Mapping between original feature space and an interpretable feature spaceWhat is dimensionality reduction? What is the difference between feature selection and extraction?Document classification: tf-idf prior to or after feature filtering?What is the difference between feature generation and feature extraction?Is there any difference between feature extraction and feature learning?Feature Extraction and Vector Space ModelFeature extraction from relational databaseFeature selection - QR code localizationFeature Selection Algorithm for Attributes with Logical Relationships (like “AND”)Feature importance over a subset of instance space instead of an entire instance spaceFeature Extraction

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

Which big number is bigger?

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

Why does Mind Blank stop the Feeblemind spell?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Initiative: Do I lose my attack/action if my target moves or dies before my turn in combat?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

What happened to Captain America in Endgame?

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?

What is the smallest unit of eos?

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

Why did some of my point & shoot film photos come back with one third light white or orange?

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Is there any official lore on the Far Realm?

Elements that can bond to themselves?

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat

Are there physical dangers to preparing a prepared piano?



Mapping between original feature space and an interpretable feature space


What is dimensionality reduction? What is the difference between feature selection and extraction?Document classification: tf-idf prior to or after feature filtering?What is the difference between feature generation and feature extraction?Is there any difference between feature extraction and feature learning?Feature Extraction and Vector Space ModelFeature extraction from relational databaseFeature selection - QR code localizationFeature Selection Algorithm for Attributes with Logical Relationships (like “AND”)Feature importance over a subset of instance space instead of an entire instance spaceFeature Extraction













1












$begingroup$


I'm reading the following really interesting paper



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04938.pdf on local interpretable model explanations



on page 3 however particularly section 3.3 Sampling for Local Exploration they mention obtaining perturbed samples $z' in 0,1^d'$, it then says



"we recover the sample in the original representation
$z in mathbbR^d$
and obtain $f(z)$ "



with no indication how this is done, surely the map is not injective? If not how would you know you recovered the correct sample? To this end, i wondering how something like this might be done in practice, moving from one feature space $mathbbR^d$ to another $0,1^d'$. I'd really appreciate any help.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 40 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.



















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm reading the following really interesting paper



    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04938.pdf on local interpretable model explanations



    on page 3 however particularly section 3.3 Sampling for Local Exploration they mention obtaining perturbed samples $z' in 0,1^d'$, it then says



    "we recover the sample in the original representation
    $z in mathbbR^d$
    and obtain $f(z)$ "



    with no indication how this is done, surely the map is not injective? If not how would you know you recovered the correct sample? To this end, i wondering how something like this might be done in practice, moving from one feature space $mathbbR^d$ to another $0,1^d'$. I'd really appreciate any help.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$




    bumped to the homepage by Community 40 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm reading the following really interesting paper



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04938.pdf on local interpretable model explanations



      on page 3 however particularly section 3.3 Sampling for Local Exploration they mention obtaining perturbed samples $z' in 0,1^d'$, it then says



      "we recover the sample in the original representation
      $z in mathbbR^d$
      and obtain $f(z)$ "



      with no indication how this is done, surely the map is not injective? If not how would you know you recovered the correct sample? To this end, i wondering how something like this might be done in practice, moving from one feature space $mathbbR^d$ to another $0,1^d'$. I'd really appreciate any help.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm reading the following really interesting paper



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04938.pdf on local interpretable model explanations



      on page 3 however particularly section 3.3 Sampling for Local Exploration they mention obtaining perturbed samples $z' in 0,1^d'$, it then says



      "we recover the sample in the original representation
      $z in mathbbR^d$
      and obtain $f(z)$ "



      with no indication how this is done, surely the map is not injective? If not how would you know you recovered the correct sample? To this end, i wondering how something like this might be done in practice, moving from one feature space $mathbbR^d$ to another $0,1^d'$. I'd really appreciate any help.







      machine-learning classification feature-selection feature-extraction research






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Oct 26 '18 at 11:42







      iaaml

















      asked Oct 26 '18 at 11:24









      iaamliaaml

      63




      63





      bumped to the homepage by Community 40 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 40 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Welcome to the community @iaaml! I hope I understood the concept right by briefly going through your reference. This is my impression:



          in 3.1, they say




          For example, a possible interpretable representation for text
          classification is a binary vector indicating the presence or absence of
          a word.




          So, I suppose the point is something like Sparse Representation (you may look for sparse representation to see the methods and examples). For instance, an image vector which is predicted as cat can be explained by a 3d explainer, namely, nose, glasses and mouth. Nose and mouth are evidence for cat while glasses is a human face feature (very naive example). So having a vocabulary for all explainers, you can come up with a sparse representation of each decision in which, significant criteria are represented with 0 or 1 to help validating prediction. It happens by examining the features which contribute the most to that class (that's why in Figure.1 they could understand that "No Fatigue" observation is against the prediction).



          To obtain such representation, you can build the vocabulary (a set of features which are significant and all together cover whole or most of the space). Then you map your data on these space in which presence of each element of vocabulary is 0 or 1.



          Example



          I have three samples and their corresponding predictions:



          a) Spanish is the main language in Buenos Aires :Argentina
          b) Apple released its new software :IT
          c) Apple is the man agriculture product in Buenos Aires :Argentina


          Using BoW for constructing the feature space, Apple becomes an important feature as it is a famous IT company, but in the last sentence it affects in a wrong way. Alongside, you can also have a map of which feature contributes the most to which class (let's say through Mutual Information or any other feature ranking method, specified on different classes) and construct the matrices below:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 1


          when you have what should happen according to the feature ranking for each class:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 0


          comparing these two gives you the probably-wrong Apple in last sentence (like "No Fatigue" in Figure.1). The first matrix is the mapping that you do, and the second is the mapping that feature ranking gives you.



          Hope I understood it right!






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 13:55











          • $begingroup$
            I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19










          • $begingroup$
            I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 15:10











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40267%2fmapping-between-original-feature-space-and-an-interpretable-feature-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Welcome to the community @iaaml! I hope I understood the concept right by briefly going through your reference. This is my impression:



          in 3.1, they say




          For example, a possible interpretable representation for text
          classification is a binary vector indicating the presence or absence of
          a word.




          So, I suppose the point is something like Sparse Representation (you may look for sparse representation to see the methods and examples). For instance, an image vector which is predicted as cat can be explained by a 3d explainer, namely, nose, glasses and mouth. Nose and mouth are evidence for cat while glasses is a human face feature (very naive example). So having a vocabulary for all explainers, you can come up with a sparse representation of each decision in which, significant criteria are represented with 0 or 1 to help validating prediction. It happens by examining the features which contribute the most to that class (that's why in Figure.1 they could understand that "No Fatigue" observation is against the prediction).



          To obtain such representation, you can build the vocabulary (a set of features which are significant and all together cover whole or most of the space). Then you map your data on these space in which presence of each element of vocabulary is 0 or 1.



          Example



          I have three samples and their corresponding predictions:



          a) Spanish is the main language in Buenos Aires :Argentina
          b) Apple released its new software :IT
          c) Apple is the man agriculture product in Buenos Aires :Argentina


          Using BoW for constructing the feature space, Apple becomes an important feature as it is a famous IT company, but in the last sentence it affects in a wrong way. Alongside, you can also have a map of which feature contributes the most to which class (let's say through Mutual Information or any other feature ranking method, specified on different classes) and construct the matrices below:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 1


          when you have what should happen according to the feature ranking for each class:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 0


          comparing these two gives you the probably-wrong Apple in last sentence (like "No Fatigue" in Figure.1). The first matrix is the mapping that you do, and the second is the mapping that feature ranking gives you.



          Hope I understood it right!






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 13:55











          • $begingroup$
            I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19










          • $begingroup$
            I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 15:10















          0












          $begingroup$

          Welcome to the community @iaaml! I hope I understood the concept right by briefly going through your reference. This is my impression:



          in 3.1, they say




          For example, a possible interpretable representation for text
          classification is a binary vector indicating the presence or absence of
          a word.




          So, I suppose the point is something like Sparse Representation (you may look for sparse representation to see the methods and examples). For instance, an image vector which is predicted as cat can be explained by a 3d explainer, namely, nose, glasses and mouth. Nose and mouth are evidence for cat while glasses is a human face feature (very naive example). So having a vocabulary for all explainers, you can come up with a sparse representation of each decision in which, significant criteria are represented with 0 or 1 to help validating prediction. It happens by examining the features which contribute the most to that class (that's why in Figure.1 they could understand that "No Fatigue" observation is against the prediction).



          To obtain such representation, you can build the vocabulary (a set of features which are significant and all together cover whole or most of the space). Then you map your data on these space in which presence of each element of vocabulary is 0 or 1.



          Example



          I have three samples and their corresponding predictions:



          a) Spanish is the main language in Buenos Aires :Argentina
          b) Apple released its new software :IT
          c) Apple is the man agriculture product in Buenos Aires :Argentina


          Using BoW for constructing the feature space, Apple becomes an important feature as it is a famous IT company, but in the last sentence it affects in a wrong way. Alongside, you can also have a map of which feature contributes the most to which class (let's say through Mutual Information or any other feature ranking method, specified on different classes) and construct the matrices below:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 1


          when you have what should happen according to the feature ranking for each class:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 0


          comparing these two gives you the probably-wrong Apple in last sentence (like "No Fatigue" in Figure.1). The first matrix is the mapping that you do, and the second is the mapping that feature ranking gives you.



          Hope I understood it right!






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 13:55











          • $begingroup$
            I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19










          • $begingroup$
            I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 15:10













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Welcome to the community @iaaml! I hope I understood the concept right by briefly going through your reference. This is my impression:



          in 3.1, they say




          For example, a possible interpretable representation for text
          classification is a binary vector indicating the presence or absence of
          a word.




          So, I suppose the point is something like Sparse Representation (you may look for sparse representation to see the methods and examples). For instance, an image vector which is predicted as cat can be explained by a 3d explainer, namely, nose, glasses and mouth. Nose and mouth are evidence for cat while glasses is a human face feature (very naive example). So having a vocabulary for all explainers, you can come up with a sparse representation of each decision in which, significant criteria are represented with 0 or 1 to help validating prediction. It happens by examining the features which contribute the most to that class (that's why in Figure.1 they could understand that "No Fatigue" observation is against the prediction).



          To obtain such representation, you can build the vocabulary (a set of features which are significant and all together cover whole or most of the space). Then you map your data on these space in which presence of each element of vocabulary is 0 or 1.



          Example



          I have three samples and their corresponding predictions:



          a) Spanish is the main language in Buenos Aires :Argentina
          b) Apple released its new software :IT
          c) Apple is the man agriculture product in Buenos Aires :Argentina


          Using BoW for constructing the feature space, Apple becomes an important feature as it is a famous IT company, but in the last sentence it affects in a wrong way. Alongside, you can also have a map of which feature contributes the most to which class (let's say through Mutual Information or any other feature ranking method, specified on different classes) and construct the matrices below:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 1


          when you have what should happen according to the feature ranking for each class:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 0


          comparing these two gives you the probably-wrong Apple in last sentence (like "No Fatigue" in Figure.1). The first matrix is the mapping that you do, and the second is the mapping that feature ranking gives you.



          Hope I understood it right!






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Welcome to the community @iaaml! I hope I understood the concept right by briefly going through your reference. This is my impression:



          in 3.1, they say




          For example, a possible interpretable representation for text
          classification is a binary vector indicating the presence or absence of
          a word.




          So, I suppose the point is something like Sparse Representation (you may look for sparse representation to see the methods and examples). For instance, an image vector which is predicted as cat can be explained by a 3d explainer, namely, nose, glasses and mouth. Nose and mouth are evidence for cat while glasses is a human face feature (very naive example). So having a vocabulary for all explainers, you can come up with a sparse representation of each decision in which, significant criteria are represented with 0 or 1 to help validating prediction. It happens by examining the features which contribute the most to that class (that's why in Figure.1 they could understand that "No Fatigue" observation is against the prediction).



          To obtain such representation, you can build the vocabulary (a set of features which are significant and all together cover whole or most of the space). Then you map your data on these space in which presence of each element of vocabulary is 0 or 1.



          Example



          I have three samples and their corresponding predictions:



          a) Spanish is the main language in Buenos Aires :Argentina
          b) Apple released its new software :IT
          c) Apple is the man agriculture product in Buenos Aires :Argentina


          Using BoW for constructing the feature space, Apple becomes an important feature as it is a famous IT company, but in the last sentence it affects in a wrong way. Alongside, you can also have a map of which feature contributes the most to which class (let's say through Mutual Information or any other feature ranking method, specified on different classes) and construct the matrices below:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 1


          when you have what should happen according to the feature ranking for each class:



           BuenosAires Apple
          a 1 0
          b 0 1
          c 1 0


          comparing these two gives you the probably-wrong Apple in last sentence (like "No Fatigue" in Figure.1). The first matrix is the mapping that you do, and the second is the mapping that feature ranking gives you.



          Hope I understood it right!







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Oct 26 '18 at 12:04









          Kasra ManshaeiKasra Manshaei

          3,8171135




          3,8171135











          • $begingroup$
            Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 13:55











          • $begingroup$
            I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19










          • $begingroup$
            I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 15:10
















          • $begingroup$
            Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 13:55











          • $begingroup$
            I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19










          • $begingroup$
            I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
            $endgroup$
            – Kasra Manshaei
            Oct 26 '18 at 14:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
            $endgroup$
            – iaaml
            Oct 26 '18 at 15:10















          $begingroup$
          Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
          $endgroup$
          – iaaml
          Oct 26 '18 at 13:55





          $begingroup$
          Hi Kasra, I think i understand the mapping from lets say sentences to the bag of words example this is the mapping $x in mathbbR^d$ to $x' in 0,1^d'$. What i'm confused with is that the space that gets perturbed is $0,1^d'$ in a sense allowing us to create synthetic data, but then to evaluate the a model in this new space given some $z'$ from the perturbation how do we find the original $z$? So i guess in this case it would be like saying given a bag of words representation how would i know what the original sentence looked like? Correct me if you actually did explain this.
          $endgroup$
          – iaaml
          Oct 26 '18 at 13:55













          $begingroup$
          I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
          $endgroup$
          – iaaml
          Oct 26 '18 at 14:03




          $begingroup$
          I just looked into the sparse matrix representation, it looks like although there are infinitely many solutions they find a way to get back to the original space so would that be the solution?
          $endgroup$
          – iaaml
          Oct 26 '18 at 14:03












          $begingroup$
          Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
          $endgroup$
          – Kasra Manshaei
          Oct 26 '18 at 14:19




          $begingroup$
          Yes but here I have the same confusion. The fact is that if they choose a fraction of features, then they can not recover the point in the original space as they cut the information. I think they choose a fraction of features and set others to zero. In this case you can have a representation which approximates a desired neighborhood in the original space. Or they purturb a fraction of features WHILE KEEPING THE REST. So concatenating new samples with rest of original features takes them back to the original space.
          $endgroup$
          – Kasra Manshaei
          Oct 26 '18 at 14:19












          $begingroup$
          I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
          $endgroup$
          – Kasra Manshaei
          Oct 26 '18 at 14:19




          $begingroup$
          I admit it was not an easy question. Just tried it. Seems we need to sleep on it more.
          $endgroup$
          – Kasra Manshaei
          Oct 26 '18 at 14:19




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
          $endgroup$
          – iaaml
          Oct 26 '18 at 15:10




          $begingroup$
          Thanks anyway! Look forward to finding a potential solution
          $endgroup$
          – iaaml
          Oct 26 '18 at 15:10

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40267%2fmapping-between-original-feature-space-and-an-interpretable-feature-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

          На ростанях Змест Гісторыя напісання | Месца дзеяння | Час дзеяння | Назва | Праблематыка трылогіі | Аўтабіяграфічнасць | Трылогія ў тэатры і кіно | Пераклады | У культуры | Зноскі Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаАкадэмік МІЦКЕВІЧ Канстанцін Міхайлавіч (Якуб Колас) Прадмова М. І. Мушынскага, доктара філалагічных навук, члена-карэспандэнта Нацыянальнай акадэміі навук Рэспублікі Беларусь, прафесараНашаніўцы ў трылогіі Якуба Коласа «На ростанях»: вобразы і прататыпы125 лет Янке МавруКнижно-документальная выставка к 125-летию со дня рождения Якуба Коласа (1882—1956)Колас Якуб. Новая зямля (паэма), На ростанях (трылогія). Сулкоўскі Уладзімір. Радзіма Якуба Коласа (серыял жывапісных палотнаў)Вокладка кнігіІлюстрацыя М. С. БасалыгіНа ростаняхАўдыёверсія трылогііВ. Жолтак У Люсiнскай школе 1959

          Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп