Is there always a complete, orthogonal set of unitary matrices? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhen can a partial isometry $u$ in $mathcal B(H otimes K)$ be extended to a unitary in $1 otimes mathcal B(K)$?Cauchy-like inequality for Kronecker (tensor) productRecovering a linear map from a non-linear approximationHow to use Galerkin method to obtain existence with spaces $V subset H$ not compactly embeddedA linear combination problemAre Hilbert-Schmidt operators on separable Hilbert spaces “Hilbert Schmidt” on the space of Hilbert Schmidt Operators?Orthogonality of positive (semi-)definite matricesConditions on a $ntimes n$ Hermitian matrix such that its extremal eigenvectors have equal magnitude entriesIs the linear span of special orthogonal matrices equal to the whole space of $Ntimes N$ matrices?Existence of orthogonal basis of symmetric $ntimes n$ matrices, where each matrix is unitary?

Is there always a complete, orthogonal set of unitary matrices?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhen can a partial isometry $u$ in $mathcal B(H otimes K)$ be extended to a unitary in $1 otimes mathcal B(K)$?Cauchy-like inequality for Kronecker (tensor) productRecovering a linear map from a non-linear approximationHow to use Galerkin method to obtain existence with spaces $V subset H$ not compactly embeddedA linear combination problemAre Hilbert-Schmidt operators on separable Hilbert spaces “Hilbert Schmidt” on the space of Hilbert Schmidt Operators?Orthogonality of positive (semi-)definite matricesConditions on a $ntimes n$ Hermitian matrix such that its extremal eigenvectors have equal magnitude entriesIs the linear span of special orthogonal matrices equal to the whole space of $Ntimes N$ matrices?Existence of orthogonal basis of symmetric $ntimes n$ matrices, where each matrix is unitary?










1












$begingroup$


The set of size-$n$ unitary matrices span $Bbb C^n times n$ (this can be proven nicely using polar decomposition). If we select a maximal linear subset of unitary matrices, then we have a basis of $Bbb C^n times n$ consisting of $n^2$ unitary matrices. My question is whether we can find a basis that satisfies the additional constraint of orthogonality. That is:




Does there exist a basis $mathcal B$ of $Bbb C^n times n$ such that every $P in mathcal B$ is unitary (that is, $P^*P = I$) and for all distinct $P,Q in mathcal B$, we have $langle P,Q rangle = 0$?




Here, $langle cdot , cdot rangle$ refers to the Frobenius (AKA Hilbert-Schmidt) inner product, namely $langle P, Q rangle = operatornametrace(PQ^*)$.



When $n = 2$, the Pauli matrices provide a convenient solution. That is, we can take
$$
mathcal B = I,sigma_1,sigma_2,sigma_3 subset Bbb C^2 times 2.
$$

We can use this to produce a solution whenever $n = 2^k$. In particular, if we define $sigma_0 = I$ for convenience, we can take
$$
mathcal B = sigma_m_1 otimes cdots otimes sigma_m_k : 0 leq m_j leq 3 subset Bbb C^2^k times 2^k.
$$

Could we come up with a basis for any other $n$? Could we do so for every $n$?




Some observations so far:



  • Without loss of generality, we can assume that $mathcal B$ contains the $n times n$ identity matrix $I$. If $I$ is an element of the basis, it follows that the remaining matrices form a basis for the subspace of all trace-$0$ matrices.

  • A commuting set of matrices spans at most an $n$-dimensional subset, so there must be elements of $mathcal B$ that fail to commute









share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I thought of this question while trying to answer this post on MSE
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be useful: reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Miscellaneous%20Math/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Biro
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    google on "unitary error basis"
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Godsil
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisGodsil Excellent, thanks for the tip!
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


The set of size-$n$ unitary matrices span $Bbb C^n times n$ (this can be proven nicely using polar decomposition). If we select a maximal linear subset of unitary matrices, then we have a basis of $Bbb C^n times n$ consisting of $n^2$ unitary matrices. My question is whether we can find a basis that satisfies the additional constraint of orthogonality. That is:




Does there exist a basis $mathcal B$ of $Bbb C^n times n$ such that every $P in mathcal B$ is unitary (that is, $P^*P = I$) and for all distinct $P,Q in mathcal B$, we have $langle P,Q rangle = 0$?




Here, $langle cdot , cdot rangle$ refers to the Frobenius (AKA Hilbert-Schmidt) inner product, namely $langle P, Q rangle = operatornametrace(PQ^*)$.



When $n = 2$, the Pauli matrices provide a convenient solution. That is, we can take
$$
mathcal B = I,sigma_1,sigma_2,sigma_3 subset Bbb C^2 times 2.
$$

We can use this to produce a solution whenever $n = 2^k$. In particular, if we define $sigma_0 = I$ for convenience, we can take
$$
mathcal B = sigma_m_1 otimes cdots otimes sigma_m_k : 0 leq m_j leq 3 subset Bbb C^2^k times 2^k.
$$

Could we come up with a basis for any other $n$? Could we do so for every $n$?




Some observations so far:



  • Without loss of generality, we can assume that $mathcal B$ contains the $n times n$ identity matrix $I$. If $I$ is an element of the basis, it follows that the remaining matrices form a basis for the subspace of all trace-$0$ matrices.

  • A commuting set of matrices spans at most an $n$-dimensional subset, so there must be elements of $mathcal B$ that fail to commute









share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I thought of this question while trying to answer this post on MSE
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be useful: reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Miscellaneous%20Math/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Biro
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    google on "unitary error basis"
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Godsil
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisGodsil Excellent, thanks for the tip!
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


The set of size-$n$ unitary matrices span $Bbb C^n times n$ (this can be proven nicely using polar decomposition). If we select a maximal linear subset of unitary matrices, then we have a basis of $Bbb C^n times n$ consisting of $n^2$ unitary matrices. My question is whether we can find a basis that satisfies the additional constraint of orthogonality. That is:




Does there exist a basis $mathcal B$ of $Bbb C^n times n$ such that every $P in mathcal B$ is unitary (that is, $P^*P = I$) and for all distinct $P,Q in mathcal B$, we have $langle P,Q rangle = 0$?




Here, $langle cdot , cdot rangle$ refers to the Frobenius (AKA Hilbert-Schmidt) inner product, namely $langle P, Q rangle = operatornametrace(PQ^*)$.



When $n = 2$, the Pauli matrices provide a convenient solution. That is, we can take
$$
mathcal B = I,sigma_1,sigma_2,sigma_3 subset Bbb C^2 times 2.
$$

We can use this to produce a solution whenever $n = 2^k$. In particular, if we define $sigma_0 = I$ for convenience, we can take
$$
mathcal B = sigma_m_1 otimes cdots otimes sigma_m_k : 0 leq m_j leq 3 subset Bbb C^2^k times 2^k.
$$

Could we come up with a basis for any other $n$? Could we do so for every $n$?




Some observations so far:



  • Without loss of generality, we can assume that $mathcal B$ contains the $n times n$ identity matrix $I$. If $I$ is an element of the basis, it follows that the remaining matrices form a basis for the subspace of all trace-$0$ matrices.

  • A commuting set of matrices spans at most an $n$-dimensional subset, so there must be elements of $mathcal B$ that fail to commute









share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The set of size-$n$ unitary matrices span $Bbb C^n times n$ (this can be proven nicely using polar decomposition). If we select a maximal linear subset of unitary matrices, then we have a basis of $Bbb C^n times n$ consisting of $n^2$ unitary matrices. My question is whether we can find a basis that satisfies the additional constraint of orthogonality. That is:




Does there exist a basis $mathcal B$ of $Bbb C^n times n$ such that every $P in mathcal B$ is unitary (that is, $P^*P = I$) and for all distinct $P,Q in mathcal B$, we have $langle P,Q rangle = 0$?




Here, $langle cdot , cdot rangle$ refers to the Frobenius (AKA Hilbert-Schmidt) inner product, namely $langle P, Q rangle = operatornametrace(PQ^*)$.



When $n = 2$, the Pauli matrices provide a convenient solution. That is, we can take
$$
mathcal B = I,sigma_1,sigma_2,sigma_3 subset Bbb C^2 times 2.
$$

We can use this to produce a solution whenever $n = 2^k$. In particular, if we define $sigma_0 = I$ for convenience, we can take
$$
mathcal B = sigma_m_1 otimes cdots otimes sigma_m_k : 0 leq m_j leq 3 subset Bbb C^2^k times 2^k.
$$

Could we come up with a basis for any other $n$? Could we do so for every $n$?




Some observations so far:



  • Without loss of generality, we can assume that $mathcal B$ contains the $n times n$ identity matrix $I$. If $I$ is an element of the basis, it follows that the remaining matrices form a basis for the subspace of all trace-$0$ matrices.

  • A commuting set of matrices spans at most an $n$-dimensional subset, so there must be elements of $mathcal B$ that fail to commute






fa.functional-analysis linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom

1306




1306











  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I thought of this question while trying to answer this post on MSE
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be useful: reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Miscellaneous%20Math/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Biro
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    google on "unitary error basis"
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Godsil
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisGodsil Excellent, thanks for the tip!
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I thought of this question while trying to answer this post on MSE
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be useful: reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Miscellaneous%20Math/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Biro
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    google on "unitary error basis"
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Godsil
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisGodsil Excellent, thanks for the tip!
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
For what it's worth, I thought of this question while trying to answer this post on MSE
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
For what it's worth, I thought of this question while trying to answer this post on MSE
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
This may be useful: reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Miscellaneous%20Math/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Biro
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
This may be useful: reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Miscellaneous%20Math/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Biro
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
google on "unitary error basis"
$endgroup$
– Chris Godsil
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
google on "unitary error basis"
$endgroup$
– Chris Godsil
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@ChrisGodsil Excellent, thanks for the tip!
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@ChrisGodsil Excellent, thanks for the tip!
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, consider the group of $n^2$ matrices generated by the shift $e_i mapsto e_i+1$ and the diagonal matrix with entries $(1,omega,omega^2,cdots,omega^n-1)$ where $omega$ is a primitive $n$th root of unit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Very elegant! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326767%2fis-there-always-a-complete-orthogonal-set-of-unitary-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Yes, consider the group of $n^2$ matrices generated by the shift $e_i mapsto e_i+1$ and the diagonal matrix with entries $(1,omega,omega^2,cdots,omega^n-1)$ where $omega$ is a primitive $n$th root of unit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Very elegant! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$

Yes, consider the group of $n^2$ matrices generated by the shift $e_i mapsto e_i+1$ and the diagonal matrix with entries $(1,omega,omega^2,cdots,omega^n-1)$ where $omega$ is a primitive $n$th root of unit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Very elegant! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Yes, consider the group of $n^2$ matrices generated by the shift $e_i mapsto e_i+1$ and the diagonal matrix with entries $(1,omega,omega^2,cdots,omega^n-1)$ where $omega$ is a primitive $n$th root of unit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, consider the group of $n^2$ matrices generated by the shift $e_i mapsto e_i+1$ and the diagonal matrix with entries $(1,omega,omega^2,cdots,omega^n-1)$ where $omega$ is a primitive $n$th root of unit.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Guillaume AubrunGuillaume Aubrun

1,9571424




1,9571424











  • $begingroup$
    Very elegant! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Very elegant! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Very elegant! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Very elegant! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
1 hour ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326767%2fis-there-always-a-complete-orthogonal-set-of-unitary-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery