How to create an ensemble that gives precedence to a specific classifier2019 Community Moderator ElectionMeasuring performance of different classifiers with different sample sizesMulti-label text classification with minimum confidence thresholdunbalanced data classificationBad classification performance of logistic regression on imbalanced data in testing as compared to trainingHow much should I pay attention to the f1 score on this case?Sci-kit learn function to select threshold for higher recall than precisionBinary classification, precision-recall curve and thresholdsClassifier that optimizes performance on only a subset of the data?Why is the area under the precision-recall curve not used as scoring function more often?Improve precision of binary classification - SVM in Matlab

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Why is my log file so massive? 22gb. I am running log backups

How to create a consistent feel for character names in a fantasy setting?

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?

What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?

Lied on resume at previous job

Add an angle to a sphere

Copycat chess is back

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?

Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance

Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors



How to create an ensemble that gives precedence to a specific classifier



2019 Community Moderator ElectionMeasuring performance of different classifiers with different sample sizesMulti-label text classification with minimum confidence thresholdunbalanced data classificationBad classification performance of logistic regression on imbalanced data in testing as compared to trainingHow much should I pay attention to the f1 score on this case?Sci-kit learn function to select threshold for higher recall than precisionBinary classification, precision-recall curve and thresholdsClassifier that optimizes performance on only a subset of the data?Why is the area under the precision-recall curve not used as scoring function more often?Improve precision of binary classification - SVM in Matlab










2












$begingroup$


Suppose that in a binary classification task, I have separate classifiers A, B, and C. If I use A alone, I will get a high precision, but low recall. In other words, the number of true positives are very high, but it also incorrectly tags the rest of the labels as False. B, and C have much lower precision, but when used separately, they may (or may not) result in better recall. How can I define an ensemble classifier that gives precedence to classifier A only in cases where it labels the data as True and give more weight to the predictions of other classifiers when A predicts the label as False.



The idea is, A is already outperforming others in catching true positives and I only want to improve the recall without hurting precision.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 16 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Ensemble models learn the correct weights for you. Read about boosting and stacking. You can tune the ensemble classifier to yield the recall/precision trade-off you desire. Welcome to the site!
    $endgroup$
    – Emre
    Jan 11 '18 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    can you describe the data? what kind of classifiers you are using?
    $endgroup$
    – Bashar Haddad
    Apr 12 '18 at 0:35















2












$begingroup$


Suppose that in a binary classification task, I have separate classifiers A, B, and C. If I use A alone, I will get a high precision, but low recall. In other words, the number of true positives are very high, but it also incorrectly tags the rest of the labels as False. B, and C have much lower precision, but when used separately, they may (or may not) result in better recall. How can I define an ensemble classifier that gives precedence to classifier A only in cases where it labels the data as True and give more weight to the predictions of other classifiers when A predicts the label as False.



The idea is, A is already outperforming others in catching true positives and I only want to improve the recall without hurting precision.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 16 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Ensemble models learn the correct weights for you. Read about boosting and stacking. You can tune the ensemble classifier to yield the recall/precision trade-off you desire. Welcome to the site!
    $endgroup$
    – Emre
    Jan 11 '18 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    can you describe the data? what kind of classifiers you are using?
    $endgroup$
    – Bashar Haddad
    Apr 12 '18 at 0:35













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Suppose that in a binary classification task, I have separate classifiers A, B, and C. If I use A alone, I will get a high precision, but low recall. In other words, the number of true positives are very high, but it also incorrectly tags the rest of the labels as False. B, and C have much lower precision, but when used separately, they may (or may not) result in better recall. How can I define an ensemble classifier that gives precedence to classifier A only in cases where it labels the data as True and give more weight to the predictions of other classifiers when A predicts the label as False.



The idea is, A is already outperforming others in catching true positives and I only want to improve the recall without hurting precision.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose that in a binary classification task, I have separate classifiers A, B, and C. If I use A alone, I will get a high precision, but low recall. In other words, the number of true positives are very high, but it also incorrectly tags the rest of the labels as False. B, and C have much lower precision, but when used separately, they may (or may not) result in better recall. How can I define an ensemble classifier that gives precedence to classifier A only in cases where it labels the data as True and give more weight to the predictions of other classifiers when A predicts the label as False.



The idea is, A is already outperforming others in catching true positives and I only want to improve the recall without hurting precision.







classification prediction ensemble-modeling binary ensemble






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 11 '18 at 19:13









Clement AttleeClement Attlee

111




111





bumped to the homepage by Community 16 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 16 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Ensemble models learn the correct weights for you. Read about boosting and stacking. You can tune the ensemble classifier to yield the recall/precision trade-off you desire. Welcome to the site!
    $endgroup$
    – Emre
    Jan 11 '18 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    can you describe the data? what kind of classifiers you are using?
    $endgroup$
    – Bashar Haddad
    Apr 12 '18 at 0:35












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Ensemble models learn the correct weights for you. Read about boosting and stacking. You can tune the ensemble classifier to yield the recall/precision trade-off you desire. Welcome to the site!
    $endgroup$
    – Emre
    Jan 11 '18 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    can you describe the data? what kind of classifiers you are using?
    $endgroup$
    – Bashar Haddad
    Apr 12 '18 at 0:35







4




4




$begingroup$
Ensemble models learn the correct weights for you. Read about boosting and stacking. You can tune the ensemble classifier to yield the recall/precision trade-off you desire. Welcome to the site!
$endgroup$
– Emre
Jan 11 '18 at 19:27




$begingroup$
Ensemble models learn the correct weights for you. Read about boosting and stacking. You can tune the ensemble classifier to yield the recall/precision trade-off you desire. Welcome to the site!
$endgroup$
– Emre
Jan 11 '18 at 19:27












$begingroup$
can you describe the data? what kind of classifiers you are using?
$endgroup$
– Bashar Haddad
Apr 12 '18 at 0:35




$begingroup$
can you describe the data? what kind of classifiers you are using?
$endgroup$
– Bashar Haddad
Apr 12 '18 at 0:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Feature-Weighted Linear Stacking might be what you are looking for.




FWLS combines model predictions linearly using coefficients that are
themselves linear functions of meta-features.




In your example you can use the meta-feature "Does A label the example as True?"






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    based on your description, it looks like different models have different biases. two important questions: do you have any data imbalance problem? what kind of models you are using? using stacking based classifier is beneficial if you have different biases. Try to use a simple stack based classifier.
    for your level-1 classifier, use different models (e.g. SVM-L, SVM-NL, DT, RF, ... etc). For your meta-data, use probabilities and for the meta-classifier use Random Forest.



    if you have data imbalance problem using stack based classifier is a little bit more challenging.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "557"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26531%2fhow-to-create-an-ensemble-that-gives-precedence-to-a-specific-classifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      Feature-Weighted Linear Stacking might be what you are looking for.




      FWLS combines model predictions linearly using coefficients that are
      themselves linear functions of meta-features.




      In your example you can use the meta-feature "Does A label the example as True?"






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        0












        $begingroup$

        Feature-Weighted Linear Stacking might be what you are looking for.




        FWLS combines model predictions linearly using coefficients that are
        themselves linear functions of meta-features.




        In your example you can use the meta-feature "Does A label the example as True?"






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Feature-Weighted Linear Stacking might be what you are looking for.




          FWLS combines model predictions linearly using coefficients that are
          themselves linear functions of meta-features.




          In your example you can use the meta-feature "Does A label the example as True?"






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Feature-Weighted Linear Stacking might be what you are looking for.




          FWLS combines model predictions linearly using coefficients that are
          themselves linear functions of meta-features.




          In your example you can use the meta-feature "Does A label the example as True?"







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 11 '18 at 20:06









          ImranImran

          1,756619




          1,756619





















              0












              $begingroup$

              based on your description, it looks like different models have different biases. two important questions: do you have any data imbalance problem? what kind of models you are using? using stacking based classifier is beneficial if you have different biases. Try to use a simple stack based classifier.
              for your level-1 classifier, use different models (e.g. SVM-L, SVM-NL, DT, RF, ... etc). For your meta-data, use probabilities and for the meta-classifier use Random Forest.



              if you have data imbalance problem using stack based classifier is a little bit more challenging.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                based on your description, it looks like different models have different biases. two important questions: do you have any data imbalance problem? what kind of models you are using? using stacking based classifier is beneficial if you have different biases. Try to use a simple stack based classifier.
                for your level-1 classifier, use different models (e.g. SVM-L, SVM-NL, DT, RF, ... etc). For your meta-data, use probabilities and for the meta-classifier use Random Forest.



                if you have data imbalance problem using stack based classifier is a little bit more challenging.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  based on your description, it looks like different models have different biases. two important questions: do you have any data imbalance problem? what kind of models you are using? using stacking based classifier is beneficial if you have different biases. Try to use a simple stack based classifier.
                  for your level-1 classifier, use different models (e.g. SVM-L, SVM-NL, DT, RF, ... etc). For your meta-data, use probabilities and for the meta-classifier use Random Forest.



                  if you have data imbalance problem using stack based classifier is a little bit more challenging.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  based on your description, it looks like different models have different biases. two important questions: do you have any data imbalance problem? what kind of models you are using? using stacking based classifier is beneficial if you have different biases. Try to use a simple stack based classifier.
                  for your level-1 classifier, use different models (e.g. SVM-L, SVM-NL, DT, RF, ... etc). For your meta-data, use probabilities and for the meta-classifier use Random Forest.



                  if you have data imbalance problem using stack based classifier is a little bit more challenging.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 12 '18 at 0:39









                  Bashar HaddadBashar Haddad

                  1,2621413




                  1,2621413



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26531%2fhow-to-create-an-ensemble-that-gives-precedence-to-a-specific-classifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

                      Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

                      Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery