buy a house."

              • L: "I will need a loan."

              If R then B. If B then L. Therefore, if not B then not L.



              We could place the following into a truth table generator. For the truth table generator I am using I would enter the following string:




              ((R=>B)&&(B=>L))=>(~B=>~L)




              This is the result I get:



              enter image description here



              Note the "F" in the third line of the table. This is a line where the premises are true but the conclusion false. Therefore the argument is invalid.




              Stanford Truth Table Tool http://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/



              Wikipedia contributors. (2019, March 28). Validity (logic). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:05, April 15, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Validity_(logic)&oldid=889899195






              share|improve this answer



























                2














                Wikipedia describes validity as follows:




                In logic, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false.




                The argument we want to test for validity is the following:




                If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




                This can be broken up into propositions with this symbolization key:



                • R: "Interest rates go down."

                • B: "I will buy a house."

                • L: "I will need a loan."

                If R then B. If B then L. Therefore, if not B then not L.



                We could place the following into a truth table generator. For the truth table generator I am using I would enter the following string:




                ((R=>B)&&(B=>L))=>(~B=>~L)




                This is the result I get:



                enter image description here



                Note the "F" in the third line of the table. This is a line where the premises are true but the conclusion false. Therefore the argument is invalid.




                Stanford Truth Table Tool http://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/



                Wikipedia contributors. (2019, March 28). Validity (logic). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:05, April 15, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Validity_(logic)&oldid=889899195






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  Wikipedia describes validity as follows:




                  In logic, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false.




                  The argument we want to test for validity is the following:




                  If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




                  This can be broken up into propositions with this symbolization key:



                  • R: "Interest rates go down."

                  • B: "I will buy a house."

                  • L: "I will need a loan."

                  If R then B. If B then L. Therefore, if not B then not L.



                  We could place the following into a truth table generator. For the truth table generator I am using I would enter the following string:




                  ((R=>B)&&(B=>L))=>(~B=>~L)




                  This is the result I get:



                  enter image description here



                  Note the "F" in the third line of the table. This is a line where the premises are true but the conclusion false. Therefore the argument is invalid.




                  Stanford Truth Table Tool http://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/



                  Wikipedia contributors. (2019, March 28). Validity (logic). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:05, April 15, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Validity_(logic)&oldid=889899195






                  share|improve this answer













                  Wikipedia describes validity as follows:




                  In logic, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false.




                  The argument we want to test for validity is the following:




                  If interest rates go down, then I will buy a house. If I buy a house, I will need a loan. Therefore, I will not need a loan if I do not buy a house.




                  This can be broken up into propositions with this symbolization key:



                  • R: "Interest rates go down."

                  • B: "I will buy a house."

                  • L: "I will need a loan."

                  If R then B. If B then L. Therefore, if not B then not L.



                  We could place the following into a truth table generator. For the truth table generator I am using I would enter the following string:




                  ((R=>B)&&(B=>L))=>(~B=>~L)




                  This is the result I get:



                  enter image description here



                  Note the "F" in the third line of the table. This is a line where the premises are true but the conclusion false. Therefore the argument is invalid.




                  Stanford Truth Table Tool http://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/



                  Wikipedia contributors. (2019, March 28). Validity (logic). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:05, April 15, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Validity_(logic)&oldid=889899195







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 10 hours ago









                  Frank HubenyFrank Hubeny

                  10.5k51558




                  10.5k51558




















                      Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Bruce Grayton Toodeep Muzawazi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61847%2fis-the-argument-below-valid%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

                      Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп

                      ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result