Is it ok to train the model only on the interested part of the data?Necessity of balancing positive/negative examples in binary classification machine learning?Is it good to remove outliers from the dataset?How to evaluate data capability to train a model?Train, test split of unbalanced dataset classificationIs it always better to use the whole dataset to train the final model?samples for different objects with unique labelsHow to correctly perform data sampling for train/test split in multi-label dataset?Is it correct to use non-target values of test set to engineer new features for train set?learning curve SklearnCan I use the test dataset to select a model?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

Stack Interview Code methods made from class Node and Smart Pointers

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

How to get directions in deep space?

What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?

Review your own paper in Mathematics

C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexpr

What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?

How does electrical safety system work on ISS?

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

What is the difference between lands and mana?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

Showing a sum is positive

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

How can I write humor as character trait?

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile



Is it ok to train the model only on the interested part of the data?


Necessity of balancing positive/negative examples in binary classification machine learning?Is it good to remove outliers from the dataset?How to evaluate data capability to train a model?Train, test split of unbalanced dataset classificationIs it always better to use the whole dataset to train the final model?samples for different objects with unique labelsHow to correctly perform data sampling for train/test split in multi-label dataset?Is it correct to use non-target values of test set to engineer new features for train set?learning curve SklearnCan I use the test dataset to select a model?













1












$begingroup$


Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

What are the pros and cons of both approaches?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.



















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

    The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

    Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

    What are the pros and cons of both approaches?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$




    bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

      The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

      Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

      What are the pros and cons of both approaches?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let's say I have a dataset where one feature is Car type : say 'A', 'B' and 'C'.

      The test set consists of samples where car type is 'A' always.

      Therefore, should I train my model only on the subset where Car type is 'A' or on the whole training set?

      What are the pros and cons of both approaches?







      machine-learning dataset training






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 20 at 4:31









      idpd15idpd15

      1314




      1314





      bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 7 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



          How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



          Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



          If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



          However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "557"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45849%2fis-it-ok-to-train-the-model-only-on-the-interested-part-of-the-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



            How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



            Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



            If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



            However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



              How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



              Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



              If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



              However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



                How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



                Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



                If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



                However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I think it depends on your understanding of the data set.



                How similar are car $A$ with car $B$ and car $C$?



                Is car $A$ an electric car and car $B$ and car $C$ running on gas? Is one of them a self driving car and the others are not?



                If you are training them together, I think there is an implicit assumption that their behavior are similar and you want to take advantage of that, in particular, perhaps you do not have sufficient data from car $A$ and you are hoping that you can use data from car $B$ and car $C$ to help you.



                However, if car $B$ and car $C$ are very distinct and you are trying to predict accident or car failure, adding it to them might not help that much. If the design of cars are very distinct, they might not cause accident due to the same features.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 20 at 5:01









                Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

                1,367519




                1,367519



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45849%2fis-it-ok-to-train-the-model-only-on-the-interested-part-of-the-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

                    Partai Komunis Tiongkok Daftar isi Kepemimpinan | Pranala luar | Referensi | Menu navigasidiperiksa1 perubahan tertundacpc.people.com.cnSitus resmiSurat kabar resmi"Why the Communist Party is alive, well and flourishing in China"0307-1235"Full text of Constitution of Communist Party of China"smengembangkannyas

                    ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result