Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?Why does Boeing name its aircraft B7x7 and Airbus names theirs A3x0?Why are modern regional jet designs shifting towards under wing engines?Why did the first Boeing B17 test flight crash on takeoff?Why does Boeing use two different door-types (B757 hinge vs. B767 slide)?What happened with the Boeing PETA Pulse Jet EnginesIs there a significant difference between the jet blast from Airbus and Boeing?What is the difference between a business jet and a regional jet?Why don't short-haul regional jets go for composites?Which was the last Boeing crash that didn't send its black boxes back to the US?Why did the Mercure fail?

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

How to install cross-compiler on Ubuntu 18.04?

Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Different meanings of こわい

Why are UK visa biometrics appointments suspended at USCIS Application Support Centers?

Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?

Is it "common practice in Fourier transform spectroscopy to multiply the measured interferogram by an apodizing function"? If so, why?

Finding the reason behind the value of the integral.

What are this "equations" on door's frames in Germany?

How could sorcerers who are able to produce/manipulate almost all forms of energy communicate over large distances?

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Pact of Blade Warlock with Dancing Blade

Placement of More Information/Help Icon button for Radio Buttons

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

Machine learning testing data

What is the opposite of "eschatology"?

In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?



Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?


Why does Boeing name its aircraft B7x7 and Airbus names theirs A3x0?Why are modern regional jet designs shifting towards under wing engines?Why did the first Boeing B17 test flight crash on takeoff?Why does Boeing use two different door-types (B757 hinge vs. B767 slide)?What happened with the Boeing PETA Pulse Jet EnginesIs there a significant difference between the jet blast from Airbus and Boeing?What is the difference between a business jet and a regional jet?Why don't short-haul regional jets go for composites?Which was the last Boeing crash that didn't send its black boxes back to the US?Why did the Mercure fail?













4












$begingroup$


Boeing, although it produced many larger narrowbodies, never designed its own regional jet; the only regional jet it ever produced was the DC-9 (from 1997 through 2006, in the DC-9-80 and DC-9-90 series), a (McDonnell) Douglas aircraft which Boeing inherited from Long Beach through a corporate merger.



Why didn't Boeing design and build its own regional jet earlier, to compete with the DC-9?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This is just a guess, but seeing as the first DC-9 was produced in 1965 and the first 737 was produced in 1966, it would be unlikely that Boeing would design a slightly smaller plane in parallel with the 737 and possibly compete with themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – selectstriker2
    3 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


Boeing, although it produced many larger narrowbodies, never designed its own regional jet; the only regional jet it ever produced was the DC-9 (from 1997 through 2006, in the DC-9-80 and DC-9-90 series), a (McDonnell) Douglas aircraft which Boeing inherited from Long Beach through a corporate merger.



Why didn't Boeing design and build its own regional jet earlier, to compete with the DC-9?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This is just a guess, but seeing as the first DC-9 was produced in 1965 and the first 737 was produced in 1966, it would be unlikely that Boeing would design a slightly smaller plane in parallel with the 737 and possibly compete with themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – selectstriker2
    3 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Boeing, although it produced many larger narrowbodies, never designed its own regional jet; the only regional jet it ever produced was the DC-9 (from 1997 through 2006, in the DC-9-80 and DC-9-90 series), a (McDonnell) Douglas aircraft which Boeing inherited from Long Beach through a corporate merger.



Why didn't Boeing design and build its own regional jet earlier, to compete with the DC-9?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Boeing, although it produced many larger narrowbodies, never designed its own regional jet; the only regional jet it ever produced was the DC-9 (from 1997 through 2006, in the DC-9-80 and DC-9-90 series), a (McDonnell) Douglas aircraft which Boeing inherited from Long Beach through a corporate merger.



Why didn't Boeing design and build its own regional jet earlier, to compete with the DC-9?







boeing regional-jet






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









SeanSean

5,55432667




5,55432667











  • $begingroup$
    This is just a guess, but seeing as the first DC-9 was produced in 1965 and the first 737 was produced in 1966, it would be unlikely that Boeing would design a slightly smaller plane in parallel with the 737 and possibly compete with themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – selectstriker2
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This is just a guess, but seeing as the first DC-9 was produced in 1965 and the first 737 was produced in 1966, it would be unlikely that Boeing would design a slightly smaller plane in parallel with the 737 and possibly compete with themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – selectstriker2
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
This is just a guess, but seeing as the first DC-9 was produced in 1965 and the first 737 was produced in 1966, it would be unlikely that Boeing would design a slightly smaller plane in parallel with the 737 and possibly compete with themselves.
$endgroup$
– selectstriker2
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is just a guess, but seeing as the first DC-9 was produced in 1965 and the first 737 was produced in 1966, it would be unlikely that Boeing would design a slightly smaller plane in parallel with the 737 and possibly compete with themselves.
$endgroup$
– selectstriker2
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

Boeing 727



Boeing did have a small regional jet called the Boeing 727. This plane was designed to operate at smaller airports, with independence from ground facilities as a selling feature. The best example is that the 727 had built-in stairs in the rear underbelly of the aircraft. This could be opened in flight until some hijacker known as DB Cooper jumped out to make his escape.



The 727-100C could have a combination of 54 passengers and four cargo pallets of freight or up to 94 passengers in a mixed class with no freight.



Until it ended production at 1,832 aircraft, the 727 was the most popular passenger jet ever sold. Since that time, the most popular plane ever sold was the Boeing 737, which could have as few as 85 passengers with the 737-100.



Boeing met a definite need for airlines since it sold so many aircraft. A better question might be what could McDonnell-Douglas have done to meet airline needs and still be a viable competitor.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
    $endgroup$
    – Shawn
    1 hour ago


















5












$begingroup$

Well it did have one in the form of the ‘slugs’ - the earlier 737 classic aircraft. They sold outrageously well along with the 727s to fill regional or national routes.



And let’s not forget the airline business was considerably different than it is today in the form of structure and operations so what we consider a ‘regional’ aircraft is very different to what it was back then.



It really wasn’t until the 1990s with deregulation in full force and changes to the labor structure of the airlines going over to the ‘hub and spoke’ approach to travel, which facilitated the rise of the regional carriers and the intro of the fast and efficient 50-60 passenger regional jets. I suspect back in the ‘golden age’ of air travel pre deregulation and oil embargo, when 747s were a status symbol and iconic of the glamour of jet setting, there just would not have been a market, an interest, or both, in a large enough setting to justify investing in a jet that small.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    The 737 is basically Boeing's regional jet, but ended up growing into something larger to meet customer demand.



    The DC-9 was introduced in 1965 and had variants seating from 90 to 135 in a single class.



    The 737 was introduced in 1968. Competition like the DC-9 was already taking over this market. The 737-100 was designed to seat 103-118 in a single class, right in the middle of the DC-9 market. But only 30 of these were built, mostly for Lufthansa. Customers wanted something larger, so the 737-200 was introduced, seating 115 to 130 in a single class. This covers the upper range of the DC-9 family, and over 1,000 of these were built, surpassing the DC-9. These variants were even powered by some of the same variants of the Pratt & Whitney JT8D that the DC-9 used.



    The 737-500 was the Classic version that was designed to replace the 737-200, and almost 400 of these were built. The 737-600 was the Next Generation version to replace the 737-500, but only 69 were built. The 737 had grown to optimally carry more passengers. Boeing produced what began as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95 under the Boeing 717 name, but production ended amid slow sales. When the market for this size of plane picked up again, Boeing decided not to compete with companies such as Bombardier and Embraer in the regional jet market, as that would probably require a completely new design.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "528"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61921%2fwhy-didnt-boeing-produce-its-own-regional-jet%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10












      $begingroup$

      Boeing 727



      Boeing did have a small regional jet called the Boeing 727. This plane was designed to operate at smaller airports, with independence from ground facilities as a selling feature. The best example is that the 727 had built-in stairs in the rear underbelly of the aircraft. This could be opened in flight until some hijacker known as DB Cooper jumped out to make his escape.



      The 727-100C could have a combination of 54 passengers and four cargo pallets of freight or up to 94 passengers in a mixed class with no freight.



      Until it ended production at 1,832 aircraft, the 727 was the most popular passenger jet ever sold. Since that time, the most popular plane ever sold was the Boeing 737, which could have as few as 85 passengers with the 737-100.



      Boeing met a definite need for airlines since it sold so many aircraft. A better question might be what could McDonnell-Douglas have done to meet airline needs and still be a viable competitor.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
        $endgroup$
        – Shawn
        1 hour ago















      10












      $begingroup$

      Boeing 727



      Boeing did have a small regional jet called the Boeing 727. This plane was designed to operate at smaller airports, with independence from ground facilities as a selling feature. The best example is that the 727 had built-in stairs in the rear underbelly of the aircraft. This could be opened in flight until some hijacker known as DB Cooper jumped out to make his escape.



      The 727-100C could have a combination of 54 passengers and four cargo pallets of freight or up to 94 passengers in a mixed class with no freight.



      Until it ended production at 1,832 aircraft, the 727 was the most popular passenger jet ever sold. Since that time, the most popular plane ever sold was the Boeing 737, which could have as few as 85 passengers with the 737-100.



      Boeing met a definite need for airlines since it sold so many aircraft. A better question might be what could McDonnell-Douglas have done to meet airline needs and still be a viable competitor.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
        $endgroup$
        – Shawn
        1 hour ago













      10












      10








      10





      $begingroup$

      Boeing 727



      Boeing did have a small regional jet called the Boeing 727. This plane was designed to operate at smaller airports, with independence from ground facilities as a selling feature. The best example is that the 727 had built-in stairs in the rear underbelly of the aircraft. This could be opened in flight until some hijacker known as DB Cooper jumped out to make his escape.



      The 727-100C could have a combination of 54 passengers and four cargo pallets of freight or up to 94 passengers in a mixed class with no freight.



      Until it ended production at 1,832 aircraft, the 727 was the most popular passenger jet ever sold. Since that time, the most popular plane ever sold was the Boeing 737, which could have as few as 85 passengers with the 737-100.



      Boeing met a definite need for airlines since it sold so many aircraft. A better question might be what could McDonnell-Douglas have done to meet airline needs and still be a viable competitor.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Boeing 727



      Boeing did have a small regional jet called the Boeing 727. This plane was designed to operate at smaller airports, with independence from ground facilities as a selling feature. The best example is that the 727 had built-in stairs in the rear underbelly of the aircraft. This could be opened in flight until some hijacker known as DB Cooper jumped out to make his escape.



      The 727-100C could have a combination of 54 passengers and four cargo pallets of freight or up to 94 passengers in a mixed class with no freight.



      Until it ended production at 1,832 aircraft, the 727 was the most popular passenger jet ever sold. Since that time, the most popular plane ever sold was the Boeing 737, which could have as few as 85 passengers with the 737-100.



      Boeing met a definite need for airlines since it sold so many aircraft. A better question might be what could McDonnell-Douglas have done to meet airline needs and still be a viable competitor.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 2 hours ago

























      answered 2 hours ago









      gwallygwally

      1,459514




      1,459514











      • $begingroup$
        After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
        $endgroup$
        – Shawn
        1 hour ago
















      • $begingroup$
        After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
        $endgroup$
        – Shawn
        1 hour ago















      $begingroup$
      After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
      $endgroup$
      – Shawn
      1 hour ago




      $begingroup$
      After outgrowing the Dassault Falcon, Federal Express built their business off of the domestically-operated B727. It was a great plane for what it was used for. But I would imagine that the technology that made smaller jet aircraft cheaper to operate than the existing turbo-prop regional carriers just wasn't quite advanced enough yet.
      $endgroup$
      – Shawn
      1 hour ago











      5












      $begingroup$

      Well it did have one in the form of the ‘slugs’ - the earlier 737 classic aircraft. They sold outrageously well along with the 727s to fill regional or national routes.



      And let’s not forget the airline business was considerably different than it is today in the form of structure and operations so what we consider a ‘regional’ aircraft is very different to what it was back then.



      It really wasn’t until the 1990s with deregulation in full force and changes to the labor structure of the airlines going over to the ‘hub and spoke’ approach to travel, which facilitated the rise of the regional carriers and the intro of the fast and efficient 50-60 passenger regional jets. I suspect back in the ‘golden age’ of air travel pre deregulation and oil embargo, when 747s were a status symbol and iconic of the glamour of jet setting, there just would not have been a market, an interest, or both, in a large enough setting to justify investing in a jet that small.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        5












        $begingroup$

        Well it did have one in the form of the ‘slugs’ - the earlier 737 classic aircraft. They sold outrageously well along with the 727s to fill regional or national routes.



        And let’s not forget the airline business was considerably different than it is today in the form of structure and operations so what we consider a ‘regional’ aircraft is very different to what it was back then.



        It really wasn’t until the 1990s with deregulation in full force and changes to the labor structure of the airlines going over to the ‘hub and spoke’ approach to travel, which facilitated the rise of the regional carriers and the intro of the fast and efficient 50-60 passenger regional jets. I suspect back in the ‘golden age’ of air travel pre deregulation and oil embargo, when 747s were a status symbol and iconic of the glamour of jet setting, there just would not have been a market, an interest, or both, in a large enough setting to justify investing in a jet that small.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Well it did have one in the form of the ‘slugs’ - the earlier 737 classic aircraft. They sold outrageously well along with the 727s to fill regional or national routes.



          And let’s not forget the airline business was considerably different than it is today in the form of structure and operations so what we consider a ‘regional’ aircraft is very different to what it was back then.



          It really wasn’t until the 1990s with deregulation in full force and changes to the labor structure of the airlines going over to the ‘hub and spoke’ approach to travel, which facilitated the rise of the regional carriers and the intro of the fast and efficient 50-60 passenger regional jets. I suspect back in the ‘golden age’ of air travel pre deregulation and oil embargo, when 747s were a status symbol and iconic of the glamour of jet setting, there just would not have been a market, an interest, or both, in a large enough setting to justify investing in a jet that small.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Well it did have one in the form of the ‘slugs’ - the earlier 737 classic aircraft. They sold outrageously well along with the 727s to fill regional or national routes.



          And let’s not forget the airline business was considerably different than it is today in the form of structure and operations so what we consider a ‘regional’ aircraft is very different to what it was back then.



          It really wasn’t until the 1990s with deregulation in full force and changes to the labor structure of the airlines going over to the ‘hub and spoke’ approach to travel, which facilitated the rise of the regional carriers and the intro of the fast and efficient 50-60 passenger regional jets. I suspect back in the ‘golden age’ of air travel pre deregulation and oil embargo, when 747s were a status symbol and iconic of the glamour of jet setting, there just would not have been a market, an interest, or both, in a large enough setting to justify investing in a jet that small.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Carlo FelicioneCarlo Felicione

          43.2k478155




          43.2k478155





















              1












              $begingroup$

              The 737 is basically Boeing's regional jet, but ended up growing into something larger to meet customer demand.



              The DC-9 was introduced in 1965 and had variants seating from 90 to 135 in a single class.



              The 737 was introduced in 1968. Competition like the DC-9 was already taking over this market. The 737-100 was designed to seat 103-118 in a single class, right in the middle of the DC-9 market. But only 30 of these were built, mostly for Lufthansa. Customers wanted something larger, so the 737-200 was introduced, seating 115 to 130 in a single class. This covers the upper range of the DC-9 family, and over 1,000 of these were built, surpassing the DC-9. These variants were even powered by some of the same variants of the Pratt & Whitney JT8D that the DC-9 used.



              The 737-500 was the Classic version that was designed to replace the 737-200, and almost 400 of these were built. The 737-600 was the Next Generation version to replace the 737-500, but only 69 were built. The 737 had grown to optimally carry more passengers. Boeing produced what began as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95 under the Boeing 717 name, but production ended amid slow sales. When the market for this size of plane picked up again, Boeing decided not to compete with companies such as Bombardier and Embraer in the regional jet market, as that would probably require a completely new design.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                The 737 is basically Boeing's regional jet, but ended up growing into something larger to meet customer demand.



                The DC-9 was introduced in 1965 and had variants seating from 90 to 135 in a single class.



                The 737 was introduced in 1968. Competition like the DC-9 was already taking over this market. The 737-100 was designed to seat 103-118 in a single class, right in the middle of the DC-9 market. But only 30 of these were built, mostly for Lufthansa. Customers wanted something larger, so the 737-200 was introduced, seating 115 to 130 in a single class. This covers the upper range of the DC-9 family, and over 1,000 of these were built, surpassing the DC-9. These variants were even powered by some of the same variants of the Pratt & Whitney JT8D that the DC-9 used.



                The 737-500 was the Classic version that was designed to replace the 737-200, and almost 400 of these were built. The 737-600 was the Next Generation version to replace the 737-500, but only 69 were built. The 737 had grown to optimally carry more passengers. Boeing produced what began as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95 under the Boeing 717 name, but production ended amid slow sales. When the market for this size of plane picked up again, Boeing decided not to compete with companies such as Bombardier and Embraer in the regional jet market, as that would probably require a completely new design.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  The 737 is basically Boeing's regional jet, but ended up growing into something larger to meet customer demand.



                  The DC-9 was introduced in 1965 and had variants seating from 90 to 135 in a single class.



                  The 737 was introduced in 1968. Competition like the DC-9 was already taking over this market. The 737-100 was designed to seat 103-118 in a single class, right in the middle of the DC-9 market. But only 30 of these were built, mostly for Lufthansa. Customers wanted something larger, so the 737-200 was introduced, seating 115 to 130 in a single class. This covers the upper range of the DC-9 family, and over 1,000 of these were built, surpassing the DC-9. These variants were even powered by some of the same variants of the Pratt & Whitney JT8D that the DC-9 used.



                  The 737-500 was the Classic version that was designed to replace the 737-200, and almost 400 of these were built. The 737-600 was the Next Generation version to replace the 737-500, but only 69 were built. The 737 had grown to optimally carry more passengers. Boeing produced what began as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95 under the Boeing 717 name, but production ended amid slow sales. When the market for this size of plane picked up again, Boeing decided not to compete with companies such as Bombardier and Embraer in the regional jet market, as that would probably require a completely new design.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The 737 is basically Boeing's regional jet, but ended up growing into something larger to meet customer demand.



                  The DC-9 was introduced in 1965 and had variants seating from 90 to 135 in a single class.



                  The 737 was introduced in 1968. Competition like the DC-9 was already taking over this market. The 737-100 was designed to seat 103-118 in a single class, right in the middle of the DC-9 market. But only 30 of these were built, mostly for Lufthansa. Customers wanted something larger, so the 737-200 was introduced, seating 115 to 130 in a single class. This covers the upper range of the DC-9 family, and over 1,000 of these were built, surpassing the DC-9. These variants were even powered by some of the same variants of the Pratt & Whitney JT8D that the DC-9 used.



                  The 737-500 was the Classic version that was designed to replace the 737-200, and almost 400 of these were built. The 737-600 was the Next Generation version to replace the 737-500, but only 69 were built. The 737 had grown to optimally carry more passengers. Boeing produced what began as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95 under the Boeing 717 name, but production ended amid slow sales. When the market for this size of plane picked up again, Boeing decided not to compete with companies such as Bombardier and Embraer in the regional jet market, as that would probably require a completely new design.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  foootfooot

                  54.1k17173324




                  54.1k17173324



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61921%2fwhy-didnt-boeing-produce-its-own-regional-jet%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown