How to prevent z-fighting in OpenSCAD?How to remove internal part of a hex gridAre there any “best” or at least “common” practices to handle allowances in OpenSCAD code?OpenSCAD library for empty space/holesHow to specify rotation origin in openscadOpenSCAD editor font is unreadableOpenSCAD 2018 Command lineOpenSCAD “not valid 2-manifold” useful informationWhy is 2 / -2 / 2 equal to -2 in OpenSCAD? (Mathematical Order of Operations)

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

Coordinate my way to the name of the (video) game

Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?

Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB

Multiple options vs single option UI

Can an Area of Effect spell cast outside a Prismatic Wall extend inside it?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

Overlay of two functions leaves gaps

'It addicted me, with one taste.' Can 'addict' be used transitively?

Function pointer with named arguments?

What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

Constructions of PRF (Pseudo Random Function)

How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?

Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?

What are the steps to solving this definite integral?

What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?

Read line from file and process something

What happened to Captain America in Endgame?

Map of water taps to fill bottles

How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned

"Hidden" theta-term in Hamiltonian formulation of Yang-Mills theory

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?



How to prevent z-fighting in OpenSCAD?


How to remove internal part of a hex gridAre there any “best” or at least “common” practices to handle allowances in OpenSCAD code?OpenSCAD library for empty space/holesHow to specify rotation origin in openscadOpenSCAD editor font is unreadableOpenSCAD 2018 Command lineOpenSCAD “not valid 2-manifold” useful informationWhy is 2 / -2 / 2 equal to -2 in OpenSCAD? (Mathematical Order of Operations)













2












$begingroup$


Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



How best to avoid z-fighting?



If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.










share|improve this question









New contributor




tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



    It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



    How best to avoid z-fighting?



    If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



      It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



      How best to avoid z-fighting?



      If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Z-fighting is a 3D rendering artifact of coplanar surfaces (means, triangles are located in exactly the same plane, and overlap).



      It can happen in OpenSCAD's preview mode when doing a difference() or union() operation. In case of difference(), the rendering artifacts can prevent seeing into a hole in the object. The "compile and render" mode in OpenSCAD does not have z-fighting issues, but it can take some time to render an object.



      How best to avoid z-fighting?



      If the answer involves changes to the code, I would love to see an idiomatic answer / established convention of OpenSCAD coders, if that exists.







      openscad






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 43 mins ago







      tanius













      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      taniustanius

      1435




      1435




      New contributor




      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "640"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9794%2fhow-to-prevent-z-fighting-in-openscad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            2 hours ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            2 hours ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          The general advice in the OpenSCAD community is to "extend your cuts and embed your joins" (source). Not just because of the rendering artifacts but also because z-fighting can cause unexpected errors during STL export.



          So you would change the dimensions of your objects very slightly (0.01 mm works fine) so that:



          • for a union(), there is overlap volume between the parts

          • for a difference(), the intersector has volume both inside and outside of the intersected part

          Now you could adjust both the size and position of your parts to keep the mathematically exact dimensions for the resulting part. But I found that for the purposes of 3D printing, such accuracy is not worth it because it complicates the formulas so much.



          Instead, I adjust either position or size of a part, depending on what is simpler in each case. A measure in the final design will be off by 0.01 mm, which does not matter.



          And I keep the 0.01 mm offset in a variable called nothing (picked that up somewhere and liked it …). This keeps the calculations intuitively understandable.



          Example



          To create a cylinder and cut a hole to half of its depth, it would do this:



          //!OpenSCAD
          nothing=0.01;
          height=40;

          difference()
          cylinder(h=height, r=20, center=true);

          translate([0, 0, height/4 + nothing])
          cylinder(h=height/2, r=15, center=true);



          Now the hole is nothing=0.01 less deep than half of the cylinder – that's the inaccuracy I accept.



          (Note: You can try the above code online by copy & pasting it into OpenJSCAD. Include the magic comment in the first line to switch it to OpenSCAD syntax.)







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 30 mins ago





















          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 4 hours ago









          taniustanius

          1435




          1435




          New contributor




          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          tanius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            2 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
            $endgroup$
            – fred_dot_u
            2 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
          $endgroup$
          – fred_dot_u
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Your answer is the one I'd post for this question. You add the parameter "nothing" while I use "addabit = 0.1" for most z actions.
          $endgroup$
          – fred_dot_u
          2 hours ago










          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          tanius is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to 3D Printing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9794%2fhow-to-prevent-z-fighting-in-openscad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

          Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

          Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery