SOQL query causes internal Salesforce error2019 Community Moderator ElectionError selecting User.SmallProfileUrl from UserFeed query with SOQLNo such column 'AccountNumber' on entity 'Name'Internal Service Error when using not null in Geolocation SOQLSearch by '.' causes non-selective query exceptionNo records returned from SOQL query on FeedComment with Left Inner JoinSOQL error on enabling namespaceSoql outer query exceptionINVALID_FIELD on SOQL Query through REST APIWhy are the columns of the SOQL query result not in the order of the fields in the SELECT?SOQL query to extract only the most recent attachment IDs

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

Echo with obfuscation

Isometric embedding of a genus g surface

If the only attacker is removed from combat, is a creature still counted as having attacked this turn?

Animation: customize bounce interpolation

Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

How much do grades matter for a future academia position?

Determining multivariate least squares with constraint

Why is the sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

Adding up numbers in Portuguese is strange

Personal or impersonal in a technical resume

Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match

Purpose of creating non root user

Cumulative Sum using Java 8 stream API

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Can I run 125khz RF circuit on a breadboard?

Alignment of six matrices

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

"Oh no!" in Latin

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?

Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors

Proving a complicated language is not a CFL



SOQL query causes internal Salesforce error



2019 Community Moderator ElectionError selecting User.SmallProfileUrl from UserFeed query with SOQLNo such column 'AccountNumber' on entity 'Name'Internal Service Error when using not null in Geolocation SOQLSearch by '.' causes non-selective query exceptionNo records returned from SOQL query on FeedComment with Left Inner JoinSOQL error on enabling namespaceSoql outer query exceptionINVALID_FIELD on SOQL Query through REST APIWhy are the columns of the SOQL query result not in the order of the fields in the SELECT?SOQL query to extract only the most recent attachment IDs










4















I've hit an unhandled exception when writing a query, and I'm curious if anyone here has seen the same thing. This is not a timeout issue - the error happens almost immediately, so it's not a query efficiency issue. The following query causes an "Internal Salesforce.com Error":
(Note that End_Client__c is an Account lookup on Opportunity, and accountIds is a Set<Id> of parents of both Account and End Client)



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
Id IN :accountIds
OR ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


However, it is fixed if I reduce the number of items in the OR chain to 2, regardless of which items I select. This means the merge fields are not the issue causing the error. The following works successfully:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


I was fortunately able to find a workaround, which has left me even more confused. I changed the query to less efficient logic. The query below evaluates properly, which suggests to me that the query parser is failing.



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE (Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Id IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
ORDER By Name
]


Can anyone shed some light on what is going on here?










share|improve this question






















  • How many items are in your Set<Id>? I can't repo this with 50.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • Can you provide something that runs in the developer console that crashes? I'm unable to repo it on my org.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • @battery.cord see my answer below. The issue had to do with the accountIds set containing only the excluded opp.AccountId

    – SFDC Neuf
    1 hour ago















4















I've hit an unhandled exception when writing a query, and I'm curious if anyone here has seen the same thing. This is not a timeout issue - the error happens almost immediately, so it's not a query efficiency issue. The following query causes an "Internal Salesforce.com Error":
(Note that End_Client__c is an Account lookup on Opportunity, and accountIds is a Set<Id> of parents of both Account and End Client)



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
Id IN :accountIds
OR ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


However, it is fixed if I reduce the number of items in the OR chain to 2, regardless of which items I select. This means the merge fields are not the issue causing the error. The following works successfully:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


I was fortunately able to find a workaround, which has left me even more confused. I changed the query to less efficient logic. The query below evaluates properly, which suggests to me that the query parser is failing.



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE (Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Id IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
ORDER By Name
]


Can anyone shed some light on what is going on here?










share|improve this question






















  • How many items are in your Set<Id>? I can't repo this with 50.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • Can you provide something that runs in the developer console that crashes? I'm unable to repo it on my org.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • @battery.cord see my answer below. The issue had to do with the accountIds set containing only the excluded opp.AccountId

    – SFDC Neuf
    1 hour ago













4












4








4








I've hit an unhandled exception when writing a query, and I'm curious if anyone here has seen the same thing. This is not a timeout issue - the error happens almost immediately, so it's not a query efficiency issue. The following query causes an "Internal Salesforce.com Error":
(Note that End_Client__c is an Account lookup on Opportunity, and accountIds is a Set<Id> of parents of both Account and End Client)



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
Id IN :accountIds
OR ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


However, it is fixed if I reduce the number of items in the OR chain to 2, regardless of which items I select. This means the merge fields are not the issue causing the error. The following works successfully:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


I was fortunately able to find a workaround, which has left me even more confused. I changed the query to less efficient logic. The query below evaluates properly, which suggests to me that the query parser is failing.



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE (Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Id IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
ORDER By Name
]


Can anyone shed some light on what is going on here?










share|improve this question














I've hit an unhandled exception when writing a query, and I'm curious if anyone here has seen the same thing. This is not a timeout issue - the error happens almost immediately, so it's not a query efficiency issue. The following query causes an "Internal Salesforce.com Error":
(Note that End_Client__c is an Account lookup on Opportunity, and accountIds is a Set<Id> of parents of both Account and End Client)



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
Id IN :accountIds
OR ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


However, it is fixed if I reduce the number of items in the OR chain to 2, regardless of which items I select. This means the merge fields are not the issue causing the error. The following works successfully:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND (
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
)
ORDER By Name
]


I was fortunately able to find a workaround, which has left me even more confused. I changed the query to less efficient logic. The query below evaluates properly, which suggests to me that the query parser is failing.



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE (Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Id IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
OR
(Id != :opp.AccountId
AND Id != :opp.End_Client__c
AND Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds)
ORDER By Name
]


Can anyone shed some light on what is going on here?







apex soql error






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









SFDC NeufSFDC Neuf

743522




743522












  • How many items are in your Set<Id>? I can't repo this with 50.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • Can you provide something that runs in the developer console that crashes? I'm unable to repo it on my org.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • @battery.cord see my answer below. The issue had to do with the accountIds set containing only the excluded opp.AccountId

    – SFDC Neuf
    1 hour ago

















  • How many items are in your Set<Id>? I can't repo this with 50.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • Can you provide something that runs in the developer console that crashes? I'm unable to repo it on my org.

    – battery.cord
    2 hours ago











  • @battery.cord see my answer below. The issue had to do with the accountIds set containing only the excluded opp.AccountId

    – SFDC Neuf
    1 hour ago
















How many items are in your Set<Id>? I can't repo this with 50.

– battery.cord
2 hours ago





How many items are in your Set<Id>? I can't repo this with 50.

– battery.cord
2 hours ago













Can you provide something that runs in the developer console that crashes? I'm unable to repo it on my org.

– battery.cord
2 hours ago





Can you provide something that runs in the developer console that crashes? I'm unable to repo it on my org.

– battery.cord
2 hours ago













@battery.cord see my answer below. The issue had to do with the accountIds set containing only the excluded opp.AccountId

– SFDC Neuf
1 hour ago





@battery.cord see my answer below. The issue had to do with the accountIds set containing only the excluded opp.AccountId

– SFDC Neuf
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














After a bit of investigation with explicitly stated IDs, I think I found the unique issue that causes the error, and it can be handled more elegantly than my workaround.



Upon further investigation, the error is only happening when accountIds contains only opp.AccountId.



This fails:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
AND Id != null
AND (
Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
)
ORDER By Name
]


This succeeds:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
AND Id != null
AND (
ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
)
ORDER By Name
]


And this also succeeds:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
AND Id != null
AND (
Id IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
)
ORDER By Name
]


So the it appears the parser has a hard time dealing with the contradictory inclusion statements. I can create a second set to eliminate the issue.



One last thing - this succeeds:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
AND Id != null
AND (
Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
)
ORDER By Name
]


But this fails:



[
SELECT Name
FROM Account
WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
AND Id != null
AND (
Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
)
ORDER By Name
]


So it appears that in order to cause the error, there needs to be both the contradictory statement and at least 2 other inclusion statements within the OR.






share|improve this answer
































    0














    Anecdotally, This query runs fine (via the developer consoles query editor) on one of my sandboxes:



    SELECT Name, ID
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != ''
    AND Id != ''
    AND (
    Id IN ('')
    OR ParentId IN ('')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
    )
    ORDER By Name


    Using static id lists also works fine:



    SELECT Name, ID
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
    AND Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
    AND (
    Id IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
    OR ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
    )
    ORDER By Name


    Heres some code I used in the developer consoles execute anonymous code window:



    Id someId = '001U000100qh0xJIAQ';
    Id someOtherId = '001U000700qh0xJIAQ';

    Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>([SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 1000]).keySet();

    System.debug([
    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != :someId
    AND Id != :someOtherId
    AND (
    Id IN :accountIds
    OR ParentId IN :accountIds
    OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
    )
    ORDER By Name
    ]);


    Even trying to look for 1000 items in 4 separate clauses I can't repo your error.




    Heres the results of running some queries on my org:



    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name



    No Results, but no crash.




    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name



    [object Object]: An unexpected error occurred. Please include this ErrorId if you contact support: 1038235189-47553 (730406045)




    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name



    No results




    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name



    No results.




    I have no idea why exactly it fails but it seems like adding that 3rd clause to the AND causes the failure. If it was just the ID != '' && Id == '' issue, I'd expect the first one to fail.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      I think you meant "repro".

      – Adrian Larson
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

      – SFDC Neuf
      1 hour ago






    • 2





      I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

      – Derek F
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "459"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f254657%2fsoql-query-causes-internal-salesforce-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    After a bit of investigation with explicitly stated IDs, I think I found the unique issue that causes the error, and it can be handled more elegantly than my workaround.



    Upon further investigation, the error is only happening when accountIds contains only opp.AccountId.



    This fails:



    [
    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name
    ]


    This succeeds:



    [
    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name
    ]


    And this also succeeds:



    [
    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name
    ]


    So the it appears the parser has a hard time dealing with the contradictory inclusion statements. I can create a second set to eliminate the issue.



    One last thing - this succeeds:



    [
    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name
    ]


    But this fails:



    [
    SELECT Name
    FROM Account
    WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
    AND Id != null
    AND (
    Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
    )
    ORDER By Name
    ]


    So it appears that in order to cause the error, there needs to be both the contradictory statement and at least 2 other inclusion statements within the OR.






    share|improve this answer





























      3














      After a bit of investigation with explicitly stated IDs, I think I found the unique issue that causes the error, and it can be handled more elegantly than my workaround.



      Upon further investigation, the error is only happening when accountIds contains only opp.AccountId.



      This fails:



      [
      SELECT Name
      FROM Account
      WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
      AND Id != null
      AND (
      Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      )
      ORDER By Name
      ]


      This succeeds:



      [
      SELECT Name
      FROM Account
      WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
      AND Id != null
      AND (
      ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      )
      ORDER By Name
      ]


      And this also succeeds:



      [
      SELECT Name
      FROM Account
      WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
      AND Id != null
      AND (
      Id IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      )
      ORDER By Name
      ]


      So the it appears the parser has a hard time dealing with the contradictory inclusion statements. I can create a second set to eliminate the issue.



      One last thing - this succeeds:



      [
      SELECT Name
      FROM Account
      WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
      AND Id != null
      AND (
      Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      )
      ORDER By Name
      ]


      But this fails:



      [
      SELECT Name
      FROM Account
      WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
      AND Id != null
      AND (
      Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
      )
      ORDER By Name
      ]


      So it appears that in order to cause the error, there needs to be both the contradictory statement and at least 2 other inclusion statements within the OR.






      share|improve this answer



























        3












        3








        3







        After a bit of investigation with explicitly stated IDs, I think I found the unique issue that causes the error, and it can be handled more elegantly than my workaround.



        Upon further investigation, the error is only happening when accountIds contains only opp.AccountId.



        This fails:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        This succeeds:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        And this also succeeds:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        So the it appears the parser has a hard time dealing with the contradictory inclusion statements. I can create a second set to eliminate the issue.



        One last thing - this succeeds:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        But this fails:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        So it appears that in order to cause the error, there needs to be both the contradictory statement and at least 2 other inclusion statements within the OR.






        share|improve this answer















        After a bit of investigation with explicitly stated IDs, I think I found the unique issue that causes the error, and it can be handled more elegantly than my workaround.



        Upon further investigation, the error is only happening when accountIds contains only opp.AccountId.



        This fails:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        This succeeds:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        And this also succeeds:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000VqDVWAA3','0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        So the it appears the parser has a hard time dealing with the contradictory inclusion statements. I can create a second set to eliminate the issue.



        One last thing - this succeeds:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        But this fails:



        [
        SELECT Name
        FROM Account
        WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
        AND Id != null
        AND (
        Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        OR Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
        )
        ORDER By Name
        ]


        So it appears that in order to cause the error, there needs to be both the contradictory statement and at least 2 other inclusion statements within the OR.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        SFDC NeufSFDC Neuf

        743522




        743522























            0














            Anecdotally, This query runs fine (via the developer consoles query editor) on one of my sandboxes:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != ''
            AND Id != ''
            AND (
            Id IN ('')
            OR ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Using static id lists also works fine:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND (
            Id IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Heres some code I used in the developer consoles execute anonymous code window:



            Id someId = '001U000100qh0xJIAQ';
            Id someOtherId = '001U000700qh0xJIAQ';

            Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>([SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 1000]).keySet();

            System.debug([
            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != :someId
            AND Id != :someOtherId
            AND (
            Id IN :accountIds
            OR ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            )
            ORDER By Name
            ]);


            Even trying to look for 1000 items in 4 separate clauses I can't repo your error.




            Heres the results of running some queries on my org:



            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No Results, but no crash.




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            [object Object]: An unexpected error occurred. Please include this ErrorId if you contact support: 1038235189-47553 (730406045)




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results.




            I have no idea why exactly it fails but it seems like adding that 3rd clause to the AND causes the failure. If it was just the ID != '' && Id == '' issue, I'd expect the first one to fail.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              I think you meant "repro".

              – Adrian Larson
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

              – SFDC Neuf
              1 hour ago






            • 2





              I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

              – Derek F
              1 hour ago
















            0














            Anecdotally, This query runs fine (via the developer consoles query editor) on one of my sandboxes:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != ''
            AND Id != ''
            AND (
            Id IN ('')
            OR ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Using static id lists also works fine:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND (
            Id IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Heres some code I used in the developer consoles execute anonymous code window:



            Id someId = '001U000100qh0xJIAQ';
            Id someOtherId = '001U000700qh0xJIAQ';

            Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>([SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 1000]).keySet();

            System.debug([
            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != :someId
            AND Id != :someOtherId
            AND (
            Id IN :accountIds
            OR ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            )
            ORDER By Name
            ]);


            Even trying to look for 1000 items in 4 separate clauses I can't repo your error.




            Heres the results of running some queries on my org:



            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No Results, but no crash.




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            [object Object]: An unexpected error occurred. Please include this ErrorId if you contact support: 1038235189-47553 (730406045)




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results.




            I have no idea why exactly it fails but it seems like adding that 3rd clause to the AND causes the failure. If it was just the ID != '' && Id == '' issue, I'd expect the first one to fail.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              I think you meant "repro".

              – Adrian Larson
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

              – SFDC Neuf
              1 hour ago






            • 2





              I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

              – Derek F
              1 hour ago














            0












            0








            0







            Anecdotally, This query runs fine (via the developer consoles query editor) on one of my sandboxes:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != ''
            AND Id != ''
            AND (
            Id IN ('')
            OR ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Using static id lists also works fine:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND (
            Id IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Heres some code I used in the developer consoles execute anonymous code window:



            Id someId = '001U000100qh0xJIAQ';
            Id someOtherId = '001U000700qh0xJIAQ';

            Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>([SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 1000]).keySet();

            System.debug([
            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != :someId
            AND Id != :someOtherId
            AND (
            Id IN :accountIds
            OR ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            )
            ORDER By Name
            ]);


            Even trying to look for 1000 items in 4 separate clauses I can't repo your error.




            Heres the results of running some queries on my org:



            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No Results, but no crash.




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            [object Object]: An unexpected error occurred. Please include this ErrorId if you contact support: 1038235189-47553 (730406045)




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results.




            I have no idea why exactly it fails but it seems like adding that 3rd clause to the AND causes the failure. If it was just the ID != '' && Id == '' issue, I'd expect the first one to fail.






            share|improve this answer















            Anecdotally, This query runs fine (via the developer consoles query editor) on one of my sandboxes:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != ''
            AND Id != ''
            AND (
            Id IN ('')
            OR ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Using static id lists also works fine:



            SELECT Name, ID
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND Id != '001U000100qh0xJIAQ'
            AND (
            Id IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('001U000000ASKzzIAH')
            )
            ORDER By Name


            Heres some code I used in the developer consoles execute anonymous code window:



            Id someId = '001U000100qh0xJIAQ';
            Id someOtherId = '001U000700qh0xJIAQ';

            Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>([SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 1000]).keySet();

            System.debug([
            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != :someId
            AND Id != :someOtherId
            AND (
            Id IN :accountIds
            OR ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN :accountIds
            )
            ORDER By Name
            ]);


            Even trying to look for 1000 items in 4 separate clauses I can't repo your error.




            Heres the results of running some queries on my org:



            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No Results, but no crash.




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            [object Object]: An unexpected error occurred. Please include this ErrorId if you contact support: 1038235189-47553 (730406045)




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results




            SELECT Name
            FROM Account
            WHERE Id != '0014000000SQyVGAA1'
            AND Id != null
            AND (
            Id IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            OR Parent.Parent.ParentId IN ('0014000000SQyVGAA1')
            )
            ORDER By Name



            No results.




            I have no idea why exactly it fails but it seems like adding that 3rd clause to the AND causes the failure. If it was just the ID != '' && Id == '' issue, I'd expect the first one to fail.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            battery.cordbattery.cord

            6,97351746




            6,97351746







            • 2





              I think you meant "repro".

              – Adrian Larson
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

              – SFDC Neuf
              1 hour ago






            • 2





              I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

              – Derek F
              1 hour ago













            • 2





              I think you meant "repro".

              – Adrian Larson
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

              – SFDC Neuf
              1 hour ago






            • 2





              I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

              – Derek F
              1 hour ago








            2




            2





            I think you meant "repro".

            – Adrian Larson
            1 hour ago





            I think you meant "repro".

            – Adrian Larson
            1 hour ago




            1




            1





            Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

            – SFDC Neuf
            1 hour ago





            Exactly my findings. Always fun to find a weird edge case where things break.

            – SFDC Neuf
            1 hour ago




            2




            2





            I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

            – Derek F
            1 hour ago






            I dunno, the image of showing up to someone else's place of work, putting some chains around the workstation, tying it to a car, and gunning it to "repo" the error sounds like pretty good entertainment to me. :p

            – Derek F
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f254657%2fsoql-query-causes-internal-salesforce-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

            Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

            Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery