Transfer learning no improvement in loss2019 Community Moderator ElectionTransfer learning: Poor performance with last layer replacedIs there any proven disadvantage of transfer learning for CNNs?Validation score (f1) remains the same when swapping labelsXor gate accuracy improvementValue error in Merging two different models in kerasValue of loss and accuracy does not change over EpochsTransfer learning - small databaseIN CIFAR 10 DATASETModel loss and validation loss not decreasing? How to speed?Why do I need pre-trained weights in transfer learning?

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Blending or harmonizing

Is this draw by repetition?

How to stretch the corners of this image so that it looks like a perfect rectangle?

Bullying boss launched a smear campaign and made me unemployable

Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

What historical events would have to change in order to make 19th century "steampunk" technology possible?

How to remove border from elements in the last row?

In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?

What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?

How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?

Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?

Is it possible to map the firing of neurons in the human brain so as to stimulate artificial memories in someone else?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

What exactly is ineptocracy?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?



Transfer learning no improvement in loss



2019 Community Moderator ElectionTransfer learning: Poor performance with last layer replacedIs there any proven disadvantage of transfer learning for CNNs?Validation score (f1) remains the same when swapping labelsXor gate accuracy improvementValue error in Merging two different models in kerasValue of loss and accuracy does not change over EpochsTransfer learning - small databaseIN CIFAR 10 DATASETModel loss and validation loss not decreasing? How to speed?Why do I need pre-trained weights in transfer learning?










0












$begingroup$


I am doing transfer learning on a pre-trained model with an own dataset.
I am loading the model like:



 train_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
train_data_dir,
target_size=(224, 224),
batch_size=32,
subset='training') # set as training data

validation_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
train_data_dir, # same directory as training data
target_size=(224, 224),
batch_size=32,
subset='validation') # set as validation data


model = ResNet50(include_top=False, weights=None, input_shape=(224,224,3))
model.load_weights("a trained model weights on 224x224")

model.layers.pop()

for layer in model.layers:
layer.trainable = False

x = model.layers[-1].output

x = Flatten(name='flatten')(x)
x = Dropout(0.2)(x)
x = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(x)
predictions = Dense(101, activation='softmax', name='pred_age')(x)

top_model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)

top_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy',
optimizer=adam,
metrics=[accuracy])

EPOCHS = 100
BATCH_SIZE = 32
STEPS_PER_EPOCH = 4424 // BATCH_SIZE
VALIDATION_STEPS = 466 // BATCH_SIZE

callbacks = [LearningRateScheduler(schedule=Schedule(EPOCHS, initial_lr=lr_rate)),
ModelCheckpoint(str(output_dir) + "/weights.epoch:03d-val_loss:.3f-val_age_mae:.3f.hdf5",
monitor="val_age_mae",
verbose=1,
save_best_only=False,
mode="min")
]

hist = top_model.fit_generator(generator=train_set,
epochs=EPOCHS,
steps_per_epoch = STEPS_PER_EPOCH,
validation_data=val_set,
validation_steps = VALIDATION_STEPS,
verbose=1,
callbacks=callbacks)



activation_49 (Activation) (None, 7, 7, 2048) 0 add_16[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
flatten (Flatten) (None, 100352) 0 activation_49[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
dense_1 (Dense) (None, 512) 51380736 flatten[0][0]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
pred_age (Dense) (None, 101) 51813 dense_1[0][0]
==================================================================================================
Total params: 75,020,261
Trainable params: 51,432,549
Non-trainable params: 23,587,712
__________________________________________________________________________________________________



Epoch 1/100
140/140 [==============================] - 1033s 7s/step - loss: 14.5776 - age_mae: 12.2994 - val_loss: 15.6144 - val_age_mae: 24.8527

Epoch 00001: val_age_mae improved from inf to 24.85268, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.001-15.614-24.853.hdf5
Epoch 2/100
140/140 [==============================] - 969s 7s/step - loss: 14.7104 - age_mae: 11.2545 - val_loss: 15.6462 - val_age_mae: 25.1104

Epoch 00002: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
Epoch 3/100
140/140 [==============================] - 769s 5s/step - loss: 14.6159 - age_mae: 13.5181 - val_loss: 15.7551 - val_age_mae: 29.4640

Epoch 00003: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
Epoch 4/100
140/140 [==============================] - 815s 6s/step - loss: 14.6509 - age_mae: 13.0087 - val_loss: 15.9366 - val_age_mae: 18.3581

Epoch 00004: val_age_mae improved from 24.85268 to 18.35811, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.004-15.937-18.358.hdf5
Epoch 5/100
140/140 [==============================] - 1059s 8s/step - loss: 14.3882 - age_mae: 11.8039 - val_loss: 15.6825 - val_age_mae: 24.6937

Epoch 00005: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811
Epoch 6/100
140/140 [==============================] - 1052s 8s/step - loss: 14.4496 - age_mae: 13.6652 - val_loss: 15.4278 - val_age_mae: 24.5045

Epoch 00006: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811



I already ruined this couple times, and after epoch 4 it is not improving anymore.



I get the following loss graph



loss graph result










share|improve this question









New contributor




TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am doing transfer learning on a pre-trained model with an own dataset.
    I am loading the model like:



     train_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
    train_data_dir,
    target_size=(224, 224),
    batch_size=32,
    subset='training') # set as training data

    validation_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
    train_data_dir, # same directory as training data
    target_size=(224, 224),
    batch_size=32,
    subset='validation') # set as validation data


    model = ResNet50(include_top=False, weights=None, input_shape=(224,224,3))
    model.load_weights("a trained model weights on 224x224")

    model.layers.pop()

    for layer in model.layers:
    layer.trainable = False

    x = model.layers[-1].output

    x = Flatten(name='flatten')(x)
    x = Dropout(0.2)(x)
    x = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(x)
    predictions = Dense(101, activation='softmax', name='pred_age')(x)

    top_model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)

    top_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy',
    optimizer=adam,
    metrics=[accuracy])

    EPOCHS = 100
    BATCH_SIZE = 32
    STEPS_PER_EPOCH = 4424 // BATCH_SIZE
    VALIDATION_STEPS = 466 // BATCH_SIZE

    callbacks = [LearningRateScheduler(schedule=Schedule(EPOCHS, initial_lr=lr_rate)),
    ModelCheckpoint(str(output_dir) + "/weights.epoch:03d-val_loss:.3f-val_age_mae:.3f.hdf5",
    monitor="val_age_mae",
    verbose=1,
    save_best_only=False,
    mode="min")
    ]

    hist = top_model.fit_generator(generator=train_set,
    epochs=EPOCHS,
    steps_per_epoch = STEPS_PER_EPOCH,
    validation_data=val_set,
    validation_steps = VALIDATION_STEPS,
    verbose=1,
    callbacks=callbacks)



    activation_49 (Activation) (None, 7, 7, 2048) 0 add_16[0][0]
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________
    flatten (Flatten) (None, 100352) 0 activation_49[0][0]
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________
    dense_1 (Dense) (None, 512) 51380736 flatten[0][0]
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________
    pred_age (Dense) (None, 101) 51813 dense_1[0][0]
    ==================================================================================================
    Total params: 75,020,261
    Trainable params: 51,432,549
    Non-trainable params: 23,587,712
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________



    Epoch 1/100
    140/140 [==============================] - 1033s 7s/step - loss: 14.5776 - age_mae: 12.2994 - val_loss: 15.6144 - val_age_mae: 24.8527

    Epoch 00001: val_age_mae improved from inf to 24.85268, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.001-15.614-24.853.hdf5
    Epoch 2/100
    140/140 [==============================] - 969s 7s/step - loss: 14.7104 - age_mae: 11.2545 - val_loss: 15.6462 - val_age_mae: 25.1104

    Epoch 00002: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
    Epoch 3/100
    140/140 [==============================] - 769s 5s/step - loss: 14.6159 - age_mae: 13.5181 - val_loss: 15.7551 - val_age_mae: 29.4640

    Epoch 00003: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
    Epoch 4/100
    140/140 [==============================] - 815s 6s/step - loss: 14.6509 - age_mae: 13.0087 - val_loss: 15.9366 - val_age_mae: 18.3581

    Epoch 00004: val_age_mae improved from 24.85268 to 18.35811, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.004-15.937-18.358.hdf5
    Epoch 5/100
    140/140 [==============================] - 1059s 8s/step - loss: 14.3882 - age_mae: 11.8039 - val_loss: 15.6825 - val_age_mae: 24.6937

    Epoch 00005: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811
    Epoch 6/100
    140/140 [==============================] - 1052s 8s/step - loss: 14.4496 - age_mae: 13.6652 - val_loss: 15.4278 - val_age_mae: 24.5045

    Epoch 00006: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811



    I already ruined this couple times, and after epoch 4 it is not improving anymore.



    I get the following loss graph



    loss graph result










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am doing transfer learning on a pre-trained model with an own dataset.
      I am loading the model like:



       train_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
      train_data_dir,
      target_size=(224, 224),
      batch_size=32,
      subset='training') # set as training data

      validation_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
      train_data_dir, # same directory as training data
      target_size=(224, 224),
      batch_size=32,
      subset='validation') # set as validation data


      model = ResNet50(include_top=False, weights=None, input_shape=(224,224,3))
      model.load_weights("a trained model weights on 224x224")

      model.layers.pop()

      for layer in model.layers:
      layer.trainable = False

      x = model.layers[-1].output

      x = Flatten(name='flatten')(x)
      x = Dropout(0.2)(x)
      x = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(x)
      predictions = Dense(101, activation='softmax', name='pred_age')(x)

      top_model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)

      top_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy',
      optimizer=adam,
      metrics=[accuracy])

      EPOCHS = 100
      BATCH_SIZE = 32
      STEPS_PER_EPOCH = 4424 // BATCH_SIZE
      VALIDATION_STEPS = 466 // BATCH_SIZE

      callbacks = [LearningRateScheduler(schedule=Schedule(EPOCHS, initial_lr=lr_rate)),
      ModelCheckpoint(str(output_dir) + "/weights.epoch:03d-val_loss:.3f-val_age_mae:.3f.hdf5",
      monitor="val_age_mae",
      verbose=1,
      save_best_only=False,
      mode="min")
      ]

      hist = top_model.fit_generator(generator=train_set,
      epochs=EPOCHS,
      steps_per_epoch = STEPS_PER_EPOCH,
      validation_data=val_set,
      validation_steps = VALIDATION_STEPS,
      verbose=1,
      callbacks=callbacks)



      activation_49 (Activation) (None, 7, 7, 2048) 0 add_16[0][0]
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________
      flatten (Flatten) (None, 100352) 0 activation_49[0][0]
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________
      dense_1 (Dense) (None, 512) 51380736 flatten[0][0]
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________
      pred_age (Dense) (None, 101) 51813 dense_1[0][0]
      ==================================================================================================
      Total params: 75,020,261
      Trainable params: 51,432,549
      Non-trainable params: 23,587,712
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________



      Epoch 1/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 1033s 7s/step - loss: 14.5776 - age_mae: 12.2994 - val_loss: 15.6144 - val_age_mae: 24.8527

      Epoch 00001: val_age_mae improved from inf to 24.85268, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.001-15.614-24.853.hdf5
      Epoch 2/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 969s 7s/step - loss: 14.7104 - age_mae: 11.2545 - val_loss: 15.6462 - val_age_mae: 25.1104

      Epoch 00002: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
      Epoch 3/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 769s 5s/step - loss: 14.6159 - age_mae: 13.5181 - val_loss: 15.7551 - val_age_mae: 29.4640

      Epoch 00003: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
      Epoch 4/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 815s 6s/step - loss: 14.6509 - age_mae: 13.0087 - val_loss: 15.9366 - val_age_mae: 18.3581

      Epoch 00004: val_age_mae improved from 24.85268 to 18.35811, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.004-15.937-18.358.hdf5
      Epoch 5/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 1059s 8s/step - loss: 14.3882 - age_mae: 11.8039 - val_loss: 15.6825 - val_age_mae: 24.6937

      Epoch 00005: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811
      Epoch 6/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 1052s 8s/step - loss: 14.4496 - age_mae: 13.6652 - val_loss: 15.4278 - val_age_mae: 24.5045

      Epoch 00006: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811



      I already ruined this couple times, and after epoch 4 it is not improving anymore.



      I get the following loss graph



      loss graph result










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am doing transfer learning on a pre-trained model with an own dataset.
      I am loading the model like:



       train_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
      train_data_dir,
      target_size=(224, 224),
      batch_size=32,
      subset='training') # set as training data

      validation_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
      train_data_dir, # same directory as training data
      target_size=(224, 224),
      batch_size=32,
      subset='validation') # set as validation data


      model = ResNet50(include_top=False, weights=None, input_shape=(224,224,3))
      model.load_weights("a trained model weights on 224x224")

      model.layers.pop()

      for layer in model.layers:
      layer.trainable = False

      x = model.layers[-1].output

      x = Flatten(name='flatten')(x)
      x = Dropout(0.2)(x)
      x = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(x)
      predictions = Dense(101, activation='softmax', name='pred_age')(x)

      top_model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)

      top_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy',
      optimizer=adam,
      metrics=[accuracy])

      EPOCHS = 100
      BATCH_SIZE = 32
      STEPS_PER_EPOCH = 4424 // BATCH_SIZE
      VALIDATION_STEPS = 466 // BATCH_SIZE

      callbacks = [LearningRateScheduler(schedule=Schedule(EPOCHS, initial_lr=lr_rate)),
      ModelCheckpoint(str(output_dir) + "/weights.epoch:03d-val_loss:.3f-val_age_mae:.3f.hdf5",
      monitor="val_age_mae",
      verbose=1,
      save_best_only=False,
      mode="min")
      ]

      hist = top_model.fit_generator(generator=train_set,
      epochs=EPOCHS,
      steps_per_epoch = STEPS_PER_EPOCH,
      validation_data=val_set,
      validation_steps = VALIDATION_STEPS,
      verbose=1,
      callbacks=callbacks)



      activation_49 (Activation) (None, 7, 7, 2048) 0 add_16[0][0]
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________
      flatten (Flatten) (None, 100352) 0 activation_49[0][0]
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________
      dense_1 (Dense) (None, 512) 51380736 flatten[0][0]
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________
      pred_age (Dense) (None, 101) 51813 dense_1[0][0]
      ==================================================================================================
      Total params: 75,020,261
      Trainable params: 51,432,549
      Non-trainable params: 23,587,712
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________



      Epoch 1/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 1033s 7s/step - loss: 14.5776 - age_mae: 12.2994 - val_loss: 15.6144 - val_age_mae: 24.8527

      Epoch 00001: val_age_mae improved from inf to 24.85268, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.001-15.614-24.853.hdf5
      Epoch 2/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 969s 7s/step - loss: 14.7104 - age_mae: 11.2545 - val_loss: 15.6462 - val_age_mae: 25.1104

      Epoch 00002: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
      Epoch 3/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 769s 5s/step - loss: 14.6159 - age_mae: 13.5181 - val_loss: 15.7551 - val_age_mae: 29.4640

      Epoch 00003: val_age_mae did not improve from 24.85268
      Epoch 4/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 815s 6s/step - loss: 14.6509 - age_mae: 13.0087 - val_loss: 15.9366 - val_age_mae: 18.3581

      Epoch 00004: val_age_mae improved from 24.85268 to 18.35811, saving model to /Users/aez/Desktop/AgeEstimation/yu4u/age_estimation/fine_tune_models/2_Finetune2//2-finetune-weights.004-15.937-18.358.hdf5
      Epoch 5/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 1059s 8s/step - loss: 14.3882 - age_mae: 11.8039 - val_loss: 15.6825 - val_age_mae: 24.6937

      Epoch 00005: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811
      Epoch 6/100
      140/140 [==============================] - 1052s 8s/step - loss: 14.4496 - age_mae: 13.6652 - val_loss: 15.4278 - val_age_mae: 24.5045

      Epoch 00006: val_age_mae did not improve from 18.35811



      I already ruined this couple times, and after epoch 4 it is not improving anymore.



      I get the following loss graph



      loss graph result







      python neural-network keras cnn transfer-learning






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago







      TheJokerAEZ













      New contributor




      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      TheJokerAEZTheJokerAEZ

      11




      11




      New contributor




      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48471%2ftransfer-learning-no-improvement-in-loss%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          TheJokerAEZ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48471%2ftransfer-learning-no-improvement-in-loss%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

          ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

          Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery