Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?To wrap the external lines so that it can touch the perimeterDraw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cm
What loss function to use when labels are probabilities?
How to set letter above or below the symbol?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?
When is phishing education going too far?
Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection
How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?
Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?
Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"
Slither Like a Snake
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Fishing simulator
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
Training a classifier when some of the features are unknown
Stopping real property loss from eroding embankment
grandmas drink with lemon juice
What is the order of Mitzvot in Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot?
How do I automatically answer y in bash script?
What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?
Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?To wrap the external lines so that it can touch the perimeterDraw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cm
Background. I recently came across a Youtube video with a bunch of really nicely typeset 'diagram chases' that seem to have been made in TeX (perhaps TikZ?):
I'd like to create something similar for a presentation that I'm working on, but I feel a bit lost when it comes to figuring out a systematic/scalable way to this.
Own attempt. For small diagrams, it's possible to do this in a very ad hoc way, by just playing around with coordinates and the bend right
and bend left
attributes in TikZ. A quick example of what this might look like:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=1.5, bend left=15, bend right=15]
node (B) at (0,0) $B$;
node (B') at (0,-1) $B'$;
node (C) at (1,0) $C$;
node (C') at (1,-1) $C'$;
draw[->,gray] (B) -- (B');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B') -- (C');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B) -- (C);
draw[->,gray] (C) -- (C');
node (b) at (-0.3,0.2) footnotesize $b$;
node (bprime) at (-0.3,-1.2) footnotesize $b'$;
node (cbar) at (0.7,0.2) footnotesize $barc$;
node (cdiff) at (0.7,-1.3) footnotesize $c'-c''$;
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend left] node [left] (cbar);
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (bprime);
path (bprime) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (cdiff);
path (cbar) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right, shorten >= -2pt, shorten <= -1pt] node [left] (cdiff);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
I think this gives a decent end result. But for larger diagrams, it would be an absolute nightmare to work with a code that is so messy and so heavily dependent on coordinates and tweaked parameters.
Thus, if anyone has suggestions (big or small) for a more clever way to do this (with or without TikZ) and/or a way to make my own approach a bit cleaner or more systematic somehow, that would be greatly appreciated!
tikz-pgf diagrams tikz-cd commutative-diagrams
add a comment |
Background. I recently came across a Youtube video with a bunch of really nicely typeset 'diagram chases' that seem to have been made in TeX (perhaps TikZ?):
I'd like to create something similar for a presentation that I'm working on, but I feel a bit lost when it comes to figuring out a systematic/scalable way to this.
Own attempt. For small diagrams, it's possible to do this in a very ad hoc way, by just playing around with coordinates and the bend right
and bend left
attributes in TikZ. A quick example of what this might look like:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=1.5, bend left=15, bend right=15]
node (B) at (0,0) $B$;
node (B') at (0,-1) $B'$;
node (C) at (1,0) $C$;
node (C') at (1,-1) $C'$;
draw[->,gray] (B) -- (B');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B') -- (C');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B) -- (C);
draw[->,gray] (C) -- (C');
node (b) at (-0.3,0.2) footnotesize $b$;
node (bprime) at (-0.3,-1.2) footnotesize $b'$;
node (cbar) at (0.7,0.2) footnotesize $barc$;
node (cdiff) at (0.7,-1.3) footnotesize $c'-c''$;
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend left] node [left] (cbar);
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (bprime);
path (bprime) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (cdiff);
path (cbar) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right, shorten >= -2pt, shorten <= -1pt] node [left] (cdiff);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
I think this gives a decent end result. But for larger diagrams, it would be an absolute nightmare to work with a code that is so messy and so heavily dependent on coordinates and tweaked parameters.
Thus, if anyone has suggestions (big or small) for a more clever way to do this (with or without TikZ) and/or a way to make my own approach a bit cleaner or more systematic somehow, that would be greatly appreciated!
tikz-pgf diagrams tikz-cd commutative-diagrams
The diagram was created with a very nice tool, but that is not TikZ (as far as I can see). Anyway, it is always possible to create the diagram using TikZ.
– JouleV
2 hours ago
Any other tools that you think could be useful? I'm definitely willing to try out other tools than TikZ if need be!
– Oskar Henriksson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Background. I recently came across a Youtube video with a bunch of really nicely typeset 'diagram chases' that seem to have been made in TeX (perhaps TikZ?):
I'd like to create something similar for a presentation that I'm working on, but I feel a bit lost when it comes to figuring out a systematic/scalable way to this.
Own attempt. For small diagrams, it's possible to do this in a very ad hoc way, by just playing around with coordinates and the bend right
and bend left
attributes in TikZ. A quick example of what this might look like:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=1.5, bend left=15, bend right=15]
node (B) at (0,0) $B$;
node (B') at (0,-1) $B'$;
node (C) at (1,0) $C$;
node (C') at (1,-1) $C'$;
draw[->,gray] (B) -- (B');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B') -- (C');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B) -- (C);
draw[->,gray] (C) -- (C');
node (b) at (-0.3,0.2) footnotesize $b$;
node (bprime) at (-0.3,-1.2) footnotesize $b'$;
node (cbar) at (0.7,0.2) footnotesize $barc$;
node (cdiff) at (0.7,-1.3) footnotesize $c'-c''$;
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend left] node [left] (cbar);
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (bprime);
path (bprime) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (cdiff);
path (cbar) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right, shorten >= -2pt, shorten <= -1pt] node [left] (cdiff);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
I think this gives a decent end result. But for larger diagrams, it would be an absolute nightmare to work with a code that is so messy and so heavily dependent on coordinates and tweaked parameters.
Thus, if anyone has suggestions (big or small) for a more clever way to do this (with or without TikZ) and/or a way to make my own approach a bit cleaner or more systematic somehow, that would be greatly appreciated!
tikz-pgf diagrams tikz-cd commutative-diagrams
Background. I recently came across a Youtube video with a bunch of really nicely typeset 'diagram chases' that seem to have been made in TeX (perhaps TikZ?):
I'd like to create something similar for a presentation that I'm working on, but I feel a bit lost when it comes to figuring out a systematic/scalable way to this.
Own attempt. For small diagrams, it's possible to do this in a very ad hoc way, by just playing around with coordinates and the bend right
and bend left
attributes in TikZ. A quick example of what this might look like:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows.meta
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=1.5, bend left=15, bend right=15]
node (B) at (0,0) $B$;
node (B') at (0,-1) $B'$;
node (C) at (1,0) $C$;
node (C') at (1,-1) $C'$;
draw[->,gray] (B) -- (B');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B') -- (C');
draw[->,gray,shorten >= -1pt] (B) -- (C);
draw[->,gray] (C) -- (C');
node (b) at (-0.3,0.2) footnotesize $b$;
node (bprime) at (-0.3,-1.2) footnotesize $b'$;
node (cbar) at (0.7,0.2) footnotesize $barc$;
node (cdiff) at (0.7,-1.3) footnotesize $c'-c''$;
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend left] node [left] (cbar);
path (b) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (bprime);
path (bprime) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right] node [left] (cdiff);
path (cbar) edge [[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],bend right, shorten >= -2pt, shorten <= -1pt] node [left] (cdiff);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
I think this gives a decent end result. But for larger diagrams, it would be an absolute nightmare to work with a code that is so messy and so heavily dependent on coordinates and tweaked parameters.
Thus, if anyone has suggestions (big or small) for a more clever way to do this (with or without TikZ) and/or a way to make my own approach a bit cleaner or more systematic somehow, that would be greatly appreciated!
tikz-pgf diagrams tikz-cd commutative-diagrams
tikz-pgf diagrams tikz-cd commutative-diagrams
edited 39 mins ago
JouleV
13.5k22664
13.5k22664
asked 2 hours ago
Oskar HenrikssonOskar Henriksson
1256
1256
The diagram was created with a very nice tool, but that is not TikZ (as far as I can see). Anyway, it is always possible to create the diagram using TikZ.
– JouleV
2 hours ago
Any other tools that you think could be useful? I'm definitely willing to try out other tools than TikZ if need be!
– Oskar Henriksson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The diagram was created with a very nice tool, but that is not TikZ (as far as I can see). Anyway, it is always possible to create the diagram using TikZ.
– JouleV
2 hours ago
Any other tools that you think could be useful? I'm definitely willing to try out other tools than TikZ if need be!
– Oskar Henriksson
1 hour ago
The diagram was created with a very nice tool, but that is not TikZ (as far as I can see). Anyway, it is always possible to create the diagram using TikZ.
– JouleV
2 hours ago
The diagram was created with a very nice tool, but that is not TikZ (as far as I can see). Anyway, it is always possible to create the diagram using TikZ.
– JouleV
2 hours ago
Any other tools that you think could be useful? I'm definitely willing to try out other tools than TikZ if need be!
– Oskar Henriksson
1 hour ago
Any other tools that you think could be useful? I'm definitely willing to try out other tools than TikZ if need be!
– Oskar Henriksson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
We clearly can't avoid difficulties and complexity when dealing with such a complicated graph when using any kinds of tool, but by using matrices it has saved a lot of work.
documentclass[tikz]standalone
usetikzlibrarymatrix,positioning,arrows.meta
usepackagemathptmx
tikzsettoarrow/.style=[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],
backarrow/.style=<[scale=0.7]-[scale=0.7]
begindocument
begintikzpicture
matrix[matrix of math nodes,row sep=2cm,column sep=2cm] (m) %
A & B & C & D & E\
A' & B' & C' & D' & E'\;
path (m-1-2) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b) $b$
(m-1-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c) $c$
(m-1-4) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d) $d$
(m-1-5) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e) $e$
(m-2-2) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b2) $b'$
(m-2-3) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c2) $c'$
(m-2-4) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d2) $d'$
(m-2-5) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e2) $0$
(m-2-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c3) $c''$
(c) node[above left=1.5ex and -1.5ex] (cp) $overlinec+c$
(c2) node[below=1.5ex] (cm) $c'-c''$
(d2) node[below=1.5ex] (db) $0$
(e.base east) node[above right=-.3333em and -1ex] $=0$
(c.base west) node[above left=-.3333em and 1.5ex] (co) $overlinec$;
% Delete the following part to see what happens
foreach i [count=j from 2] in 1,2,3,4
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-2-i);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-1-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-2-i) -- (m-2-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-5) -- (m-2-5);
draw[toarrow] (b) edge[bend right] (b2) edge[bend left] (co);
draw[toarrow] (b2) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cm) to[bend right] (db);
draw[toarrow] (co) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cp) to[bend right] (c2);
draw[toarrow] (c) edge[bend right] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (d2) edge[bend left] (c2) edge[bend right=20] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (e2) edge[bend left] (d2) edge[bend left] (e);
draw[toarrow] (d) edge[bend left] (e);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484877%2ftypsetting-diagram-chases-with-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We clearly can't avoid difficulties and complexity when dealing with such a complicated graph when using any kinds of tool, but by using matrices it has saved a lot of work.
documentclass[tikz]standalone
usetikzlibrarymatrix,positioning,arrows.meta
usepackagemathptmx
tikzsettoarrow/.style=[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],
backarrow/.style=<[scale=0.7]-[scale=0.7]
begindocument
begintikzpicture
matrix[matrix of math nodes,row sep=2cm,column sep=2cm] (m) %
A & B & C & D & E\
A' & B' & C' & D' & E'\;
path (m-1-2) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b) $b$
(m-1-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c) $c$
(m-1-4) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d) $d$
(m-1-5) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e) $e$
(m-2-2) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b2) $b'$
(m-2-3) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c2) $c'$
(m-2-4) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d2) $d'$
(m-2-5) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e2) $0$
(m-2-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c3) $c''$
(c) node[above left=1.5ex and -1.5ex] (cp) $overlinec+c$
(c2) node[below=1.5ex] (cm) $c'-c''$
(d2) node[below=1.5ex] (db) $0$
(e.base east) node[above right=-.3333em and -1ex] $=0$
(c.base west) node[above left=-.3333em and 1.5ex] (co) $overlinec$;
% Delete the following part to see what happens
foreach i [count=j from 2] in 1,2,3,4
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-2-i);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-1-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-2-i) -- (m-2-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-5) -- (m-2-5);
draw[toarrow] (b) edge[bend right] (b2) edge[bend left] (co);
draw[toarrow] (b2) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cm) to[bend right] (db);
draw[toarrow] (co) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cp) to[bend right] (c2);
draw[toarrow] (c) edge[bend right] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (d2) edge[bend left] (c2) edge[bend right=20] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (e2) edge[bend left] (d2) edge[bend left] (e);
draw[toarrow] (d) edge[bend left] (e);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
We clearly can't avoid difficulties and complexity when dealing with such a complicated graph when using any kinds of tool, but by using matrices it has saved a lot of work.
documentclass[tikz]standalone
usetikzlibrarymatrix,positioning,arrows.meta
usepackagemathptmx
tikzsettoarrow/.style=[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],
backarrow/.style=<[scale=0.7]-[scale=0.7]
begindocument
begintikzpicture
matrix[matrix of math nodes,row sep=2cm,column sep=2cm] (m) %
A & B & C & D & E\
A' & B' & C' & D' & E'\;
path (m-1-2) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b) $b$
(m-1-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c) $c$
(m-1-4) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d) $d$
(m-1-5) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e) $e$
(m-2-2) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b2) $b'$
(m-2-3) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c2) $c'$
(m-2-4) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d2) $d'$
(m-2-5) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e2) $0$
(m-2-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c3) $c''$
(c) node[above left=1.5ex and -1.5ex] (cp) $overlinec+c$
(c2) node[below=1.5ex] (cm) $c'-c''$
(d2) node[below=1.5ex] (db) $0$
(e.base east) node[above right=-.3333em and -1ex] $=0$
(c.base west) node[above left=-.3333em and 1.5ex] (co) $overlinec$;
% Delete the following part to see what happens
foreach i [count=j from 2] in 1,2,3,4
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-2-i);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-1-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-2-i) -- (m-2-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-5) -- (m-2-5);
draw[toarrow] (b) edge[bend right] (b2) edge[bend left] (co);
draw[toarrow] (b2) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cm) to[bend right] (db);
draw[toarrow] (co) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cp) to[bend right] (c2);
draw[toarrow] (c) edge[bend right] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (d2) edge[bend left] (c2) edge[bend right=20] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (e2) edge[bend left] (d2) edge[bend left] (e);
draw[toarrow] (d) edge[bend left] (e);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
We clearly can't avoid difficulties and complexity when dealing with such a complicated graph when using any kinds of tool, but by using matrices it has saved a lot of work.
documentclass[tikz]standalone
usetikzlibrarymatrix,positioning,arrows.meta
usepackagemathptmx
tikzsettoarrow/.style=[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],
backarrow/.style=<[scale=0.7]-[scale=0.7]
begindocument
begintikzpicture
matrix[matrix of math nodes,row sep=2cm,column sep=2cm] (m) %
A & B & C & D & E\
A' & B' & C' & D' & E'\;
path (m-1-2) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b) $b$
(m-1-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c) $c$
(m-1-4) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d) $d$
(m-1-5) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e) $e$
(m-2-2) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b2) $b'$
(m-2-3) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c2) $c'$
(m-2-4) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d2) $d'$
(m-2-5) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e2) $0$
(m-2-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c3) $c''$
(c) node[above left=1.5ex and -1.5ex] (cp) $overlinec+c$
(c2) node[below=1.5ex] (cm) $c'-c''$
(d2) node[below=1.5ex] (db) $0$
(e.base east) node[above right=-.3333em and -1ex] $=0$
(c.base west) node[above left=-.3333em and 1.5ex] (co) $overlinec$;
% Delete the following part to see what happens
foreach i [count=j from 2] in 1,2,3,4
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-2-i);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-1-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-2-i) -- (m-2-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-5) -- (m-2-5);
draw[toarrow] (b) edge[bend right] (b2) edge[bend left] (co);
draw[toarrow] (b2) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cm) to[bend right] (db);
draw[toarrow] (co) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cp) to[bend right] (c2);
draw[toarrow] (c) edge[bend right] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (d2) edge[bend left] (c2) edge[bend right=20] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (e2) edge[bend left] (d2) edge[bend left] (e);
draw[toarrow] (d) edge[bend left] (e);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
We clearly can't avoid difficulties and complexity when dealing with such a complicated graph when using any kinds of tool, but by using matrices it has saved a lot of work.
documentclass[tikz]standalone
usetikzlibrarymatrix,positioning,arrows.meta
usepackagemathptmx
tikzsettoarrow/.style=[scale=0.7]->[scale=0.7],
backarrow/.style=<[scale=0.7]-[scale=0.7]
begindocument
begintikzpicture
matrix[matrix of math nodes,row sep=2cm,column sep=2cm] (m) %
A & B & C & D & E\
A' & B' & C' & D' & E'\;
path (m-1-2) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b) $b$
(m-1-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c) $c$
(m-1-4) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d) $d$
(m-1-5) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e) $e$
(m-2-2) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (b2) $b'$
(m-2-3) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c2) $c'$
(m-2-4) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (d2) $d'$
(m-2-5) node[below left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (e2) $0$
(m-2-3) node[above left=1.5ex and 1.5ex] (c3) $c''$
(c) node[above left=1.5ex and -1.5ex] (cp) $overlinec+c$
(c2) node[below=1.5ex] (cm) $c'-c''$
(d2) node[below=1.5ex] (db) $0$
(e.base east) node[above right=-.3333em and -1ex] $=0$
(c.base west) node[above left=-.3333em and 1.5ex] (co) $overlinec$;
% Delete the following part to see what happens
foreach i [count=j from 2] in 1,2,3,4
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-2-i);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-i) -- (m-1-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-2-i) -- (m-2-j);
draw[dotted,->] (m-1-5) -- (m-2-5);
draw[toarrow] (b) edge[bend right] (b2) edge[bend left] (co);
draw[toarrow] (b2) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cm) to[bend right] (db);
draw[toarrow] (co) to[bend right] (cm);
draw[toarrow] (cp) to[bend right] (c2);
draw[toarrow] (c) edge[bend right] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (d2) edge[bend left] (c2) edge[bend right=20] (c3) edge[bend left] (d);
draw[backarrow] (e2) edge[bend left] (d2) edge[bend left] (e);
draw[toarrow] (d) edge[bend left] (e);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
JouleVJouleV
13.5k22664
13.5k22664
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484877%2ftypsetting-diagram-chases-with-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The diagram was created with a very nice tool, but that is not TikZ (as far as I can see). Anyway, it is always possible to create the diagram using TikZ.
– JouleV
2 hours ago
Any other tools that you think could be useful? I'm definitely willing to try out other tools than TikZ if need be!
– Oskar Henriksson
1 hour ago