Do generators produce a fixed load?Do generators run slower if the load is lower?Are there reversed rotation direction in generators (as back EMF in MOTORS)?How do generators in space transmit/ deposit energy back to Earth?
Electric guitar: why such heavy pots?
How do I write a simple if-elseif protocol in Latex?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
How to replace the "space symbol" (squat-u) in listings?
Single Colour Mastermind Problem
Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?
When India mathematicians did know Euclid's Elements?
Inner for loop when run in background in bash spawns new bash process
Can fracking help reduce CO2?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Where does the labelling of extrinsic semiconductors as "n" and "p" come from?
Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?
Normal subgroup of even order whose nontrivial elements form a single conjugacy class is abelian
You look catfish vs You look like a catfish
TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?
Stateful vs non-stateful app
Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Can solid acids and bases have pH values? If not, how are they classified as acids or bases?
Modify locally tikzset
What word means to make something obsolete?
Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control?
Do generators produce a fixed load?
Do generators run slower if the load is lower?Are there reversed rotation direction in generators (as back EMF in MOTORS)?How do generators in space transmit/ deposit energy back to Earth?
$begingroup$
As an example of my question, imagine I have a small generator attached to a bicycle pedals. If this generator is connected to one light bulb, how would it compare with the generator being connected to multiple bulbs?
My assumption is that, as you add more bulbs, either;
- The resistance on the pedals would remain the same, but you would now have to pedal faster in order to light the bulbs to the same brightness, or;
- It would become harder to pedal when the extra bulbs are added, but the same rpm would be needed to produce the same brightness.
Which (if either) of my assumptions is the correct one?
generator
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an example of my question, imagine I have a small generator attached to a bicycle pedals. If this generator is connected to one light bulb, how would it compare with the generator being connected to multiple bulbs?
My assumption is that, as you add more bulbs, either;
- The resistance on the pedals would remain the same, but you would now have to pedal faster in order to light the bulbs to the same brightness, or;
- It would become harder to pedal when the extra bulbs are added, but the same rpm would be needed to produce the same brightness.
Which (if either) of my assumptions is the correct one?
generator
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an example of my question, imagine I have a small generator attached to a bicycle pedals. If this generator is connected to one light bulb, how would it compare with the generator being connected to multiple bulbs?
My assumption is that, as you add more bulbs, either;
- The resistance on the pedals would remain the same, but you would now have to pedal faster in order to light the bulbs to the same brightness, or;
- It would become harder to pedal when the extra bulbs are added, but the same rpm would be needed to produce the same brightness.
Which (if either) of my assumptions is the correct one?
generator
$endgroup$
As an example of my question, imagine I have a small generator attached to a bicycle pedals. If this generator is connected to one light bulb, how would it compare with the generator being connected to multiple bulbs?
My assumption is that, as you add more bulbs, either;
- The resistance on the pedals would remain the same, but you would now have to pedal faster in order to light the bulbs to the same brightness, or;
- It would become harder to pedal when the extra bulbs are added, but the same rpm would be needed to produce the same brightness.
Which (if either) of my assumptions is the correct one?
generator
generator
asked 2 hours ago
PhysicsGuy123PhysicsGuy123
304
304
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As you add bulbs in parallel, the load impedance drops and to light all the bulbs you have to pedal harder. When the load impedance becomes less than the output impedance of the generator, then more work is expended in heating the generator coils than in lighting the bulbs. In the limit of near-zero load impedance (short circuit), all the pedal work is lost as I^2 x R losses in the generator windings. The pedal effort then does not change.
If you add bulbs in series, then to light all the bulbs you again have to pedal harder. However, in this case the load impedance grows bigger and less current is allowed to flow through the load. The pedal effort declines and the bulb string grows dimmer. In the limit of infinite load impedance, the current goes to zero and the pedal effort goes to zero too.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "595"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28129%2fdo-generators-produce-a-fixed-load%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As you add bulbs in parallel, the load impedance drops and to light all the bulbs you have to pedal harder. When the load impedance becomes less than the output impedance of the generator, then more work is expended in heating the generator coils than in lighting the bulbs. In the limit of near-zero load impedance (short circuit), all the pedal work is lost as I^2 x R losses in the generator windings. The pedal effort then does not change.
If you add bulbs in series, then to light all the bulbs you again have to pedal harder. However, in this case the load impedance grows bigger and less current is allowed to flow through the load. The pedal effort declines and the bulb string grows dimmer. In the limit of infinite load impedance, the current goes to zero and the pedal effort goes to zero too.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you add bulbs in parallel, the load impedance drops and to light all the bulbs you have to pedal harder. When the load impedance becomes less than the output impedance of the generator, then more work is expended in heating the generator coils than in lighting the bulbs. In the limit of near-zero load impedance (short circuit), all the pedal work is lost as I^2 x R losses in the generator windings. The pedal effort then does not change.
If you add bulbs in series, then to light all the bulbs you again have to pedal harder. However, in this case the load impedance grows bigger and less current is allowed to flow through the load. The pedal effort declines and the bulb string grows dimmer. In the limit of infinite load impedance, the current goes to zero and the pedal effort goes to zero too.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you add bulbs in parallel, the load impedance drops and to light all the bulbs you have to pedal harder. When the load impedance becomes less than the output impedance of the generator, then more work is expended in heating the generator coils than in lighting the bulbs. In the limit of near-zero load impedance (short circuit), all the pedal work is lost as I^2 x R losses in the generator windings. The pedal effort then does not change.
If you add bulbs in series, then to light all the bulbs you again have to pedal harder. However, in this case the load impedance grows bigger and less current is allowed to flow through the load. The pedal effort declines and the bulb string grows dimmer. In the limit of infinite load impedance, the current goes to zero and the pedal effort goes to zero too.
$endgroup$
As you add bulbs in parallel, the load impedance drops and to light all the bulbs you have to pedal harder. When the load impedance becomes less than the output impedance of the generator, then more work is expended in heating the generator coils than in lighting the bulbs. In the limit of near-zero load impedance (short circuit), all the pedal work is lost as I^2 x R losses in the generator windings. The pedal effort then does not change.
If you add bulbs in series, then to light all the bulbs you again have to pedal harder. However, in this case the load impedance grows bigger and less current is allowed to flow through the load. The pedal effort declines and the bulb string grows dimmer. In the limit of infinite load impedance, the current goes to zero and the pedal effort goes to zero too.
answered 1 hour ago
niels nielsenniels nielsen
3,6251211
3,6251211
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. So, if instead of bulbs you had a motor how would this work? If you turned the motor off, I guess the mechanical resistance of the generator would be close to 0? And if you turned the motor up to its highest power, I guess it would require you to pedal much harder?
$endgroup$
– PhysicsGuy123
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
that's basically correct- but there are other details worth mentioning which I can't right at the moment- Niels
$endgroup$
– niels nielsen
52 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28129%2fdo-generators-produce-a-fixed-load%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown