In calculating policy gradients, wouldn't longer trajectories have more weight according to formula?Why do we normalize the discounted rewards when doing policy gradient reinforcement learning?Why are policy gradients on-policy?Policy Gradients vs Value function, when implemented via DQNConvergence of vanilla or natural policy gradients (e.g. REINFORCE)How an action gets selected in a Policy Gradient Method?Time horizon T in policy gradients (actor-critic)Policy Gradient Methods - ScoreFunction & Log(policy)Policy Gradients - gradient Log probabilities favor less likely actions?Stability of value function approximation in policy gradientsUnderstanding policy gradient theorem - What does it mean to take gradients of reward wrt policy parameters?

Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in

Did Nintendo change its mind about 68000 SNES?

Why do I have a large white artefact on the rendered image?

When did hardware antialiasing start being available?

Would this string work as string?

What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?

PTIJ: At the Passover Seder, is one allowed to speak more than once during Maggid?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?

Why I don't get the wanted width of tcbox?

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

Does fire aspect on a sword, destroy mob drops?

Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?

Output visual diagram of picture

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Why does Surtur say that Thor is Asgard's doom?

Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?

Nested Dynamic SOQL Query

The English Debate

Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?

What kind of footwear is suitable for walking in micro gravity environment?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Hot air balloons as primitive bombers

Symbolism of 18 Journeyers



In calculating policy gradients, wouldn't longer trajectories have more weight according to formula?


Why do we normalize the discounted rewards when doing policy gradient reinforcement learning?Why are policy gradients on-policy?Policy Gradients vs Value function, when implemented via DQNConvergence of vanilla or natural policy gradients (e.g. REINFORCE)How an action gets selected in a Policy Gradient Method?Time horizon T in policy gradients (actor-critic)Policy Gradient Methods - ScoreFunction & Log(policy)Policy Gradients - gradient Log probabilities favor less likely actions?Stability of value function approximation in policy gradientsUnderstanding policy gradient theorem - What does it mean to take gradients of reward wrt policy parameters?













0












$begingroup$


In Sergey Levine's lecture on policy gradients (berkeley deep rl course), he show that policy gradient can be evaluated according to the formula
policy gradient formula



In this formula, wouldn't longer trajectories get more weight (in finite horizon situations), since the middle term, the sum over log pi, would involve more terms? (Why would it work like that?)



The specific example I have in mind is pacman, longer trajectories would contribute more to the gradient. Should it work like that?









share









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    In Sergey Levine's lecture on policy gradients (berkeley deep rl course), he show that policy gradient can be evaluated according to the formula
    policy gradient formula



    In this formula, wouldn't longer trajectories get more weight (in finite horizon situations), since the middle term, the sum over log pi, would involve more terms? (Why would it work like that?)



    The specific example I have in mind is pacman, longer trajectories would contribute more to the gradient. Should it work like that?









    share









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      In Sergey Levine's lecture on policy gradients (berkeley deep rl course), he show that policy gradient can be evaluated according to the formula
      policy gradient formula



      In this formula, wouldn't longer trajectories get more weight (in finite horizon situations), since the middle term, the sum over log pi, would involve more terms? (Why would it work like that?)



      The specific example I have in mind is pacman, longer trajectories would contribute more to the gradient. Should it work like that?









      share









      $endgroup$




      In Sergey Levine's lecture on policy gradients (berkeley deep rl course), he show that policy gradient can be evaluated according to the formula
      policy gradient formula



      In this formula, wouldn't longer trajectories get more weight (in finite horizon situations), since the middle term, the sum over log pi, would involve more terms? (Why would it work like that?)



      The specific example I have in mind is pacman, longer trajectories would contribute more to the gradient. Should it work like that?







      reinforcement-learning policy-gradients





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 4 mins ago









      liyuanliyuan

      133




      133




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47577%2fin-calculating-policy-gradients-wouldnt-longer-trajectories-have-more-weight-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47577%2fin-calculating-policy-gradients-wouldnt-longer-trajectories-have-more-weight-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

          Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

          Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery