How can a team of shapeshifters communicate? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?How to contain a shapeshifterShapeshifters - Shared language between human and animal formsWhat happens when a shapeshifter gets muddy?A heavy shapeshifter in small body - where to store mass?What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?How to differentiate between different races of shape shifters?How would shapeshifters be affected by their abilities?War between human/animal shapeshifters and humansHow would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?How would tattoos for shapeshifters work?

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Test print coming out spongy

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

"klopfte jemand" or "jemand klopfte"?

Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Is it dangerous to install hacking tools on my private linux machine?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

Can two person see the same photon?

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose-gear up landing?

Universal covering space of the real projective line?

RSA find public exponent

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Why does electrolysis of aqueous concentrated sodium bromide produce bromine at the anode?

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Can you force honesty by using the Speak with Dead and Zone of Truth spells together?

What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

One-one communication

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?



How can a team of shapeshifters communicate?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?How to contain a shapeshifterShapeshifters - Shared language between human and animal formsWhat happens when a shapeshifter gets muddy?A heavy shapeshifter in small body - where to store mass?What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?How to differentiate between different races of shape shifters?How would shapeshifters be affected by their abilities?War between human/animal shapeshifters and humansHow would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?How would tattoos for shapeshifters work?










3












$begingroup$


There is a group of people who can shapeshift. They send out hunting parties, scout teams, etc. In a circumstance where a group of ten people can look like ten different species (one human, one wolf, one demon antelope, etc.) is there any way they can communicate effectively across team members without having to change shape back to a species with greater vocalization ranges? Telepathy is excluded as an option.



The best answer would be that which allows for the most complex information to be shared in the most quick and efficient manner. For example, "scent glands" could feasibly be integrated into just about any form a person takes, and used to emit smells for communication, but one weakness as an answer is that it seems difficult if not impossible to convey more detailed information using this method. My benchmark for a useful method would be the feasibility of saying something basic, but with details, like: "two people, north, armed with spears, riding horses."



I should probably also clarify we are talking all generally "person-sized" animals here, not a three-inch-long mouse trying to communicate with a two-story-high dragon. The shapeshifters are limited in the extent that they can re-proportion their mass, and can only turn into physically possible animal species.



Edit: Some clarifications that came up in the comments.



For the purpose of this question, let's use humans as the baseline for the shapeshifters in their natural form, with all the assumptions inherent to them (possessing a developed verbal language, high intelligence, etc.) Any differences that suggest themselves as significant I will try to state and clarify as necessary.



The shapeshifters have some degree of adaptability, but have to start with an existing animal as a blueprint. basically they can't do anything not biologically practical. AKA you can start with a giant cat beast, then proceed to make the fur longer or change its color, change your build a bit, etc., but if it wouldn't be functional on the actual animal, it isn't going to work for you either, and may be prevented due to inbuilt shapeshifting failsafes. You probably can't add unbalanced tentacles to your giant cat, but you can likely make your tail longer.



There is an extent to which the shapeshifter's own inherent internal structure is required to be retained as well. For instance, the biological components (such as a shapeshifting-devoted internal organ, their brain, and their blood) related to the shape-shifting process can't be altered or eliminated. Nor can the shapeshifter's cells turn into anything not a natural organic part of their body. So, they can create hair (or fur), bone, skin, muscle, claws (or horns or tusks or scales) etc. etc. But they cannot turn a part of their body into metal, being non organic, or bark, since, despite being organic, it isn't made from the same sort of materials their natural body is (I think?). So while you might be able to shapeshift a bone exoskeleton or scales as natural armor when fighting, you couldn't turn your arm into a steel sword or your skin to iron.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is their shapeshifting "all or nothing"?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are they constrained to existing species, or can do partial/mixed forms? Submitted to your consideration: Isaac Arthur on Alien senses - in particular consider electroreception and magnetoreception. See also Octopus 101 | Communication!.
    $endgroup$
    – Theraot
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might be interested in my question What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn thanks for the link. limited to wolves only, compared to what I'm looking for, but still an interesting and informative topic
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please edit your question with clarifications. Never assume people will read through the comments before answering. Along with your clarification to @L.Dutch's question, please explain how these creatures communicate when in their native form and whether or not telepathy is permissible for an answer. Finally, note that "something basic" isn't basic at all. Useful communication requires a fair number of verbs and nouns (e.g., "spear"). How intelligent is this species?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$


There is a group of people who can shapeshift. They send out hunting parties, scout teams, etc. In a circumstance where a group of ten people can look like ten different species (one human, one wolf, one demon antelope, etc.) is there any way they can communicate effectively across team members without having to change shape back to a species with greater vocalization ranges? Telepathy is excluded as an option.



The best answer would be that which allows for the most complex information to be shared in the most quick and efficient manner. For example, "scent glands" could feasibly be integrated into just about any form a person takes, and used to emit smells for communication, but one weakness as an answer is that it seems difficult if not impossible to convey more detailed information using this method. My benchmark for a useful method would be the feasibility of saying something basic, but with details, like: "two people, north, armed with spears, riding horses."



I should probably also clarify we are talking all generally "person-sized" animals here, not a three-inch-long mouse trying to communicate with a two-story-high dragon. The shapeshifters are limited in the extent that they can re-proportion their mass, and can only turn into physically possible animal species.



Edit: Some clarifications that came up in the comments.



For the purpose of this question, let's use humans as the baseline for the shapeshifters in their natural form, with all the assumptions inherent to them (possessing a developed verbal language, high intelligence, etc.) Any differences that suggest themselves as significant I will try to state and clarify as necessary.



The shapeshifters have some degree of adaptability, but have to start with an existing animal as a blueprint. basically they can't do anything not biologically practical. AKA you can start with a giant cat beast, then proceed to make the fur longer or change its color, change your build a bit, etc., but if it wouldn't be functional on the actual animal, it isn't going to work for you either, and may be prevented due to inbuilt shapeshifting failsafes. You probably can't add unbalanced tentacles to your giant cat, but you can likely make your tail longer.



There is an extent to which the shapeshifter's own inherent internal structure is required to be retained as well. For instance, the biological components (such as a shapeshifting-devoted internal organ, their brain, and their blood) related to the shape-shifting process can't be altered or eliminated. Nor can the shapeshifter's cells turn into anything not a natural organic part of their body. So, they can create hair (or fur), bone, skin, muscle, claws (or horns or tusks or scales) etc. etc. But they cannot turn a part of their body into metal, being non organic, or bark, since, despite being organic, it isn't made from the same sort of materials their natural body is (I think?). So while you might be able to shapeshift a bone exoskeleton or scales as natural armor when fighting, you couldn't turn your arm into a steel sword or your skin to iron.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is their shapeshifting "all or nothing"?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are they constrained to existing species, or can do partial/mixed forms? Submitted to your consideration: Isaac Arthur on Alien senses - in particular consider electroreception and magnetoreception. See also Octopus 101 | Communication!.
    $endgroup$
    – Theraot
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might be interested in my question What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn thanks for the link. limited to wolves only, compared to what I'm looking for, but still an interesting and informative topic
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please edit your question with clarifications. Never assume people will read through the comments before answering. Along with your clarification to @L.Dutch's question, please explain how these creatures communicate when in their native form and whether or not telepathy is permissible for an answer. Finally, note that "something basic" isn't basic at all. Useful communication requires a fair number of verbs and nouns (e.g., "spear"). How intelligent is this species?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


There is a group of people who can shapeshift. They send out hunting parties, scout teams, etc. In a circumstance where a group of ten people can look like ten different species (one human, one wolf, one demon antelope, etc.) is there any way they can communicate effectively across team members without having to change shape back to a species with greater vocalization ranges? Telepathy is excluded as an option.



The best answer would be that which allows for the most complex information to be shared in the most quick and efficient manner. For example, "scent glands" could feasibly be integrated into just about any form a person takes, and used to emit smells for communication, but one weakness as an answer is that it seems difficult if not impossible to convey more detailed information using this method. My benchmark for a useful method would be the feasibility of saying something basic, but with details, like: "two people, north, armed with spears, riding horses."



I should probably also clarify we are talking all generally "person-sized" animals here, not a three-inch-long mouse trying to communicate with a two-story-high dragon. The shapeshifters are limited in the extent that they can re-proportion their mass, and can only turn into physically possible animal species.



Edit: Some clarifications that came up in the comments.



For the purpose of this question, let's use humans as the baseline for the shapeshifters in their natural form, with all the assumptions inherent to them (possessing a developed verbal language, high intelligence, etc.) Any differences that suggest themselves as significant I will try to state and clarify as necessary.



The shapeshifters have some degree of adaptability, but have to start with an existing animal as a blueprint. basically they can't do anything not biologically practical. AKA you can start with a giant cat beast, then proceed to make the fur longer or change its color, change your build a bit, etc., but if it wouldn't be functional on the actual animal, it isn't going to work for you either, and may be prevented due to inbuilt shapeshifting failsafes. You probably can't add unbalanced tentacles to your giant cat, but you can likely make your tail longer.



There is an extent to which the shapeshifter's own inherent internal structure is required to be retained as well. For instance, the biological components (such as a shapeshifting-devoted internal organ, their brain, and their blood) related to the shape-shifting process can't be altered or eliminated. Nor can the shapeshifter's cells turn into anything not a natural organic part of their body. So, they can create hair (or fur), bone, skin, muscle, claws (or horns or tusks or scales) etc. etc. But they cannot turn a part of their body into metal, being non organic, or bark, since, despite being organic, it isn't made from the same sort of materials their natural body is (I think?). So while you might be able to shapeshift a bone exoskeleton or scales as natural armor when fighting, you couldn't turn your arm into a steel sword or your skin to iron.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




There is a group of people who can shapeshift. They send out hunting parties, scout teams, etc. In a circumstance where a group of ten people can look like ten different species (one human, one wolf, one demon antelope, etc.) is there any way they can communicate effectively across team members without having to change shape back to a species with greater vocalization ranges? Telepathy is excluded as an option.



The best answer would be that which allows for the most complex information to be shared in the most quick and efficient manner. For example, "scent glands" could feasibly be integrated into just about any form a person takes, and used to emit smells for communication, but one weakness as an answer is that it seems difficult if not impossible to convey more detailed information using this method. My benchmark for a useful method would be the feasibility of saying something basic, but with details, like: "two people, north, armed with spears, riding horses."



I should probably also clarify we are talking all generally "person-sized" animals here, not a three-inch-long mouse trying to communicate with a two-story-high dragon. The shapeshifters are limited in the extent that they can re-proportion their mass, and can only turn into physically possible animal species.



Edit: Some clarifications that came up in the comments.



For the purpose of this question, let's use humans as the baseline for the shapeshifters in their natural form, with all the assumptions inherent to them (possessing a developed verbal language, high intelligence, etc.) Any differences that suggest themselves as significant I will try to state and clarify as necessary.



The shapeshifters have some degree of adaptability, but have to start with an existing animal as a blueprint. basically they can't do anything not biologically practical. AKA you can start with a giant cat beast, then proceed to make the fur longer or change its color, change your build a bit, etc., but if it wouldn't be functional on the actual animal, it isn't going to work for you either, and may be prevented due to inbuilt shapeshifting failsafes. You probably can't add unbalanced tentacles to your giant cat, but you can likely make your tail longer.



There is an extent to which the shapeshifter's own inherent internal structure is required to be retained as well. For instance, the biological components (such as a shapeshifting-devoted internal organ, their brain, and their blood) related to the shape-shifting process can't be altered or eliminated. Nor can the shapeshifter's cells turn into anything not a natural organic part of their body. So, they can create hair (or fur), bone, skin, muscle, claws (or horns or tusks or scales) etc. etc. But they cannot turn a part of their body into metal, being non organic, or bark, since, despite being organic, it isn't made from the same sort of materials their natural body is (I think?). So while you might be able to shapeshift a bone exoskeleton or scales as natural armor when fighting, you couldn't turn your arm into a steel sword or your skin to iron.







creature-design communication shapeshifters






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 42 mins ago







MarielS

















asked 4 hours ago









MarielSMarielS

836112




836112











  • $begingroup$
    Is their shapeshifting "all or nothing"?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are they constrained to existing species, or can do partial/mixed forms? Submitted to your consideration: Isaac Arthur on Alien senses - in particular consider electroreception and magnetoreception. See also Octopus 101 | Communication!.
    $endgroup$
    – Theraot
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might be interested in my question What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn thanks for the link. limited to wolves only, compared to what I'm looking for, but still an interesting and informative topic
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please edit your question with clarifications. Never assume people will read through the comments before answering. Along with your clarification to @L.Dutch's question, please explain how these creatures communicate when in their native form and whether or not telepathy is permissible for an answer. Finally, note that "something basic" isn't basic at all. Useful communication requires a fair number of verbs and nouns (e.g., "spear"). How intelligent is this species?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Is their shapeshifting "all or nothing"?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are they constrained to existing species, or can do partial/mixed forms? Submitted to your consideration: Isaac Arthur on Alien senses - in particular consider electroreception and magnetoreception. See also Octopus 101 | Communication!.
    $endgroup$
    – Theraot
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You might be interested in my question What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @aCVn thanks for the link. limited to wolves only, compared to what I'm looking for, but still an interesting and informative topic
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please edit your question with clarifications. Never assume people will read through the comments before answering. Along with your clarification to @L.Dutch's question, please explain how these creatures communicate when in their native form and whether or not telepathy is permissible for an answer. Finally, note that "something basic" isn't basic at all. Useful communication requires a fair number of verbs and nouns (e.g., "spear"). How intelligent is this species?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Is their shapeshifting "all or nothing"?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Is their shapeshifting "all or nothing"?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Are they constrained to existing species, or can do partial/mixed forms? Submitted to your consideration: Isaac Arthur on Alien senses - in particular consider electroreception and magnetoreception. See also Octopus 101 | Communication!.
$endgroup$
– Theraot
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Are they constrained to existing species, or can do partial/mixed forms? Submitted to your consideration: Isaac Arthur on Alien senses - in particular consider electroreception and magnetoreception. See also Octopus 101 | Communication!.
$endgroup$
– Theraot
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
You might be interested in my question What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?
$endgroup$
– a CVn
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
You might be interested in my question What sounds would be common for both forms for a human/wolf shapeshifter?
$endgroup$
– a CVn
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@aCVn thanks for the link. limited to wolves only, compared to what I'm looking for, but still an interesting and informative topic
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@aCVn thanks for the link. limited to wolves only, compared to what I'm looking for, but still an interesting and informative topic
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Please edit your question with clarifications. Never assume people will read through the comments before answering. Along with your clarification to @L.Dutch's question, please explain how these creatures communicate when in their native form and whether or not telepathy is permissible for an answer. Finally, note that "something basic" isn't basic at all. Useful communication requires a fair number of verbs and nouns (e.g., "spear"). How intelligent is this species?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Please edit your question with clarifications. Never assume people will read through the comments before answering. Along with your clarification to @L.Dutch's question, please explain how these creatures communicate when in their native form and whether or not telepathy is permissible for an answer. Finally, note that "something basic" isn't basic at all. Useful communication requires a fair number of verbs and nouns (e.g., "spear"). How intelligent is this species?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Charades



You could have them shape shift into what they are trying to communicate, in the example you used, a shape shifter would turn into: a person, the number two, a compass pointing north, a spear and a horse.



However, this seems too comical and does not feel like it is in the spirit of what you are asking. Instead, i propose a more serious answer:



Morse Code



Perhaps one of the easiest forms of communication, it is simply a series of short stimuli and long stimuli. This could take the form of anything, the flashing of a light, the noise from the tapping on glass, even tapping on someone’s shoulder so they can feel it. With morse code you can say literally anything in the English language (or any language really, assuming you have sequences that correspond to all of the letters in its alphabet).



One issue with Morse code though is it takes a long time to communicate a message, every sentence is made up of a number of words, each word is made up of several letters, each letter is made up of several short and long stimuli. In short, it takes a long time, you want sentences to be as short as possible to be communicated as fast as possible.



Abbreviated Morse Code



As Morse code takes a long time to communicate, you could instead have codes for words or phrases. You would need a list of common words that your shape shifters would communicate and attach codes to them. For example “... - - - ...” means SOS. In English, SOS is not a word, it is however an abbreviation of Save Our Souls, indicating someone is in danger and needs help.



In your case, you may have abbreviations such as SRD (sword), SPR (spear) MAN/MEN (person/people), HRS (horse) etc. If you then string several of these abbreviations together, you can communicate phrases quite quickly.



You may even have secret phrases communicated through abbreviations. For example, “XRT” may mean “Be alert, the king has left the castle, ready your archers” but there is no possible way you could have guessed that is what XRT meant, not in the same way you could guess SPR means Spear. Only those who were told what the code meant would understand it, preventing spies from intercepting it.



An image showing the sequences and their corresponding letters or numbers for international morse code
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code



Here is a chart for International Morse Code so you can create your own abbreviations and know how to communicate them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

Ultrasonic clicks.



Albeit this is much more efficient in a liquid medium (so it's used by dolphins), an acceptable range might be achieved with an ultrasonic "clicking" organ and suitable ears (they needn't be too big).



This could also double as an active echo-location sonar, very useful for scouts.



Once the clicking mechanism is in place, you have a choice between a click-language or using clicks to code another language (this would be Morse code for example).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 hour ago


















0












$begingroup$

Option 1



They can shapeshift their skin to mimic the one of some octopi. In that way the skin can act as a screen, where messages can be displayed and read up to a certain distance. This would enable silent communication, which for certain types of mission is or paramount importance.



Option 2



They can keep a human vocal system, so that they can still articulate speech while in another form.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    59 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144440%2fhow-can-a-team-of-shapeshifters-communicate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Charades



You could have them shape shift into what they are trying to communicate, in the example you used, a shape shifter would turn into: a person, the number two, a compass pointing north, a spear and a horse.



However, this seems too comical and does not feel like it is in the spirit of what you are asking. Instead, i propose a more serious answer:



Morse Code



Perhaps one of the easiest forms of communication, it is simply a series of short stimuli and long stimuli. This could take the form of anything, the flashing of a light, the noise from the tapping on glass, even tapping on someone’s shoulder so they can feel it. With morse code you can say literally anything in the English language (or any language really, assuming you have sequences that correspond to all of the letters in its alphabet).



One issue with Morse code though is it takes a long time to communicate a message, every sentence is made up of a number of words, each word is made up of several letters, each letter is made up of several short and long stimuli. In short, it takes a long time, you want sentences to be as short as possible to be communicated as fast as possible.



Abbreviated Morse Code



As Morse code takes a long time to communicate, you could instead have codes for words or phrases. You would need a list of common words that your shape shifters would communicate and attach codes to them. For example “... - - - ...” means SOS. In English, SOS is not a word, it is however an abbreviation of Save Our Souls, indicating someone is in danger and needs help.



In your case, you may have abbreviations such as SRD (sword), SPR (spear) MAN/MEN (person/people), HRS (horse) etc. If you then string several of these abbreviations together, you can communicate phrases quite quickly.



You may even have secret phrases communicated through abbreviations. For example, “XRT” may mean “Be alert, the king has left the castle, ready your archers” but there is no possible way you could have guessed that is what XRT meant, not in the same way you could guess SPR means Spear. Only those who were told what the code meant would understand it, preventing spies from intercepting it.



An image showing the sequences and their corresponding letters or numbers for international morse code
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code



Here is a chart for International Morse Code so you can create your own abbreviations and know how to communicate them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

Charades



You could have them shape shift into what they are trying to communicate, in the example you used, a shape shifter would turn into: a person, the number two, a compass pointing north, a spear and a horse.



However, this seems too comical and does not feel like it is in the spirit of what you are asking. Instead, i propose a more serious answer:



Morse Code



Perhaps one of the easiest forms of communication, it is simply a series of short stimuli and long stimuli. This could take the form of anything, the flashing of a light, the noise from the tapping on glass, even tapping on someone’s shoulder so they can feel it. With morse code you can say literally anything in the English language (or any language really, assuming you have sequences that correspond to all of the letters in its alphabet).



One issue with Morse code though is it takes a long time to communicate a message, every sentence is made up of a number of words, each word is made up of several letters, each letter is made up of several short and long stimuli. In short, it takes a long time, you want sentences to be as short as possible to be communicated as fast as possible.



Abbreviated Morse Code



As Morse code takes a long time to communicate, you could instead have codes for words or phrases. You would need a list of common words that your shape shifters would communicate and attach codes to them. For example “... - - - ...” means SOS. In English, SOS is not a word, it is however an abbreviation of Save Our Souls, indicating someone is in danger and needs help.



In your case, you may have abbreviations such as SRD (sword), SPR (spear) MAN/MEN (person/people), HRS (horse) etc. If you then string several of these abbreviations together, you can communicate phrases quite quickly.



You may even have secret phrases communicated through abbreviations. For example, “XRT” may mean “Be alert, the king has left the castle, ready your archers” but there is no possible way you could have guessed that is what XRT meant, not in the same way you could guess SPR means Spear. Only those who were told what the code meant would understand it, preventing spies from intercepting it.



An image showing the sequences and their corresponding letters or numbers for international morse code
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code



Here is a chart for International Morse Code so you can create your own abbreviations and know how to communicate them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Charades



You could have them shape shift into what they are trying to communicate, in the example you used, a shape shifter would turn into: a person, the number two, a compass pointing north, a spear and a horse.



However, this seems too comical and does not feel like it is in the spirit of what you are asking. Instead, i propose a more serious answer:



Morse Code



Perhaps one of the easiest forms of communication, it is simply a series of short stimuli and long stimuli. This could take the form of anything, the flashing of a light, the noise from the tapping on glass, even tapping on someone’s shoulder so they can feel it. With morse code you can say literally anything in the English language (or any language really, assuming you have sequences that correspond to all of the letters in its alphabet).



One issue with Morse code though is it takes a long time to communicate a message, every sentence is made up of a number of words, each word is made up of several letters, each letter is made up of several short and long stimuli. In short, it takes a long time, you want sentences to be as short as possible to be communicated as fast as possible.



Abbreviated Morse Code



As Morse code takes a long time to communicate, you could instead have codes for words or phrases. You would need a list of common words that your shape shifters would communicate and attach codes to them. For example “... - - - ...” means SOS. In English, SOS is not a word, it is however an abbreviation of Save Our Souls, indicating someone is in danger and needs help.



In your case, you may have abbreviations such as SRD (sword), SPR (spear) MAN/MEN (person/people), HRS (horse) etc. If you then string several of these abbreviations together, you can communicate phrases quite quickly.



You may even have secret phrases communicated through abbreviations. For example, “XRT” may mean “Be alert, the king has left the castle, ready your archers” but there is no possible way you could have guessed that is what XRT meant, not in the same way you could guess SPR means Spear. Only those who were told what the code meant would understand it, preventing spies from intercepting it.



An image showing the sequences and their corresponding letters or numbers for international morse code
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code



Here is a chart for International Morse Code so you can create your own abbreviations and know how to communicate them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Charades



You could have them shape shift into what they are trying to communicate, in the example you used, a shape shifter would turn into: a person, the number two, a compass pointing north, a spear and a horse.



However, this seems too comical and does not feel like it is in the spirit of what you are asking. Instead, i propose a more serious answer:



Morse Code



Perhaps one of the easiest forms of communication, it is simply a series of short stimuli and long stimuli. This could take the form of anything, the flashing of a light, the noise from the tapping on glass, even tapping on someone’s shoulder so they can feel it. With morse code you can say literally anything in the English language (or any language really, assuming you have sequences that correspond to all of the letters in its alphabet).



One issue with Morse code though is it takes a long time to communicate a message, every sentence is made up of a number of words, each word is made up of several letters, each letter is made up of several short and long stimuli. In short, it takes a long time, you want sentences to be as short as possible to be communicated as fast as possible.



Abbreviated Morse Code



As Morse code takes a long time to communicate, you could instead have codes for words or phrases. You would need a list of common words that your shape shifters would communicate and attach codes to them. For example “... - - - ...” means SOS. In English, SOS is not a word, it is however an abbreviation of Save Our Souls, indicating someone is in danger and needs help.



In your case, you may have abbreviations such as SRD (sword), SPR (spear) MAN/MEN (person/people), HRS (horse) etc. If you then string several of these abbreviations together, you can communicate phrases quite quickly.



You may even have secret phrases communicated through abbreviations. For example, “XRT” may mean “Be alert, the king has left the castle, ready your archers” but there is no possible way you could have guessed that is what XRT meant, not in the same way you could guess SPR means Spear. Only those who were told what the code meant would understand it, preventing spies from intercepting it.



An image showing the sequences and their corresponding letters or numbers for international morse code
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code



Here is a chart for International Morse Code so you can create your own abbreviations and know how to communicate them.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 3 hours ago









Liam MorrisLiam Morris

2,359431




2,359431











  • $begingroup$
    Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
    $endgroup$
    – a CVn
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
$endgroup$
– a CVn
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Unrelated to your answer per se, but SOS is a prosign, not three distinct letters. Sent properly in Morse code, it's ...---... with no extra spacing (not ... --- ..., as if it were three letters), but with the "dashes" elongenated to be clearly distinguishable from the "dots". Writing it out as SOS is just convention; for example VTB would also come out to ...---... if sent as a prosign.
$endgroup$
– a CVn
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thoughtful answer. You are right that a form of morse might be time consuming, but I think this is a good idea that might work well, especially if their version of morse was specifically developed with short abbreviations and team communication in mind. It also has the capacity to be pretty quiet if necessary, which could be handy for stealth.
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago











2












$begingroup$

Ultrasonic clicks.



Albeit this is much more efficient in a liquid medium (so it's used by dolphins), an acceptable range might be achieved with an ultrasonic "clicking" organ and suitable ears (they needn't be too big).



This could also double as an active echo-location sonar, very useful for scouts.



Once the clicking mechanism is in place, you have a choice between a click-language or using clicks to code another language (this would be Morse code for example).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 hour ago















2












$begingroup$

Ultrasonic clicks.



Albeit this is much more efficient in a liquid medium (so it's used by dolphins), an acceptable range might be achieved with an ultrasonic "clicking" organ and suitable ears (they needn't be too big).



This could also double as an active echo-location sonar, very useful for scouts.



Once the clicking mechanism is in place, you have a choice between a click-language or using clicks to code another language (this would be Morse code for example).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 hour ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Ultrasonic clicks.



Albeit this is much more efficient in a liquid medium (so it's used by dolphins), an acceptable range might be achieved with an ultrasonic "clicking" organ and suitable ears (they needn't be too big).



This could also double as an active echo-location sonar, very useful for scouts.



Once the clicking mechanism is in place, you have a choice between a click-language or using clicks to code another language (this would be Morse code for example).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Ultrasonic clicks.



Albeit this is much more efficient in a liquid medium (so it's used by dolphins), an acceptable range might be achieved with an ultrasonic "clicking" organ and suitable ears (they needn't be too big).



This could also double as an active echo-location sonar, very useful for scouts.



Once the clicking mechanism is in place, you have a choice between a click-language or using clicks to code another language (this would be Morse code for example).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 2 hours ago









LSerniLSerni

30.2k25398




30.2k25398







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – LSerni
    1 hour ago







2




2




$begingroup$
This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
This could perhaps be combined with Liam Morris' answer for interesting results.
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
You probably meant ultrasonic. Sound waves cannot be supersonic.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
2 hours ago













$begingroup$
@L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– LSerni
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@L.Dutch yes, of course. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– LSerni
1 hour ago











0












$begingroup$

Option 1



They can shapeshift their skin to mimic the one of some octopi. In that way the skin can act as a screen, where messages can be displayed and read up to a certain distance. This would enable silent communication, which for certain types of mission is or paramount importance.



Option 2



They can keep a human vocal system, so that they can still articulate speech while in another form.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    59 mins ago















0












$begingroup$

Option 1



They can shapeshift their skin to mimic the one of some octopi. In that way the skin can act as a screen, where messages can be displayed and read up to a certain distance. This would enable silent communication, which for certain types of mission is or paramount importance.



Option 2



They can keep a human vocal system, so that they can still articulate speech while in another form.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    59 mins ago













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Option 1



They can shapeshift their skin to mimic the one of some octopi. In that way the skin can act as a screen, where messages can be displayed and read up to a certain distance. This would enable silent communication, which for certain types of mission is or paramount importance.



Option 2



They can keep a human vocal system, so that they can still articulate speech while in another form.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Option 1



They can shapeshift their skin to mimic the one of some octopi. In that way the skin can act as a screen, where messages can be displayed and read up to a certain distance. This would enable silent communication, which for certain types of mission is or paramount importance.



Option 2



They can keep a human vocal system, so that they can still articulate speech while in another form.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









L.DutchL.Dutch

92.2k29213443




92.2k29213443







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    59 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    59 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Option 1 sounds interesting, displaying messages on yourself. Though if you had fur it might be harder! Option 2 I considered, but I'm not sure that the shape of, say, a wolf's head and mouth would allow some kinds of normal speech, even if a human voicebox, etc. was retained. After all, we make a lot of sounds by manipulating our tongue and lips, not just our vocal tract
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
@MarielS A possible work around for that is to use a bird-like voice box, parrots can famously make noises that sound like human speech and they do not posses lips or a tongue like a human’s (even if the noise is not a perfect mimicry of a human’s voice). This may not work in your shape-shifting system though.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
@LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
$endgroup$
– MarielS
59 mins ago




$begingroup$
@LiamMorris You're right, they can! Food for thought
$endgroup$
– MarielS
59 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144440%2fhow-can-a-team-of-shapeshifters-communicate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

На ростанях Змест Гісторыя напісання | Месца дзеяння | Час дзеяння | Назва | Праблематыка трылогіі | Аўтабіяграфічнасць | Трылогія ў тэатры і кіно | Пераклады | У культуры | Зноскі Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаАкадэмік МІЦКЕВІЧ Канстанцін Міхайлавіч (Якуб Колас) Прадмова М. І. Мушынскага, доктара філалагічных навук, члена-карэспандэнта Нацыянальнай акадэміі навук Рэспублікі Беларусь, прафесараНашаніўцы ў трылогіі Якуба Коласа «На ростанях»: вобразы і прататыпы125 лет Янке МавруКнижно-документальная выставка к 125-летию со дня рождения Якуба Коласа (1882—1956)Колас Якуб. Новая зямля (паэма), На ростанях (трылогія). Сулкоўскі Уладзімір. Радзіма Якуба Коласа (серыял жывапісных палотнаў)Вокладка кнігіІлюстрацыя М. С. БасалыгіНа ростаняхАўдыёверсія трылогііВ. Жолтак У Люсiнскай школе 1959

Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп