Determining the ideals of a quotient ring Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$Ideals of the quotient ring of AForm of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringExistence of minimal prime ideal contained in given prime ideal and containing a given subsetThe prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsNon Zero ideals of $mathbfZ_12$

Why is an operator the quantum mechanical analogue of an observable?

What is it called when you ride around on your front wheel?

Expansion//Explosion and Siren Stormtamer

Book with legacy programming code on a space ship that the main character hacks to escape

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

Second order approximation of the loss function (Deep learning book, 7.33)

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

AI positioning circles within an arc at equal distances and heights

Where did Arya get these scars?

Split coins into combinations of different denominations

Who is Alexandra K. Trenfor? Did she say the quote?

Implementing 3DES algorithm in Java: is my code secure?

SQL Query not selecting all points that it should?

Why is this method for solving linear equations systems using determinants works?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

Flash for group photos near wall

Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?

Is a 5 watt UHF/VHF handheld considered QRP?

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?

What units are pgfphysicalheight and pgfphysicalwidth defined in?

Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?



Determining the ideals of a quotient ring



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$Ideals of the quotient ring of AForm of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringExistence of minimal prime ideal contained in given prime ideal and containing a given subsetThe prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsNon Zero ideals of $mathbfZ_12$










2












$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    6 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    6 hours ago













2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.







abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Servaes

31.1k342101




31.1k342101






New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









MashaMasha

313




313




New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



    $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



    We know that:




    1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

    2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

    So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



    Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



    Now, note that:



    1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

    2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

    and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



    $$
    0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex Wertheim
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex Wertheim
      4 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      4 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
    $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
    qquadiffqquad
    x^3-xinlangle frangle
    qquadiffqquad
    ftext divides x^3-x.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
      $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
      qquadiffqquad
      x^3-xinlangle frangle
      qquadiffqquad
      ftext divides x^3-x.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
        $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        x^3-xinlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        ftext divides x^3-x.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
        $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        x^3-xinlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        ftext divides x^3-x.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 5 hours ago









        ServaesServaes

        31.1k342101




        31.1k342101





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat

            3,3471918




            3,3471918







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              4 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              4 hours ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            4 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            4 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            4 hours ago










            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

            ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

            Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery