How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)Are there actually any advantages to Android full-disk encryption?Android / CyanogenMod encryption vs GNU/LinuxEncrypted files storage. How to simplify the password management scheme?How is the FileVault master key protected?Is it possible to retrieve flash-based encrypted disks content (SSD, cellphones, USB sticks, …) after password wipe/replacement?How to correctly handle passwords for an Android appBest practice for securing encrypted content on Android appHow does Android 6 full encryption work … when it doesn't ask for the password at start time?How can Android encryption be so fast?Connection between PIN/password and encryption keys in Android

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

N.B. ligature in Latex

A Journey Through Space and Time

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Is there a minimum number of transactions in a block?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

The magic money tree problem

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

What does "enim et" mean?

Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?

Should I join an office cleaning event for free?

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Chess with symmetric move-square

Example of a relative pronoun

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?



How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)


Are there actually any advantages to Android full-disk encryption?Android / CyanogenMod encryption vs GNU/LinuxEncrypted files storage. How to simplify the password management scheme?How is the FileVault master key protected?Is it possible to retrieve flash-based encrypted disks content (SSD, cellphones, USB sticks, …) after password wipe/replacement?How to correctly handle passwords for an Android appBest practice for securing encrypted content on Android appHow does Android 6 full encryption work … when it doesn't ask for the password at start time?How can Android encryption be so fast?Connection between PIN/password and encryption keys in Android






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9















There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    2 hours ago

















9















There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    2 hours ago













9












9








9


1






There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?






encryption passwords android disk-encryption macosx






share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Moshe Katz

486311




486311






New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









Filipp W.Filipp W.

1485




1485




New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    2 hours ago

















  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    2 hours ago
















I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

– forest
2 hours ago





I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

– forest
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11














At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4





    It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

    – vidarlo
    13 hours ago











  • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

    – AndrolGenhald
    12 hours ago











  • That, I do not disagree with :)

    – vidarlo
    12 hours ago


















4














I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




  • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




    • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


    • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

    • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


  • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



  • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



  1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


  2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


  3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "162"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206979%2fhow-is-it-possible-for-users-password-to-be-changed-after-storage-was-encrypted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 4





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      13 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      12 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      12 hours ago















    11














    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 4





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      13 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      12 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      12 hours ago













    11












    11








    11







    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






    share|improve this answer













    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 13 hours ago









    AndrolGenhaldAndrolGenhald

    12k52838




    12k52838







    • 4





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      13 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      12 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      12 hours ago












    • 4





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      13 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      12 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      12 hours ago







    4




    4





    It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

    – vidarlo
    13 hours ago





    It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

    – vidarlo
    13 hours ago













    @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

    – AndrolGenhald
    12 hours ago





    @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

    – AndrolGenhald
    12 hours ago













    That, I do not disagree with :)

    – vidarlo
    12 hours ago





    That, I do not disagree with :)

    – vidarlo
    12 hours ago













    4














    I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



    Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




    • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




      • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


      • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

      • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


    • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



    • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

    Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



    1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


    2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


    3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      4














      I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



      Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




      • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




        • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


        • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

        • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


      • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



      • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

      Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



      1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


      2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


      3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        4












        4








        4







        I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



        Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




        • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




          • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


          • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

          • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


        • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



        • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

        Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



        1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


        2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


        3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



        Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




        • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




          • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


          • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

          • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


        • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



        • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

        Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



        1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


        2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


        3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 10 hours ago





















        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 10 hours ago









        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534

        412




        412




        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206979%2fhow-is-it-possible-for-users-password-to-be-changed-after-storage-was-encrypted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

            Partai Komunis Tiongkok Daftar isi Kepemimpinan | Pranala luar | Referensi | Menu navigasidiperiksa1 perubahan tertundacpc.people.com.cnSitus resmiSurat kabar resmi"Why the Communist Party is alive, well and flourishing in China"0307-1235"Full text of Constitution of Communist Party of China"smengembangkannyas

            ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result