Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

When I export an AI 300x60 art board it saves with bigger dimensions

What does こした mean?

What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?

How would it unbalance gameplay to rule that Weapon Master allows for picking a fighting style?

What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?

"Working on a knee"

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?

Does a Draconic Bloodline sorcerer's doubled proficiency bonus for Charisma checks against dragons apply to all dragon types or only the chosen one?

What does the black goddess statue do and what is it?

Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?

How did Elite on the NES work?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

Is a self contained air-bullet cartridge feasible?

Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?

Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?



Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
























  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    1 hour ago

















7















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
























  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    1 hour ago













7












7








7


6






I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?






c++ constructor friend-class






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







Syfu_H

















asked 2 hours ago









Syfu_HSyfu_H

35518




35518












  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    1 hour ago

















  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    1 hour ago
















Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago





Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8














Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



class Employee 
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

    – wally
    1 hour ago












  • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

    – wally
    1 hour ago



















2














You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



class Employee 
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;

int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile







share|improve this answer






























    2














    You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



    eg:



    class Employee 
    public:
    Employee() : sal()
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;





    share|improve this answer
































      1














      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        I recommend explaining why.

        – user4581301
        2 hours ago











      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

        – Syfu_H
        2 hours ago






      • 1





        @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

        – user4581301
        2 hours ago











      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8














      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        1 hour ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        1 hour ago
















      8














      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        1 hour ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        1 hour ago














      8












      8








      8







      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer















      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 2 hours ago









      zdanzdan

      22.2k34864




      22.2k34864







      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        1 hour ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        1 hour ago













      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        1 hour ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        1 hour ago








      1




      1





      I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

      – wally
      1 hour ago






      I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

      – wally
      1 hour ago














      GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

      – wally
      1 hour ago






      GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

      – wally
      1 hour ago














      2














      You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() // add it
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;

      int main()
      Employee emp; // now this should compile







      share|improve this answer



























        2














        You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



        class Employee 
        public:
        Employee() // add it
        std::string name_;
        Salary sal;
        ;

        int main()
        Employee emp; // now this should compile







        share|improve this answer

























          2












          2








          2







          You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



          class Employee 
          public:
          Employee() // add it
          std::string name_;
          Salary sal;
          ;

          int main()
          Employee emp; // now this should compile







          share|improve this answer













          You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



          class Employee 
          public:
          Employee() // add it
          std::string name_;
          Salary sal;
          ;

          int main()
          Employee emp; // now this should compile








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Raindrop7Raindrop7

          3,74531224




          3,74531224





















              2














              You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



              eg:



              class Employee 
              public:
              Employee() : sal()
              public:
              std::string name_;
              Salary sal;
              ;





              share|improve this answer





























                2














                You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                eg:



                class Employee 
                public:
                Employee() : sal()
                public:
                std::string name_;
                Salary sal;
                ;





                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                  eg:



                  class Employee 
                  public:
                  Employee() : sal()
                  public:
                  std::string name_;
                  Salary sal;
                  ;





                  share|improve this answer















                  You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                  eg:



                  class Employee 
                  public:
                  Employee() : sal()
                  public:
                  std::string name_;
                  Salary sal;
                  ;






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 1 hour ago









                  Pavan Manjunath

                  20.1k1181108




                  20.1k1181108










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  schuessschuess

                  536416




                  536416





















                      1














                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago















                      1














                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago













                      1












                      1








                      1







                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer













                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      Eric SokolowskyEric Sokolowsky

                      614




                      614







                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago












                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        2 hours ago







                      1




                      1





                      I recommend explaining why.

                      – user4581301
                      2 hours ago





                      I recommend explaining why.

                      – user4581301
                      2 hours ago













                      Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                      – Syfu_H
                      2 hours ago





                      Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                      – Syfu_H
                      2 hours ago




                      1




                      1





                      @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                      – user4581301
                      2 hours ago





                      @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                      – user4581301
                      2 hours ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

                      Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

                      Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery