When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?Why become a journal editor?How and why did the top journals become top journals?When did it become commonplace for data set providers to ask users to cite their paper(s)?Is this a tired phrase? — journal article titles that start with “Towards a theory of…”When and why did conferences pick up the habit of giving out conference bags to attendees?What is the point in publishing a paper in a journal rather than arXiv?When and how did journal publications start to have such an important role in evaluating researchers?From a historical perspective, when did impact factors become so important?What to do when journal comments to rewrite the article?Why did journal subscription prices increase by 25% between 2013 and 2017? (vs. 5% for US inflation)

Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?

Why are the 2nd/3rd singular forms of present of « potere » irregular?

Upright [...] in italics quotation

Will a top journal at least read my introduction?

Electric guitar: why such heavy pots?

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

Why is the origin of “threshold” uncertain?

What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `ab,cd` (braces)?

Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?

Was it really necessary for the Lunar Module to have 2 stages?

Confusion about capacitors

What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?

Single Colour Mastermind Problem

Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?

How deep to place a deadman anchor for a slackline?

In gnome-terminal only 2 out of 3 zoom keys work

Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?

How to verbalise code in Mathematica?

How to back up a running remote server?

Reverse the word in a string with the same order in javascript

Counterexample: a pair of linearly ordered sets that are isomorphic to subsets of the other, but not isomorphic between them

Normal subgroup of even order whose nontrivial elements form a single conjugacy class is abelian



When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?


Why become a journal editor?How and why did the top journals become top journals?When did it become commonplace for data set providers to ask users to cite their paper(s)?Is this a tired phrase? — journal article titles that start with “Towards a theory of…”When and why did conferences pick up the habit of giving out conference bags to attendees?What is the point in publishing a paper in a journal rather than arXiv?When and how did journal publications start to have such an important role in evaluating researchers?From a historical perspective, when did impact factors become so important?What to do when journal comments to rewrite the article?Why did journal subscription prices increase by 25% between 2013 and 2017? (vs. 5% for US inflation)













3















In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]



Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]



I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.



Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?



[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf



[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.

    – Nate Eldredge
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.

    – henning
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.

    – Federico Poloni
    2 hours ago
















3















In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]



Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]



I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.



Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?



[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf



[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.

    – Nate Eldredge
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.

    – henning
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.

    – Federico Poloni
    2 hours ago














3












3








3








In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]



Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]



I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.



Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?



[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf



[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]



Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]



I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.



Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?



[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf



[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986







journals academic-history






share|improve this question







New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









user7610user7610

1195




1195




New contributor




user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user7610 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3





    Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.

    – Nate Eldredge
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.

    – henning
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.

    – Federico Poloni
    2 hours ago













  • 3





    Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.

    – Nate Eldredge
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    @user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.

    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.

    – henning
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.

    – Federico Poloni
    2 hours ago








3




3





Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.

– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago





Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.

– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago




2




2





@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.

– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago





@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.

– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago




1




1





MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.

– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago





MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.

– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago




1




1





Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.

– henning
2 hours ago





Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.

– henning
2 hours ago




1




1





Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.

– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago






Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.

– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.



However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:




Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).




The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how




Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.




Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes




While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.




Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.



Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 1Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 2




I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.






share|improve this answer






























    3














    I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.



    Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.






    share|improve this answer























    • Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

      – user7610
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129814%2fwhen-and-why-did-journal-article-titles-become-descriptive-rather-than-creative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.



    However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:




    Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
    1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).




    The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how




    Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.




    Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes




    While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.




    Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.



    Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 1Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 2




    I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.






    share|improve this answer



























      7














      There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.



      However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:




      Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
      1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).




      The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how




      Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.




      Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes




      While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.




      Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.



      Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 1Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 2




      I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.






      share|improve this answer

























        7












        7








        7







        There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.



        However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:




        Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
        1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).




        The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how




        Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.




        Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes




        While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.




        Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.



        Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 1Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 2




        I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.






        share|improve this answer













        There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.



        However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:




        Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
        1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).




        The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how




        Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.




        Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes




        While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.




        Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.



        Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 1Tocatlian (1970) Fig. 2




        I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        AnyonAnyon

        8,95523345




        8,95523345





















            3














            I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.



            Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.






            share|improve this answer























            • Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

              – user7610
              1 hour ago















            3














            I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.



            Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.






            share|improve this answer























            • Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

              – user7610
              1 hour ago













            3












            3








            3







            I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.



            Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.






            share|improve this answer













            I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.



            Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge

            109k36314412




            109k36314412












            • Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

              – user7610
              1 hour ago

















            • Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

              – user7610
              1 hour ago
















            Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

            – user7610
            1 hour ago





            Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.

            – user7610
            1 hour ago










            user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129814%2fwhen-and-why-did-journal-article-titles-become-descriptive-rather-than-creative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

            Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп

            ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result