Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do insects decrease aircraft performance?How to draw NACA 6-Series Airfoils?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?What is the relation between the Lift Coefficient and the Angle of Attack?Is it possible to fly horizontally with zero angle of attack?How to find trim condition of a sectional airfoil without knowing the angle of attack?What is the effect of flow separation on lift, pressure distribution and drag?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?Do negative angles-of-attack create lift?How do you calculate the lift coefficient of an airfoil at zero angle of attack?Calculating induced drag approximation using XFoil generated parasitic dragDoes speed or angle of attack generally have the greatest impact on total induced drag?What's the theoretical background of the critical angle of attack?

Direct Experience of Meditation

What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

grandmas drink with lemon juice

What loss function to use when labels are probabilities?

Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Passing functions in C++

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Can I add database to AWS RDS MySQL without creating new instance?

Area of a 2D convex hull

Simulating Exploding Dice

Strange behaviour of Check

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?



Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do insects decrease aircraft performance?How to draw NACA 6-Series Airfoils?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?What is the relation between the Lift Coefficient and the Angle of Attack?Is it possible to fly horizontally with zero angle of attack?How to find trim condition of a sectional airfoil without knowing the angle of attack?What is the effect of flow separation on lift, pressure distribution and drag?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?Do negative angles-of-attack create lift?How do you calculate the lift coefficient of an airfoil at zero angle of attack?Calculating induced drag approximation using XFoil generated parasitic dragDoes speed or angle of attack generally have the greatest impact on total induced drag?What's the theoretical background of the critical angle of attack?










1












$begingroup$


The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.










share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    7 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.










share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    7 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.










share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.







aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack






share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









simple jacksimple jack

103




103




New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



flap polar



This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



    The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



    $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



    For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
      $endgroup$
      – simple jack
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Kämpf
      3 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "528"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62357%2fis-drag-coefficient-lowest-at-zero-angle-of-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



    However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



    flap polar



    This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



    What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



    The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



    Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



    If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



      However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



      flap polar



      This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



      What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



      The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



      Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



      If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



        However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



        flap polar



        This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



        What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



        The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



        Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



        If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



        However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



        flap polar



        This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



        What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



        The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



        Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



        If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Peter KämpfPeter Kämpf

        162k12411656




        162k12411656





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              3 hours ago















            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              3 hours ago













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago









            simple jack

            103




            103










            answered 7 hours ago









            BrilsmurfffjeBrilsmurfffje

            3,41621536




            3,41621536











            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              3 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              3 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
            $endgroup$
            – simple jack
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
            $endgroup$
            – simple jack
            6 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Kämpf
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Kämpf
            3 hours ago










            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62357%2fis-drag-coefficient-lowest-at-zero-angle-of-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

            Partai Komunis Tiongkok Daftar isi Kepemimpinan | Pranala luar | Referensi | Menu navigasidiperiksa1 perubahan tertundacpc.people.com.cnSitus resmiSurat kabar resmi"Why the Communist Party is alive, well and flourishing in China"0307-1235"Full text of Constitution of Communist Party of China"smengembangkannyas

            ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result