When did F become S in typeography, and why? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Were does Tifinagh come from?When and how did English become the Lingua Franca?Why did English become Lingua Franca of the modern world?When did English become a major subject in Japanese schools?When and how (why) did the idea that gender is not biological startWhen did French become the official language of France?When did Ireland become majority English-speakingOrigin of “It won't be done by next Tuesday”When did the British gentry stop wearing wigs?What is the earliest example of the usage of 'Nazis' to refer clearly and exclusively to the National-Socialists?

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Would it be possible to rearrange a dragon's flight muscle to somewhat circumvent the square-cube law?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Derivation tree not rendering

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

How to grep and cut numbers from a file and sum them

How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?

Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem

What's the point in a preamp?

Match Roman Numerals

Can the DM override racial traits?

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

Make it rain characters

Difference between "generating set" and free product?

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Hopping to infinity along a string of digits



When did F become S in typeography, and why?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Were does Tifinagh come from?When and how did English become the Lingua Franca?Why did English become Lingua Franca of the modern world?When did English become a major subject in Japanese schools?When and how (why) did the idea that gender is not biological startWhen did French become the official language of France?When did Ireland become majority English-speakingOrigin of “It won't be done by next Tuesday”When did the British gentry stop wearing wigs?What is the earliest example of the usage of 'Nazis' to refer clearly and exclusively to the National-Socialists?










3















I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."enter image description here



What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?










share|improve this question
























  • it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß

    – Agent_L
    5 hours ago















3















I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."enter image description here



What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?










share|improve this question
























  • it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß

    – Agent_L
    5 hours ago













3












3








3








I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."enter image description here



What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?










share|improve this question
















I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."enter image description here



What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?







18th-century language






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Ian Kemp

1033




1033










asked yesterday









Ryan_LRyan_L

26626




26626












  • it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß

    – Agent_L
    5 hours ago

















  • it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß

    – Agent_L
    5 hours ago
















it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß

– Agent_L
5 hours ago





it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß

– Agent_L
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















23














There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.



The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.




In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.




See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.



Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:



  • Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents

  • How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

    – TonyK
    14 hours ago












  • I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

    – sgf
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    13 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52097%2fwhen-did-f-become-s-in-typeography-and-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









23














There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.



The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.




In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.




See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.



Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:



  • Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents

  • How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

    – TonyK
    14 hours ago












  • I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

    – sgf
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    13 hours ago















23














There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.



The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.




In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.




See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.



Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:



  • Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents

  • How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

    – TonyK
    14 hours ago












  • I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

    – sgf
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    13 hours ago













23












23








23







There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.



The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.




In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.




See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.



Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:



  • Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents

  • How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?





share|improve this answer















There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.



The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the Wikipedia article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.




In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.




See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.



Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:



  • Use of “f” instead of “s” in historic, printed English documents

  • How exactly was the long S used and why did people stop using it?






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 mins ago









Laurel

3228




3228










answered yesterday









Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555




14.2k24555







  • 6





    This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

    – TonyK
    14 hours ago












  • I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

    – sgf
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    13 hours ago












  • 6





    This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

    – TonyK
    14 hours ago












  • I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

    – sgf
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    13 hours ago







6




6





This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

– TonyK
14 hours ago






This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.

– TonyK
14 hours ago














I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

– sgf
14 hours ago





I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.

– sgf
14 hours ago




1




1





@TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

– Denis de Bernardy
13 hours ago





@TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.

– Denis de Bernardy
13 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52097%2fwhen-did-f-become-s-in-typeography-and-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery