Showing a sum is positiveFinding Binomial expansion of a radicalSimplify the Expression $sum _ k=0 ^ n binomnki^k3^k-n $Alternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinomm+rn=sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinommr2^r$Proof by induction, binomial coefficientApproximating a binomial sum over a simplexHow to expand $sqrtx^6+1$ using Maclaurin's seriesSum of $m choose j$ multiplied by $2^2^j$How to show that $sumlimits_k=0^n (-1)^ktfrac nchoosek x+kchoosek = fracxx+n$Finite sum with inverse binomialShowing an alternating sum is positive
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
What is the difference between lands and mana?
Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?
What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile
How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?
Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?
Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for "negates"?
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?
What does Apple's new App Store requirement mean
What is Cash Advance APR?
How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
Quoting Keynes in a lecture
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
How can ping know if my host is down
How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?
Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?
Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?
C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexpr
Showing a sum is positive
Finding Binomial expansion of a radicalSimplify the Expression $sum _ k=0 ^ n binomnki^k3^k-n $Alternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinomm+rn=sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinommr2^r$Proof by induction, binomial coefficientApproximating a binomial sum over a simplexHow to expand $sqrtx^6+1$ using Maclaurin's seriesSum of $m choose j$ multiplied by $2^2^j$How to show that $sumlimits_k=0^n (-1)^ktfrac nchoosek x+kchoosek = fracxx+n$Finite sum with inverse binomialShowing an alternating sum is positive
$begingroup$
Show that the sum$$sum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1$$ is a positive rational number.
It is easy to show that it is a rational number. But I am having trouble showing that this expression is positive. It might be some binomial expansion that I could not get.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients binomial-ideals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that the sum$$sum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1$$ is a positive rational number.
It is easy to show that it is a rational number. But I am having trouble showing that this expression is positive. It might be some binomial expansion that I could not get.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients binomial-ideals
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried using induction on $n$ for example?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that the sum$$sum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1$$ is a positive rational number.
It is easy to show that it is a rational number. But I am having trouble showing that this expression is positive. It might be some binomial expansion that I could not get.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients binomial-ideals
$endgroup$
Show that the sum$$sum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1$$ is a positive rational number.
It is easy to show that it is a rational number. But I am having trouble showing that this expression is positive. It might be some binomial expansion that I could not get.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients binomial-ideals
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients binomial-ideals
edited 1 hour ago
Hitendra Kumar
asked 1 hour ago
Hitendra KumarHitendra Kumar
606
606
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried using induction on $n$ for example?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried using induction on $n$ for example?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried using induction on $n$ for example?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Have you tried using induction on $n$ for example?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Direct proof:
$$beginsplit
sum_k=0^n nchoose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1 &=sum_k=0^n nchoose k(-1)^kint_0^1 x^n+kdx\
&=int_0^1x^nsum_k=0^n nchoose k(-x)^kdx\
&=int_0^1x^n(1-x)^ndx
endsplit$$
The latter is clearly a positive number.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When $k=0$ the term is positive. When $k=1$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=0$ TERM.
When $k=2$ the term is positive. When $k=3$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=2$ TERM.
.....
Get it?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can specifically prove that
$$
boxedsum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1=left((2n+1)binom2nnright)^-1
$$
To see this, shuffle a deck of $2n+1$ cards numbered $1$ to $n$. Consider this:
What is the probability that card number $n+1$ is in the middle of the deck, and cards numbered $1$ to $n$ are below it?
The easy answer is the fraction on the RHS. The LHS can be interpreted as an application of the principle of inclusion exclusion. Namely, we first take the probability that card number of $n+1$ is the lowest of the cards numbered $n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is the $k=0$ term. From this, for each $i=1,dots,n$, we subtract the probability that $n+1$ is the lowest of the list $i,n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is a bad event, because we want $n+1$ to be above $i$. Doing this for each $i$, we subtract $binomn1frac1n+2$. We then must add back in the doubly subtracted events, subtract the triple intersections, and so on, eventually ending with the alternating sum on the left.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157740%2fshowing-a-sum-is-positive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Direct proof:
$$beginsplit
sum_k=0^n nchoose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1 &=sum_k=0^n nchoose k(-1)^kint_0^1 x^n+kdx\
&=int_0^1x^nsum_k=0^n nchoose k(-x)^kdx\
&=int_0^1x^n(1-x)^ndx
endsplit$$
The latter is clearly a positive number.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Direct proof:
$$beginsplit
sum_k=0^n nchoose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1 &=sum_k=0^n nchoose k(-1)^kint_0^1 x^n+kdx\
&=int_0^1x^nsum_k=0^n nchoose k(-x)^kdx\
&=int_0^1x^n(1-x)^ndx
endsplit$$
The latter is clearly a positive number.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Direct proof:
$$beginsplit
sum_k=0^n nchoose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1 &=sum_k=0^n nchoose k(-1)^kint_0^1 x^n+kdx\
&=int_0^1x^nsum_k=0^n nchoose k(-x)^kdx\
&=int_0^1x^n(1-x)^ndx
endsplit$$
The latter is clearly a positive number.
$endgroup$
Direct proof:
$$beginsplit
sum_k=0^n nchoose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1 &=sum_k=0^n nchoose k(-1)^kint_0^1 x^n+kdx\
&=int_0^1x^nsum_k=0^n nchoose k(-x)^kdx\
&=int_0^1x^n(1-x)^ndx
endsplit$$
The latter is clearly a positive number.
answered 1 hour ago
Stefan LafonStefan Lafon
3,00019
3,00019
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks,I got it.
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
You're welcome!
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
How did you conclude that the sum is a limited integral? Do you know where can I find more on this on-line? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
39 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a "known trick" that $frac 1 p+1 = int_0^1x^pdx$. Then I noticed that the sum looked almost like that of the binomial theorem.
$endgroup$
– Stefan Lafon
34 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for responding.Got it.
$endgroup$
– NoChance
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When $k=0$ the term is positive. When $k=1$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=0$ TERM.
When $k=2$ the term is positive. When $k=3$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=2$ TERM.
.....
Get it?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When $k=0$ the term is positive. When $k=1$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=0$ TERM.
When $k=2$ the term is positive. When $k=3$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=2$ TERM.
.....
Get it?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When $k=0$ the term is positive. When $k=1$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=0$ TERM.
When $k=2$ the term is positive. When $k=3$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=2$ TERM.
.....
Get it?
$endgroup$
When $k=0$ the term is positive. When $k=1$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=0$ TERM.
When $k=2$ the term is positive. When $k=3$ the term is negative BUT SMALLER (in absolute value) THAN THE $k=2$ TERM.
.....
Get it?
answered 1 hour ago
David G. StorkDavid G. Stork
11.1k41432
11.1k41432
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
sorry, I did not write question correctly. Now, I have corrected that. By looking at your answer I realized my mistake. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Hitendra Kumar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can specifically prove that
$$
boxedsum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1=left((2n+1)binom2nnright)^-1
$$
To see this, shuffle a deck of $2n+1$ cards numbered $1$ to $n$. Consider this:
What is the probability that card number $n+1$ is in the middle of the deck, and cards numbered $1$ to $n$ are below it?
The easy answer is the fraction on the RHS. The LHS can be interpreted as an application of the principle of inclusion exclusion. Namely, we first take the probability that card number of $n+1$ is the lowest of the cards numbered $n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is the $k=0$ term. From this, for each $i=1,dots,n$, we subtract the probability that $n+1$ is the lowest of the list $i,n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is a bad event, because we want $n+1$ to be above $i$. Doing this for each $i$, we subtract $binomn1frac1n+2$. We then must add back in the doubly subtracted events, subtract the triple intersections, and so on, eventually ending with the alternating sum on the left.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can specifically prove that
$$
boxedsum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1=left((2n+1)binom2nnright)^-1
$$
To see this, shuffle a deck of $2n+1$ cards numbered $1$ to $n$. Consider this:
What is the probability that card number $n+1$ is in the middle of the deck, and cards numbered $1$ to $n$ are below it?
The easy answer is the fraction on the RHS. The LHS can be interpreted as an application of the principle of inclusion exclusion. Namely, we first take the probability that card number of $n+1$ is the lowest of the cards numbered $n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is the $k=0$ term. From this, for each $i=1,dots,n$, we subtract the probability that $n+1$ is the lowest of the list $i,n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is a bad event, because we want $n+1$ to be above $i$. Doing this for each $i$, we subtract $binomn1frac1n+2$. We then must add back in the doubly subtracted events, subtract the triple intersections, and so on, eventually ending with the alternating sum on the left.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can specifically prove that
$$
boxedsum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1=left((2n+1)binom2nnright)^-1
$$
To see this, shuffle a deck of $2n+1$ cards numbered $1$ to $n$. Consider this:
What is the probability that card number $n+1$ is in the middle of the deck, and cards numbered $1$ to $n$ are below it?
The easy answer is the fraction on the RHS. The LHS can be interpreted as an application of the principle of inclusion exclusion. Namely, we first take the probability that card number of $n+1$ is the lowest of the cards numbered $n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is the $k=0$ term. From this, for each $i=1,dots,n$, we subtract the probability that $n+1$ is the lowest of the list $i,n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is a bad event, because we want $n+1$ to be above $i$. Doing this for each $i$, we subtract $binomn1frac1n+2$. We then must add back in the doubly subtracted events, subtract the triple intersections, and so on, eventually ending with the alternating sum on the left.
$endgroup$
We can specifically prove that
$$
boxedsum_k=0^n n choose kfrac(-1)^kn+k+1=left((2n+1)binom2nnright)^-1
$$
To see this, shuffle a deck of $2n+1$ cards numbered $1$ to $n$. Consider this:
What is the probability that card number $n+1$ is in the middle of the deck, and cards numbered $1$ to $n$ are below it?
The easy answer is the fraction on the RHS. The LHS can be interpreted as an application of the principle of inclusion exclusion. Namely, we first take the probability that card number of $n+1$ is the lowest of the cards numbered $n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is the $k=0$ term. From this, for each $i=1,dots,n$, we subtract the probability that $n+1$ is the lowest of the list $i,n+1,n+2,dots,2n+1$. This is a bad event, because we want $n+1$ to be above $i$. Doing this for each $i$, we subtract $binomn1frac1n+2$. We then must add back in the doubly subtracted events, subtract the triple intersections, and so on, eventually ending with the alternating sum on the left.
answered 5 mins ago
Mike EarnestMike Earnest
25.5k22151
25.5k22151
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157740%2fshowing-a-sum-is-positive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried using induction on $n$ for example?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
1 hour ago