How to compute a Jacobian using polar coordinates?How do I convert a vector field in Cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates?gradient in polar coordinate by changing gradient in Cartesian coordinateJacobian of the change of variablesJacobian Determinant of Polar-Coordinate TransformationPolar coordinates and Jacobian of $frac12 r $Elementary JacobianPartial derivative in polar coordinatesHow do I prove this identity involving polar coordinates and $nabla$?What is the Jacobian in this transformationDoubt about differentia operatorl in polar coordinates
How to begin with a paragraph in latex
When does Bran Stark remember Jamie pushing him?
Is a self contained air-bullet cartridge feasible?
Why would the Overseers waste their stock of slaves on the Game?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
"Working on a knee"
Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?
Israeli soda type drink
Why is arima in R one time step off?
Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?
Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?
What is /etc/mtab in Linux?
Is it appropriate to mention a relatable company blog post when you're asked about the company?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?
What to do with someone that cheated their way though university and a PhD program?
What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?
Bright yellow or light yellow?
What is a 'Key' in computer science?
RIP Packet Format
Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?
In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
Is there a possibility to generate a list dynamically in Latex?
How to compute a Jacobian using polar coordinates?
How do I convert a vector field in Cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates?gradient in polar coordinate by changing gradient in Cartesian coordinateJacobian of the change of variablesJacobian Determinant of Polar-Coordinate TransformationPolar coordinates and Jacobian of $frac12 r $Elementary JacobianPartial derivative in polar coordinatesHow do I prove this identity involving polar coordinates and $nabla$?What is the Jacobian in this transformationDoubt about differentia operatorl in polar coordinates
$begingroup$
Consider the transformation $F$ of $mathbb R^2setminus(0,0)$ onto itself defined as
$$
F(x, y):=left( fracxx^2+y^2, fracyx^2+y^2right).$$
Its Jacobian matrix is
$$tag1
beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrix,quad textand its determinant equals frac-1(x^2+y^2)^2.$$
The following alternative computation is wrong at (!) and (!!), and I cannot see why.
Let $phicolon (0, infty)times (-pi, pi)to mathbb R^2$ be the map $$phi(r, theta) =(rcos theta, rsin theta).$$ Let moreover $$tag2tildeF:=phi^-1circ Fcirc phi;$$ then, by an easy direct computation, $$tildeF(r, theta)=left( frac1r, thetaright).$$The Jacobian matrix of $tildeF$ is, thus, $$tag!beginbmatrix frac-1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix , quad textand its determinant equals frac-1r^2.$$On the other hand, by (2) and by the chain rule, the Jacobian determinants of $F$ and $tildeF$ are equal. We conclude that the Jacobian determinant of $F$ is $$tag!! frac-1r^2=frac-1x^2+y^2.$$
The result (!!) is off by a factor of $r^-2$ from the correct one, which is given in (1). Equation (!) must also be wrong. Indeed, computing the Jacobian matrix from (2) using the chain rule I obtain the result
$$
beginbmatrix fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 & fracysqrtx^2+y^2 \ -fracyx^2+y^2 & fracxx^2+y^2endbmatrix beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrixbeginbmatrix costheta & -rsintheta \ sin theta & rcos thetaendbmatrix = beginbmatrix -frac1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & frac1r^2endbmatrix,$$
which is different from the matrix in (!), and which gives the correct determinant of $-1/r^4$, as it should be.
Can you help me spot the mistake?
calculus multivariable-calculus differential-geometry
$endgroup$
|
$begingroup$
Consider the transformation $F$ of $mathbb R^2setminus(0,0)$ onto itself defined as
$$
F(x, y):=left( fracxx^2+y^2, fracyx^2+y^2right).$$
Its Jacobian matrix is
$$tag1
beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrix,quad textand its determinant equals frac-1(x^2+y^2)^2.$$
The following alternative computation is wrong at (!) and (!!), and I cannot see why.
Let $phicolon (0, infty)times (-pi, pi)to mathbb R^2$ be the map $$phi(r, theta) =(rcos theta, rsin theta).$$ Let moreover $$tag2tildeF:=phi^-1circ Fcirc phi;$$ then, by an easy direct computation, $$tildeF(r, theta)=left( frac1r, thetaright).$$The Jacobian matrix of $tildeF$ is, thus, $$tag!beginbmatrix frac-1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix , quad textand its determinant equals frac-1r^2.$$On the other hand, by (2) and by the chain rule, the Jacobian determinants of $F$ and $tildeF$ are equal. We conclude that the Jacobian determinant of $F$ is $$tag!! frac-1r^2=frac-1x^2+y^2.$$
The result (!!) is off by a factor of $r^-2$ from the correct one, which is given in (1). Equation (!) must also be wrong. Indeed, computing the Jacobian matrix from (2) using the chain rule I obtain the result
$$
beginbmatrix fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 & fracysqrtx^2+y^2 \ -fracyx^2+y^2 & fracxx^2+y^2endbmatrix beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrixbeginbmatrix costheta & -rsintheta \ sin theta & rcos thetaendbmatrix = beginbmatrix -frac1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & frac1r^2endbmatrix,$$
which is different from the matrix in (!), and which gives the correct determinant of $-1/r^4$, as it should be.
Can you help me spot the mistake?
calculus multivariable-calculus differential-geometry
$endgroup$
|
$begingroup$
Consider the transformation $F$ of $mathbb R^2setminus(0,0)$ onto itself defined as
$$
F(x, y):=left( fracxx^2+y^2, fracyx^2+y^2right).$$
Its Jacobian matrix is
$$tag1
beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrix,quad textand its determinant equals frac-1(x^2+y^2)^2.$$
The following alternative computation is wrong at (!) and (!!), and I cannot see why.
Let $phicolon (0, infty)times (-pi, pi)to mathbb R^2$ be the map $$phi(r, theta) =(rcos theta, rsin theta).$$ Let moreover $$tag2tildeF:=phi^-1circ Fcirc phi;$$ then, by an easy direct computation, $$tildeF(r, theta)=left( frac1r, thetaright).$$The Jacobian matrix of $tildeF$ is, thus, $$tag!beginbmatrix frac-1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix , quad textand its determinant equals frac-1r^2.$$On the other hand, by (2) and by the chain rule, the Jacobian determinants of $F$ and $tildeF$ are equal. We conclude that the Jacobian determinant of $F$ is $$tag!! frac-1r^2=frac-1x^2+y^2.$$
The result (!!) is off by a factor of $r^-2$ from the correct one, which is given in (1). Equation (!) must also be wrong. Indeed, computing the Jacobian matrix from (2) using the chain rule I obtain the result
$$
beginbmatrix fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 & fracysqrtx^2+y^2 \ -fracyx^2+y^2 & fracxx^2+y^2endbmatrix beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrixbeginbmatrix costheta & -rsintheta \ sin theta & rcos thetaendbmatrix = beginbmatrix -frac1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & frac1r^2endbmatrix,$$
which is different from the matrix in (!), and which gives the correct determinant of $-1/r^4$, as it should be.
Can you help me spot the mistake?
calculus multivariable-calculus differential-geometry
$endgroup$
Consider the transformation $F$ of $mathbb R^2setminus(0,0)$ onto itself defined as
$$
F(x, y):=left( fracxx^2+y^2, fracyx^2+y^2right).$$
Its Jacobian matrix is
$$tag1
beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrix,quad textand its determinant equals frac-1(x^2+y^2)^2.$$
The following alternative computation is wrong at (!) and (!!), and I cannot see why.
Let $phicolon (0, infty)times (-pi, pi)to mathbb R^2$ be the map $$phi(r, theta) =(rcos theta, rsin theta).$$ Let moreover $$tag2tildeF:=phi^-1circ Fcirc phi;$$ then, by an easy direct computation, $$tildeF(r, theta)=left( frac1r, thetaright).$$The Jacobian matrix of $tildeF$ is, thus, $$tag!beginbmatrix frac-1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix , quad textand its determinant equals frac-1r^2.$$On the other hand, by (2) and by the chain rule, the Jacobian determinants of $F$ and $tildeF$ are equal. We conclude that the Jacobian determinant of $F$ is $$tag!! frac-1r^2=frac-1x^2+y^2.$$
The result (!!) is off by a factor of $r^-2$ from the correct one, which is given in (1). Equation (!) must also be wrong. Indeed, computing the Jacobian matrix from (2) using the chain rule I obtain the result
$$
beginbmatrix fracxsqrtx^2+y^2 & fracysqrtx^2+y^2 \ -fracyx^2+y^2 & fracxx^2+y^2endbmatrix beginbmatrix fracy^2-x^2(x^2+y^2)^2 & -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 \ -frac2xy(x^2+y^2)^2 & fracx^2-y^2(x^2+y^2)^2 endbmatrixbeginbmatrix costheta & -rsintheta \ sin theta & rcos thetaendbmatrix = beginbmatrix -frac1r^2 & 0 \ 0 & frac1r^2endbmatrix,$$
which is different from the matrix in (!), and which gives the correct determinant of $-1/r^4$, as it should be.
Can you help me spot the mistake?
calculus multivariable-calculus differential-geometry
calculus multivariable-calculus differential-geometry
edited 3 hours ago
Tengu
2,68411021
2,68411021
asked 4 hours ago
Giuseppe NegroGiuseppe Negro
17.7k332128
17.7k332128
|
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Jacobians of the two functions aren't equal by the chain rule.
In actual fact, $D(phi(frac1r, costheta)) × DtildeF(r, theta)= DF times D(phi(r, theta))$
$endgroup$
|
$begingroup$
I don't think there is any contradiction here.
Consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Cart = dx wedge dy.$$
Your first calculation shows that the pullback $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$ is given by
$$ F^star(omega_rm Cart) = - frac1(x^2+y^2)^2omega_rm Cart.$$
Now consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Polar = dr wedge dtheta.$$
Your second calculation shows that
$$ F^star(omega_rm Polar)=-frac 1 r^2 omega_rm Polar. $$
We can use this to recompute $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$. In view of the fact that
$$ omega_rm Cart = r omega_rm Polar,$$
we have:
beginalign
F^star(omega_rm Cart) &= F^star(romega_rm Polar) \ &= F^star(r) F^star(omega_rm Polar) \ &= frac 1 r left( - frac 1 r^2omega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac1r^4 left(romega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac 1 r^4 omega_rm Cart
endalign
which is consistent with the first calculation!
As for the application of the chain rule, we have:
$$ (Dbar F)|_(r, theta) = D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) (DF)|_phi(r, theta) (Dphi)|_(r, theta)$$
The key point is that you must evaluate $D(phi^-1)$ at the point $left(frac x (x^2 +y^2), frac y (x^2 + y^2)right)$, not at the point $(x, y)$.
This is equal to
$$ D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) = beginbmatrix fracfracxx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracyx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 \ -fracfracyx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracxx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2endbmatrix = beginbmatrixcostheta & sin theta \ - rsin theta & rcostheta endbmatrix$$
which is not the inverse of $(Dphi)|_(r, theta)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Jacobians of the two functions aren't equal by the chain rule.
In actual fact, $D(phi(frac1r, costheta)) × DtildeF(r, theta)= DF times D(phi(r, theta))$
$endgroup$
|
$begingroup$
The Jacobians of the two functions aren't equal by the chain rule.
In actual fact, $D(phi(frac1r, costheta)) × DtildeF(r, theta)= DF times D(phi(r, theta))$
$endgroup$
|
$begingroup$
The Jacobians of the two functions aren't equal by the chain rule.
In actual fact, $D(phi(frac1r, costheta)) × DtildeF(r, theta)= DF times D(phi(r, theta))$
$endgroup$
The Jacobians of the two functions aren't equal by the chain rule.
In actual fact, $D(phi(frac1r, costheta)) × DtildeF(r, theta)= DF times D(phi(r, theta))$
answered 3 hours ago
George DewhirstGeorge Dewhirst
1,72515
1,72515
|
|
$begingroup$
I don't think there is any contradiction here.
Consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Cart = dx wedge dy.$$
Your first calculation shows that the pullback $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$ is given by
$$ F^star(omega_rm Cart) = - frac1(x^2+y^2)^2omega_rm Cart.$$
Now consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Polar = dr wedge dtheta.$$
Your second calculation shows that
$$ F^star(omega_rm Polar)=-frac 1 r^2 omega_rm Polar. $$
We can use this to recompute $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$. In view of the fact that
$$ omega_rm Cart = r omega_rm Polar,$$
we have:
beginalign
F^star(omega_rm Cart) &= F^star(romega_rm Polar) \ &= F^star(r) F^star(omega_rm Polar) \ &= frac 1 r left( - frac 1 r^2omega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac1r^4 left(romega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac 1 r^4 omega_rm Cart
endalign
which is consistent with the first calculation!
As for the application of the chain rule, we have:
$$ (Dbar F)|_(r, theta) = D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) (DF)|_phi(r, theta) (Dphi)|_(r, theta)$$
The key point is that you must evaluate $D(phi^-1)$ at the point $left(frac x (x^2 +y^2), frac y (x^2 + y^2)right)$, not at the point $(x, y)$.
This is equal to
$$ D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) = beginbmatrix fracfracxx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracyx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 \ -fracfracyx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracxx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2endbmatrix = beginbmatrixcostheta & sin theta \ - rsin theta & rcostheta endbmatrix$$
which is not the inverse of $(Dphi)|_(r, theta)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
|
$begingroup$
I don't think there is any contradiction here.
Consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Cart = dx wedge dy.$$
Your first calculation shows that the pullback $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$ is given by
$$ F^star(omega_rm Cart) = - frac1(x^2+y^2)^2omega_rm Cart.$$
Now consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Polar = dr wedge dtheta.$$
Your second calculation shows that
$$ F^star(omega_rm Polar)=-frac 1 r^2 omega_rm Polar. $$
We can use this to recompute $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$. In view of the fact that
$$ omega_rm Cart = r omega_rm Polar,$$
we have:
beginalign
F^star(omega_rm Cart) &= F^star(romega_rm Polar) \ &= F^star(r) F^star(omega_rm Polar) \ &= frac 1 r left( - frac 1 r^2omega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac1r^4 left(romega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac 1 r^4 omega_rm Cart
endalign
which is consistent with the first calculation!
As for the application of the chain rule, we have:
$$ (Dbar F)|_(r, theta) = D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) (DF)|_phi(r, theta) (Dphi)|_(r, theta)$$
The key point is that you must evaluate $D(phi^-1)$ at the point $left(frac x (x^2 +y^2), frac y (x^2 + y^2)right)$, not at the point $(x, y)$.
This is equal to
$$ D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) = beginbmatrix fracfracxx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracyx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 \ -fracfracyx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracxx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2endbmatrix = beginbmatrixcostheta & sin theta \ - rsin theta & rcostheta endbmatrix$$
which is not the inverse of $(Dphi)|_(r, theta)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
|
$begingroup$
I don't think there is any contradiction here.
Consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Cart = dx wedge dy.$$
Your first calculation shows that the pullback $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$ is given by
$$ F^star(omega_rm Cart) = - frac1(x^2+y^2)^2omega_rm Cart.$$
Now consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Polar = dr wedge dtheta.$$
Your second calculation shows that
$$ F^star(omega_rm Polar)=-frac 1 r^2 omega_rm Polar. $$
We can use this to recompute $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$. In view of the fact that
$$ omega_rm Cart = r omega_rm Polar,$$
we have:
beginalign
F^star(omega_rm Cart) &= F^star(romega_rm Polar) \ &= F^star(r) F^star(omega_rm Polar) \ &= frac 1 r left( - frac 1 r^2omega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac1r^4 left(romega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac 1 r^4 omega_rm Cart
endalign
which is consistent with the first calculation!
As for the application of the chain rule, we have:
$$ (Dbar F)|_(r, theta) = D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) (DF)|_phi(r, theta) (Dphi)|_(r, theta)$$
The key point is that you must evaluate $D(phi^-1)$ at the point $left(frac x (x^2 +y^2), frac y (x^2 + y^2)right)$, not at the point $(x, y)$.
This is equal to
$$ D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) = beginbmatrix fracfracxx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracyx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 \ -fracfracyx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracxx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2endbmatrix = beginbmatrixcostheta & sin theta \ - rsin theta & rcostheta endbmatrix$$
which is not the inverse of $(Dphi)|_(r, theta)$.
$endgroup$
I don't think there is any contradiction here.
Consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Cart = dx wedge dy.$$
Your first calculation shows that the pullback $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$ is given by
$$ F^star(omega_rm Cart) = - frac1(x^2+y^2)^2omega_rm Cart.$$
Now consider the volume form
$$ omega_rm Polar = dr wedge dtheta.$$
Your second calculation shows that
$$ F^star(omega_rm Polar)=-frac 1 r^2 omega_rm Polar. $$
We can use this to recompute $F^star(omega_rm Cart)$. In view of the fact that
$$ omega_rm Cart = r omega_rm Polar,$$
we have:
beginalign
F^star(omega_rm Cart) &= F^star(romega_rm Polar) \ &= F^star(r) F^star(omega_rm Polar) \ &= frac 1 r left( - frac 1 r^2omega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac1r^4 left(romega_rm Polar right) \ &= - frac 1 r^4 omega_rm Cart
endalign
which is consistent with the first calculation!
As for the application of the chain rule, we have:
$$ (Dbar F)|_(r, theta) = D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) (DF)|_phi(r, theta) (Dphi)|_(r, theta)$$
The key point is that you must evaluate $D(phi^-1)$ at the point $left(frac x (x^2 +y^2), frac y (x^2 + y^2)right)$, not at the point $(x, y)$.
This is equal to
$$ D(phi^-1)|_Fcirc phi(r, theta) = beginbmatrix fracfracxx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracyx^2 + y^2sqrtleft(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 \ -fracfracyx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2 & fracfracxx^2 + y^2left(fracxx^2 + y^2 right)^2+left( fracyx^2 + y^2right)^2endbmatrix = beginbmatrixcostheta & sin theta \ - rsin theta & rcostheta endbmatrix$$
which is not the inverse of $(Dphi)|_(r, theta)$.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Kenny WongKenny Wong
20.1k21442
20.1k21442
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
|
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I couldn't expect a better answer. You nailed it completely. Also, thank you for suggesting the viewpoint of volume forms; that makes for much slicker computations.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
2 hours ago
|