Why do the resolve message appear first? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live! The [wrap] tag is in the process of being burninatedWhy is using “for…in” with array iteration a bad idea?How do I make the first letter of a string uppercase in JavaScript?What is JSONP, and why was it created?Why does Google prepend while(1); to their JSON responses?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?What is TypeScript and why would I use it in place of JavaScript?ECMAScript 6 Chaining PromisesjQuery deferred.notify not workingjQuery Deferred continue to resolve after fail handlerCatching All Promise Rejections in an Async Function in JavaScript

How to convince students of the implication truth values?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

How could we fake a moon landing now?

What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?

What is the meaning of the simile “quick as silk”?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Around usage results

Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?

Do square wave exist?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

How to down pick a chord with skipped strings?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

Trademark violation for app?



Why do the resolve message appear first?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
The [wrap] tag is in the process of being burninatedWhy is using “for…in” with array iteration a bad idea?How do I make the first letter of a string uppercase in JavaScript?What is JSONP, and why was it created?Why does Google prepend while(1); to their JSON responses?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?What is TypeScript and why would I use it in place of JavaScript?ECMAScript 6 Chaining PromisesjQuery deferred.notify not workingjQuery Deferred continue to resolve after fail handlerCatching All Promise Rejections in an Async Function in JavaScript



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in Javascript. I was in the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I did expect the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    2 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    2 hours ago






  • 3





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    2 hours ago

















11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in Javascript. I was in the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I did expect the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    2 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    2 hours ago






  • 3





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    2 hours ago













11












11








11


3






I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in Javascript. I was in the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I did expect the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question
















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in Javascript. I was in the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I did expect the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"






javascript es6-promise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Edwin

















asked 2 hours ago









EdwinEdwin

614




614







  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    2 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    2 hours ago






  • 3





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    2 hours ago












  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    2 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    2 hours ago






  • 3





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    2 hours ago







3




3





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
2 hours ago





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
2 hours ago













You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

– Kev
2 hours ago





You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

– Kev
2 hours ago




4




4





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
2 hours ago





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
2 hours ago




2




2





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
2 hours ago





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
2 hours ago




3




3





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
2 hours ago





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
2 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago


















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    1 hour ago


















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago


















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 

let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)







share|improve this answer























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    1 hour ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-do-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago













4












4








4







You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









ludovicoludovico

875




875












  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago

















  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago
















i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
1 hour ago





i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
1 hour ago













2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    1 hour ago















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    1 hour ago













2












2








2







The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer













The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









Esdras XavierEsdras Xavier

45017




45017







  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    1 hour ago












  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    1 hour ago







1




1





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
1 hour ago





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
1 hour ago




1




1





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
1 hour ago





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
1 hour ago











0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago













0












0








0







Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer













Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









Yanis-gitYanis-git

2,6291725




2,6291725












  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago

















  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    1 hour ago
















@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
1 hour ago





@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
1 hour ago











0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 

let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)







share|improve this answer























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    1 hour ago















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 

let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)







share|improve this answer























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    1 hour ago













0












0








0







I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 

let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)







share|improve this answer













I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 

let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









EdwinEdwin

614




614












  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    1 hour ago

















  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    1 hour ago
















I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
1 hour ago





I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
1 hour ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-do-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery