Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How did Windows ME “cripple” DOS?Do you need to allocate memory before you use it in MS-DOS?Where did DOS store graphics fonts?Is DOS being shipped with or as an installed OS?Where was MS-DOS used?Why did MS-DOS choose percent symbol to designate variable?Why did DOS use dollar-terminated strings?Is there a reason why MS-DOS didn't use more English words for commands?How to convert .ttf to .fnt for use with M10_SCR.COM DOS font driverAlternatives for TurboVision on DOS
Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot
Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?
Declining "dulcis" in context
Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
Do square wave exist?
How to tell that you are a giant?
How can I use the Python library networkx from Mathematica?
Is safe to use va_start macro with this as parameter?
On SQL Server, is it possible to restrict certain users from using certain functions, operators or statements?
Where are Serre’s lectures at Collège de France to be found?
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
What is the escape velocity of a neutron particle (not neutron star)
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
Can you use the Shield Master feat to shove someone before you make an attack by using a Readied action?
Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?
What is the meaning of the simile “quick as silk”?
Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?
Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How did Windows ME “cripple” DOS?Do you need to allocate memory before you use it in MS-DOS?Where did DOS store graphics fonts?Is DOS being shipped with or as an installed OS?Where was MS-DOS used?Why did MS-DOS choose percent symbol to designate variable?Why did DOS use dollar-terminated strings?Is there a reason why MS-DOS didn't use more English words for commands?How to convert .ttf to .fnt for use with M10_SCR.COM DOS font driverAlternatives for TurboVision on DOS
I know that it was possible to create blinking text, but did the operating system itself (I mean, in output from functions of command.com and similar executables) ever make use of blink formatting?
You'd think it would be useful for confirmations of really dangerous things like format C: and such, but perhaps also seen as "over the top" and or just not necessary.
ms-dos
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
add a comment |
I know that it was possible to create blinking text, but did the operating system itself (I mean, in output from functions of command.com and similar executables) ever make use of blink formatting?
You'd think it would be useful for confirmations of really dangerous things like format C: and such, but perhaps also seen as "over the top" and or just not necessary.
ms-dos
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
add a comment |
I know that it was possible to create blinking text, but did the operating system itself (I mean, in output from functions of command.com and similar executables) ever make use of blink formatting?
You'd think it would be useful for confirmations of really dangerous things like format C: and such, but perhaps also seen as "over the top" and or just not necessary.
ms-dos
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
I know that it was possible to create blinking text, but did the operating system itself (I mean, in output from functions of command.com and similar executables) ever make use of blink formatting?
You'd think it would be useful for confirmations of really dangerous things like format C: and such, but perhaps also seen as "over the top" and or just not necessary.
ms-dos
ms-dos
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
asked 3 hours ago
KlaymenDKKlaymenDK
22817
22817
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
[...] did the operating system itself [...] ever make use of blink formatting?
No.
MS-DOS was, at the core, machine agnostic. It only used the most basic features provided by the BIOS. While function 09h would have provided the ability to set attributes (via BL), its meaning already varies across video cards offered by IBM and even more so with third party cards or non IBM machines. Not to mention that MS-DOS was intended to work with terminals as well, where attributes are even more diverse.
MS-DOS only used the most basic characters for output control:
- CR
- LF
- FF (clear screen)
- BEL
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
2
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9724%2fdid-ms-dos-itself-ever-use-blinking-text%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
[...] did the operating system itself [...] ever make use of blink formatting?
No.
MS-DOS was, at the core, machine agnostic. It only used the most basic features provided by the BIOS. While function 09h would have provided the ability to set attributes (via BL), its meaning already varies across video cards offered by IBM and even more so with third party cards or non IBM machines. Not to mention that MS-DOS was intended to work with terminals as well, where attributes are even more diverse.
MS-DOS only used the most basic characters for output control:
- CR
- LF
- FF (clear screen)
- BEL
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
2
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
add a comment |
[...] did the operating system itself [...] ever make use of blink formatting?
No.
MS-DOS was, at the core, machine agnostic. It only used the most basic features provided by the BIOS. While function 09h would have provided the ability to set attributes (via BL), its meaning already varies across video cards offered by IBM and even more so with third party cards or non IBM machines. Not to mention that MS-DOS was intended to work with terminals as well, where attributes are even more diverse.
MS-DOS only used the most basic characters for output control:
- CR
- LF
- FF (clear screen)
- BEL
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
2
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
add a comment |
[...] did the operating system itself [...] ever make use of blink formatting?
No.
MS-DOS was, at the core, machine agnostic. It only used the most basic features provided by the BIOS. While function 09h would have provided the ability to set attributes (via BL), its meaning already varies across video cards offered by IBM and even more so with third party cards or non IBM machines. Not to mention that MS-DOS was intended to work with terminals as well, where attributes are even more diverse.
MS-DOS only used the most basic characters for output control:
- CR
- LF
- FF (clear screen)
- BEL
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
[...] did the operating system itself [...] ever make use of blink formatting?
No.
MS-DOS was, at the core, machine agnostic. It only used the most basic features provided by the BIOS. While function 09h would have provided the ability to set attributes (via BL), its meaning already varies across video cards offered by IBM and even more so with third party cards or non IBM machines. Not to mention that MS-DOS was intended to work with terminals as well, where attributes are even more diverse.
MS-DOS only used the most basic characters for output control:
- CR
- LF
- FF (clear screen)
- BEL
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
answered 2 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
56.7k6137228
56.7k6137228
2
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
2
2
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
MS-DOS 2.0 to 5.x included a driver called ANSI.SYS which provided support for escape codes to control character attributes; I'm pretty certain escape-leftbracket-5m was supported as a means of enabling blinking, along with ...[1m for bright text, ...[30m to ...[37m for foreground color, etc.
– supercat
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
@supercat Jup, another optional add-on, nothing a cor OS can rely on.
– Raffzahn
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9724%2fdid-ms-dos-itself-ever-use-blinking-text%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
