Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDoes the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

How to colour the US map with Yellow, Green, Red and Blue to minimize the number of states with the colour of Green

Autumning in love

How to pour concrete for curved walkway to prevent cracking?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

Simulating Exploding Dice

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]

What kind of display is this?

Estimate capacitor parameters

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Can a monk deflect thrown melee weapons?

Why use gamma over alpha radiation?

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?

Aligning matrix of nodes with grid

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

How did the aliens keep their waters separated?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?



Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDoes the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








9















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago

















9















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago













9












9








9








A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.







c++






share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Fomar putesFomar putes

483




483




New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago

















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago
















I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
2 hours ago





I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
2 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





share|improve this answer























  • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    29 mins ago


















1














The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer























    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      29 mins ago















    4














    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer























    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      29 mins ago













    4












    4








    4







    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer













    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    Ben Chaliah AyoubBen Chaliah Ayoub

    2,422217




    2,422217












    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      29 mins ago

















    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      29 mins ago
















    Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    29 mins ago





    Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    29 mins ago













    1














    The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






        share|improve this answer













        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Davis HerringDavis Herring

        9,1001736




        9,1001736




















            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

            ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

            Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery