Is it ok to train the model only on the interested part of the data?Necessity of balancing positive/negative examples in binary classification machine learning?Is it good to remove outliers from the dataset?How to evaluate data capability to train a model?Train, test split of unbalanced dataset classificationIs it always better to use the whole dataset to train the final model?samples for different objects with unique labelsHow to correctly perform data sampling for train/test split in multi-label dataset?Is it correct to use non-target values of test set to engineer new features for train set?learning curve SklearnCan I use the test dataset to select a model?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

Stack Interview Code methods made from class Node and Smart Pointers

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

How to get directions in deep space?

What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?

Review your own paper in Mathematics

C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexpr

What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?

How does electrical safety system work on ISS?

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

What is the difference between lands and mana?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

Showing a sum is positive

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

How can I write humor as character trait?

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile



Is it ok to train the model only on the interested part of the data?


Necessity of balancing positive/negative examples in binary classification machine learning?Is it good to remove outliers from the dataset?How to evaluate data capability to train a model?Train, test split of unbalanced dataset classificationIs it always better to use the whole dataset to train the final model?samples for different objects with unique labelsHow to correctly perform data sampling for train/test split in multi-label dataset?Is it correct to use non-target values of test set to engineer new features for train set?learning curve SklearnCan I use the test dataset to select a model?













1












$begingroup$


Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

What are the pros and cons of both approaches?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.



















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

    The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

    Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

    What are the pros and cons of both approaches?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$




    bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

      The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

      Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

      What are the pros and cons of both approaches?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

      The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

      Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

      What are the pros and cons of both approaches?







      machine-learning dataset training






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 20 at 4:31









      idpd15idpd15

      1314




      1314





      bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



          How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



          Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



          If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



          However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "557"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45849%2fis-it-ok-to-train-the-model-only-on-the-interested-part-of-the-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



            How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



            Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



            If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



            However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



              How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



              Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



              If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



              However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



                How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



                Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



                If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



                However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



                How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



                Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



                If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



                However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 20 at 5:01









                Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

                1,367519




                1,367519



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45849%2fis-it-ok-to-train-the-model-only-on-the-interested-part-of-the-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_13_input to have shape (3, 150, 150) but got array with shape (150, 150, 3)2019 Community Moderator ElectionError when checking : expected dense_1_input to have shape (None, 5) but got array with shape (200, 1)Error 'Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:'ValueError: Error when checking input: expected lstm_41_input to have 3 dimensions, but got array with shape (40000,100)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_2 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (0,)Keras exception: ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv2d_1_input to have shape (150, 150, 3) but got array with shape (256, 256, 3)Steps taking too long to completewhen checking input: expected dense_1_input to have shape (13328,) but got array with shape (317,)ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_3 to have shape (None, 1) but got array with shape (7715, 40000)Keras exception: Error when checking input: expected dense_input to have shape (2,) but got array with shape (1,)

                    Ружовы пелікан Змест Знешні выгляд | Пашырэнне | Асаблівасці біялогіі | Літаратура | НавігацыяДагледжаная версіяправерана1 зменаДагледжаная версіяправерана1 змена/ 22697590 Сістэматыкана ВіківідахВыявына Вікісховішчы174693363011049382

                    Illegal assignment from SObject to ContactFetching String, Id from Map - Illegal Assignment Id to Field / ObjectError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to BooleanError: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectError on Test Class - System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectRemote action problemDML requires SObject or SObject list type error“Illegal assignment from List to List”Test Class Fail: Batch Class: System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObjectMapping to a user'List has no rows for assignment to SObject' Mystery