YOLO: What is better? multiple networks per label or multiple labels in single network? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAny differences in regularisation in MLP between batch and individual updates?In Neural Networks and deep neural networks what does label-dropout meanBatching in Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) when there is only a single instance per time step?What is the way to modify a neural network classifier to deal with sample points from outside of the label set?

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions

Monty Hall variation

Can I write a for loop that iterates over both collections and arrays?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?

Patience, young "Padovan"

What function has this graph?

Spanish for "widget"

How to reverse every other sublist of a list?

Does duplicating a spell with wish count as casting that spell?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

How long do I have to send payment?

"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?



YOLO: What is better? multiple networks per label or multiple labels in single network?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAny differences in regularisation in MLP between batch and individual updates?In Neural Networks and deep neural networks what does label-dropout meanBatching in Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) when there is only a single instance per time step?What is the way to modify a neural network classifier to deal with sample points from outside of the label set?










1












$begingroup$


I would like to use a YOLO network, retrain it to recognize say, 20 labels.



Would adding labels to a single network in training reduce its accurary?



Would it be better to train multiple models on 5,10 and 5 labels respectively.



e.g.



Model A : recognizes 5 labels (ferrari,honda,ford,toyota,tesla)
Model B : regonzies 10 labels (store front / stopsign, speed sign, super charger station , etccc. )
Model C : recongizes 5 labels (pedestrian, dog, marathon runner, bicycler, scooter rider)


OR



Model D: Recognizes 20 labels (all labels above put together)


Would Model D be as accurate as Model A,B,C put together?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I would like to use a YOLO network, retrain it to recognize say, 20 labels.



    Would adding labels to a single network in training reduce its accurary?



    Would it be better to train multiple models on 5,10 and 5 labels respectively.



    e.g.



    Model A : recognizes 5 labels (ferrari,honda,ford,toyota,tesla)
    Model B : regonzies 10 labels (store front / stopsign, speed sign, super charger station , etccc. )
    Model C : recongizes 5 labels (pedestrian, dog, marathon runner, bicycler, scooter rider)


    OR



    Model D: Recognizes 20 labels (all labels above put together)


    Would Model D be as accurate as Model A,B,C put together?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I would like to use a YOLO network, retrain it to recognize say, 20 labels.



      Would adding labels to a single network in training reduce its accurary?



      Would it be better to train multiple models on 5,10 and 5 labels respectively.



      e.g.



      Model A : recognizes 5 labels (ferrari,honda,ford,toyota,tesla)
      Model B : regonzies 10 labels (store front / stopsign, speed sign, super charger station , etccc. )
      Model C : recongizes 5 labels (pedestrian, dog, marathon runner, bicycler, scooter rider)


      OR



      Model D: Recognizes 20 labels (all labels above put together)


      Would Model D be as accurate as Model A,B,C put together?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I would like to use a YOLO network, retrain it to recognize say, 20 labels.



      Would adding labels to a single network in training reduce its accurary?



      Would it be better to train multiple models on 5,10 and 5 labels respectively.



      e.g.



      Model A : recognizes 5 labels (ferrari,honda,ford,toyota,tesla)
      Model B : regonzies 10 labels (store front / stopsign, speed sign, super charger station , etccc. )
      Model C : recongizes 5 labels (pedestrian, dog, marathon runner, bicycler, scooter rider)


      OR



      Model D: Recognizes 20 labels (all labels above put together)


      Would Model D be as accurate as Model A,B,C put together?







      neural-network image-recognition yolo






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 9 hours ago









      pcko1

      1,666418




      1,666418






      New contributor




      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 13 hours ago









      Ryu S.Ryu S.

      62




      62




      New contributor




      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Ryu S. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          It depends specially on data size and model capacity.



          1. If the number of data points per category is insufficient, which is frequently the case in reality, a single model for combined categories performs better, since the effect of data shortage will be attenuated by sharing a model among different but related tasks, i.e. shared knowledge. However, we should not forget about the capacity of model, if model capacity is not enough for the combined task, this sharing would backfire as the model spreads its limited capacity across multiple tasks and becomes "jack of all trades, and master of none". Therefore, this approach is favorable if model capacity permits, which is less of a concern for neural networks with flexible size constraints.


          2. If the number of data points per category is sufficient, which is rarely the case, or model capacity is limited (for example, when model performance stops improving when trained on more than 10% of data), single model per category is better since no capacity will be wasted on different (although related) tasks. From a different point of view, although this choice might be less favorable in terms of model accuracy, but it allows parallel development on smaller tasks, i.e. faster production, which could be a justified benefit for the cost we pay in terms of model accuracy.


          We can also combine the two approaches, which could be more time-consuming than both. First we train a model on combined categories, then we feed a part (or parts) of the trained model (such as a layer, the final prediction, etc.) to a specific model that will be trained on one category. This is exactly what a pre-trained model does for us, it is trained on a more general task with more data (possibly even a different but related task), and then we use it for a specific task.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "557"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Ryu S. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48952%2fyolo-what-is-better-multiple-networks-per-label-or-multiple-labels-in-single-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            It depends specially on data size and model capacity.



            1. If the number of data points per category is insufficient, which is frequently the case in reality, a single model for combined categories performs better, since the effect of data shortage will be attenuated by sharing a model among different but related tasks, i.e. shared knowledge. However, we should not forget about the capacity of model, if model capacity is not enough for the combined task, this sharing would backfire as the model spreads its limited capacity across multiple tasks and becomes "jack of all trades, and master of none". Therefore, this approach is favorable if model capacity permits, which is less of a concern for neural networks with flexible size constraints.


            2. If the number of data points per category is sufficient, which is rarely the case, or model capacity is limited (for example, when model performance stops improving when trained on more than 10% of data), single model per category is better since no capacity will be wasted on different (although related) tasks. From a different point of view, although this choice might be less favorable in terms of model accuracy, but it allows parallel development on smaller tasks, i.e. faster production, which could be a justified benefit for the cost we pay in terms of model accuracy.


            We can also combine the two approaches, which could be more time-consuming than both. First we train a model on combined categories, then we feed a part (or parts) of the trained model (such as a layer, the final prediction, etc.) to a specific model that will be trained on one category. This is exactly what a pre-trained model does for us, it is trained on a more general task with more data (possibly even a different but related task), and then we use it for a specific task.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              It depends specially on data size and model capacity.



              1. If the number of data points per category is insufficient, which is frequently the case in reality, a single model for combined categories performs better, since the effect of data shortage will be attenuated by sharing a model among different but related tasks, i.e. shared knowledge. However, we should not forget about the capacity of model, if model capacity is not enough for the combined task, this sharing would backfire as the model spreads its limited capacity across multiple tasks and becomes "jack of all trades, and master of none". Therefore, this approach is favorable if model capacity permits, which is less of a concern for neural networks with flexible size constraints.


              2. If the number of data points per category is sufficient, which is rarely the case, or model capacity is limited (for example, when model performance stops improving when trained on more than 10% of data), single model per category is better since no capacity will be wasted on different (although related) tasks. From a different point of view, although this choice might be less favorable in terms of model accuracy, but it allows parallel development on smaller tasks, i.e. faster production, which could be a justified benefit for the cost we pay in terms of model accuracy.


              We can also combine the two approaches, which could be more time-consuming than both. First we train a model on combined categories, then we feed a part (or parts) of the trained model (such as a layer, the final prediction, etc.) to a specific model that will be trained on one category. This is exactly what a pre-trained model does for us, it is trained on a more general task with more data (possibly even a different but related task), and then we use it for a specific task.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                It depends specially on data size and model capacity.



                1. If the number of data points per category is insufficient, which is frequently the case in reality, a single model for combined categories performs better, since the effect of data shortage will be attenuated by sharing a model among different but related tasks, i.e. shared knowledge. However, we should not forget about the capacity of model, if model capacity is not enough for the combined task, this sharing would backfire as the model spreads its limited capacity across multiple tasks and becomes "jack of all trades, and master of none". Therefore, this approach is favorable if model capacity permits, which is less of a concern for neural networks with flexible size constraints.


                2. If the number of data points per category is sufficient, which is rarely the case, or model capacity is limited (for example, when model performance stops improving when trained on more than 10% of data), single model per category is better since no capacity will be wasted on different (although related) tasks. From a different point of view, although this choice might be less favorable in terms of model accuracy, but it allows parallel development on smaller tasks, i.e. faster production, which could be a justified benefit for the cost we pay in terms of model accuracy.


                We can also combine the two approaches, which could be more time-consuming than both. First we train a model on combined categories, then we feed a part (or parts) of the trained model (such as a layer, the final prediction, etc.) to a specific model that will be trained on one category. This is exactly what a pre-trained model does for us, it is trained on a more general task with more data (possibly even a different but related task), and then we use it for a specific task.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                It depends specially on data size and model capacity.



                1. If the number of data points per category is insufficient, which is frequently the case in reality, a single model for combined categories performs better, since the effect of data shortage will be attenuated by sharing a model among different but related tasks, i.e. shared knowledge. However, we should not forget about the capacity of model, if model capacity is not enough for the combined task, this sharing would backfire as the model spreads its limited capacity across multiple tasks and becomes "jack of all trades, and master of none". Therefore, this approach is favorable if model capacity permits, which is less of a concern for neural networks with flexible size constraints.


                2. If the number of data points per category is sufficient, which is rarely the case, or model capacity is limited (for example, when model performance stops improving when trained on more than 10% of data), single model per category is better since no capacity will be wasted on different (although related) tasks. From a different point of view, although this choice might be less favorable in terms of model accuracy, but it allows parallel development on smaller tasks, i.e. faster production, which could be a justified benefit for the cost we pay in terms of model accuracy.


                We can also combine the two approaches, which could be more time-consuming than both. First we train a model on combined categories, then we feed a part (or parts) of the trained model (such as a layer, the final prediction, etc.) to a specific model that will be trained on one category. This is exactly what a pre-trained model does for us, it is trained on a more general task with more data (possibly even a different but related task), and then we use it for a specific task.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 10 hours ago









                EsmailianEsmailian

                2,921319




                2,921319




















                    Ryu S. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Ryu S. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Ryu S. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Ryu S. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48952%2fyolo-what-is-better-multiple-networks-per-label-or-multiple-labels-in-single-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

                    Partai Komunis Tiongkok Daftar isi Kepemimpinan | Pranala luar | Referensi | Menu navigasidiperiksa1 perubahan tertundacpc.people.com.cnSitus resmiSurat kabar resmi"Why the Communist Party is alive, well and flourishing in China"0307-1235"Full text of Constitution of Communist Party of China"smengembangkannyas

                    ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result