What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the algebra map of the ultrafilter monad continuous?Is there a way to make tangent bundle a monad?Coproducts and pushouts of Boolean algebras and Heyting algebrasProof of theorems in the field of banach-and $c^*$-algebras in a categorial languageEpimorphisms of locally compact spacesThis is just the Eilenberg-Moore category, right?Which spaces can be used as “test spaces” for the Stone-Čech compactification?What is the opposite category of $operatornameTop$?Finitely presentable objects and the Kleisli categoryultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topologyMorita theory for algebras for a monad $T$

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Chinese Seal on silk painting - what does it mean?

Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?

ArcGIS Pro Python arcpy.CreatePersonalGDB_management

Why should I vote and accept answers?

Trademark violation for app?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?

Why is my ESD wriststrap failing with nitrile gloves on?

What is a fractional matching?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Would the Life Transference spell be unbalanced if it ignored resistance and immunity?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Performance gap between vector<bool> and array

What is the font for "b" letter?

Do any jurisdictions seriously consider reclassifying social media websites as publishers?

Most bit efficient text communication method?



What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the algebra map of the ultrafilter monad continuous?Is there a way to make tangent bundle a monad?Coproducts and pushouts of Boolean algebras and Heyting algebrasProof of theorems in the field of banach-and $c^*$-algebras in a categorial languageEpimorphisms of locally compact spacesThis is just the Eilenberg-Moore category, right?Which spaces can be used as “test spaces” for the Stone-Čech compactification?What is the opposite category of $operatornameTop$?Finitely presentable objects and the Kleisli categoryultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topologyMorita theory for algebras for a monad $T$










8












$begingroup$


It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    8












    $begingroup$


    It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



    I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      8












      8








      8





      $begingroup$


      It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



      I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



      I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.







      general-topology category-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      Malice VidrineMalice Vidrine

      6,34621123




      6,34621123




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



          Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Malice Vidrine
            5 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



          Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



          It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



          In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



          So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



          Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




          Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



          Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192728%2fwhat-is-the-topology-associated-with-the-algebras-for-the-ultrafilter-monad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6












            $begingroup$

            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              5 hours ago















            6












            $begingroup$

            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              5 hours ago













            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            Alex KruckmanAlex Kruckman

            28.8k32758




            28.8k32758











            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              5 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              5 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Malice Vidrine
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Malice Vidrine
            5 hours ago











            2












            $begingroup$

            The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



            Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



            It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



            In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



            So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



            Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




            Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



            Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



              Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



              It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



              In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



              So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



              Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




              Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



              Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



                Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



                It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



                In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



                So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



                Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




                Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



                Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



                Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



                It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



                In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



                So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



                Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




                Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



                Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago

























                answered 4 hours ago









                Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                193k14221352




                193k14221352



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192728%2fwhat-is-the-topology-associated-with-the-algebras-for-the-ultrafilter-monad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Францішак Багушэвіч Змест Сям'я | Біяграфія | Творчасць | Мова Багушэвіча | Ацэнкі дзейнасці | Цікавыя факты | Спадчына | Выбраная бібліяграфія | Ушанаванне памяці | У філатэліі | Зноскі | Літаратура | Спасылкі | НавігацыяЛяхоўскі У. Рупіўся дзеля Бога і людзей: Жыццёвы шлях Лявона Вітан-Дубейкаўскага // Вольскі і Памідораў з песняй пра немца Адвакат, паэт, народны заступнік Ашмянскі веснікВ Минске появится площадь Богушевича и улица Сырокомли, Белорусская деловая газета, 19 июля 2001 г.Айцец беларускай нацыянальнай ідэі паўстаў у бронзе Сяргей Аляксандравіч Адашкевіч (1918, Мінск). 80-я гады. Бюст «Францішак Багушэвіч».Яўген Мікалаевіч Ціхановіч. «Партрэт Францішка Багушэвіча»Мікола Мікалаевіч Купава. «Партрэт зачынальніка новай беларускай літаратуры Францішка Багушэвіча»Уладзімір Іванавіч Мелехаў. На помніку «Змагарам за родную мову» Барэльеф «Францішак Багушэвіч»Памяць пра Багушэвіча на Віленшчыне Страчаная сталіца. Беларускія шыльды на вуліцах Вільні«Krynica». Ideologia i przywódcy białoruskiego katolicyzmuФранцішак БагушэвічТворы на knihi.comТворы Францішка Багушэвіча на bellib.byСодаль Уладзімір. Францішак Багушэвіч на Лідчыне;Луцкевіч Антон. Жыцьцё і творчасьць Фр. Багушэвіча ў успамінах ягоных сучасьнікаў // Запісы Беларускага Навуковага таварыства. Вільня, 1938. Сшытак 1. С. 16-34.Большая российская1188761710000 0000 5537 633Xn9209310021619551927869394п

                    Беларусь Змест Назва Гісторыя Геаграфія Сімволіка Дзяржаўны лад Палітычныя партыі Міжнароднае становішча і знешняя палітыка Адміністрацыйны падзел Насельніцтва Эканоміка Культура і грамадства Сацыяльная сфера Узброеныя сілы Заўвагі Літаратура Спасылкі НавігацыяHGЯOiТоп-2011 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2013 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2016 г. (па версіі ej.by)Топ-2017 г. (па версіі ej.by)Нацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьШчыльнасць насельніцтва па краінахhttp://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2011/09/16/ic_articles_116_175144/А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Спробы засялення краю неандэртальскім чалавекам.І ў Менску былі мамантыА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіГ. Штыхаў. Балты і славяне ў VI—VIII стст.М. Клімаў. Полацкае княства ў IX—XI стст.Г. Штыхаў, В. Ляўко. Палітычная гісторыя Полацкай зямліГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахГ. Штыхаў. Дзяржаўны лад у землях-княствахБеларускія землі ў складзе Вялікага Княства ЛітоўскагаЛюблінская унія 1569 г."The Early Stages of Independence"Zapomniane prawdy25 гадоў таму было аб'яўлена, што Язэп Пілсудскі — беларус (фота)Наша вадаДакументы ЧАЭС: Забруджванне тэрыторыі Беларусі « ЧАЭС Зона адчужэнняСведения о политических партиях, зарегистрированных в Республике Беларусь // Министерство юстиции Республики БеларусьСтатыстычны бюлетэнь „Полаўзроставая структура насельніцтва Рэспублікі Беларусь на 1 студзеня 2012 года і сярэднегадовая колькасць насельніцтва за 2011 год“Индекс человеческого развития Беларуси — не было бы нижеБеларусь занимает первое место в СНГ по индексу развития с учетом гендерного факцёраНацыянальны статыстычны камітэт Рэспублікі БеларусьКанстытуцыя РБ. Артыкул 17Трансфармацыйныя задачы БеларусіВыйсце з крызісу — далейшае рэфармаванне Беларускі рубель — сусветны лідар па дэвальвацыяхПра змену коштаў у кастрычніку 2011 г.Бядней за беларусаў у СНД толькі таджыкіСярэдні заробак у верасні дасягнуў 2,26 мільёна рублёўЭканомікаГаласуем за ТОП-100 беларускай прозыСучасныя беларускія мастакіАрхитектура Беларуси BELARUS.BYА. Каханоўскі. Культура Беларусі ўсярэдзіне XVII—XVIII ст.Анталогія беларускай народнай песні, гуказапісы спеваўБеларускія Музычныя IнструментыБеларускі рок, які мы страцілі. Топ-10 гуртоў«Мясцовы час» — нязгаслая легенда беларускай рок-музыкіСЯРГЕЙ БУДКІН. МЫ НЯ ЗНАЕМ СВАЁЙ МУЗЫКІМ. А. Каладзінскі. НАРОДНЫ ТЭАТРМагнацкія культурныя цэнтрыПублічная дыскусія «Беларуская новая пьеса: без беларускай мовы ці беларуская?»Беларускія драматургі па-ранейшаму лепш ставяцца за мяжой, чым на радзіме«Працэс незалежнага кіно пайшоў, і дзяржаву турбуе яго непадкантрольнасць»Беларускія філосафы ў пошуках прасторыВсе идём в библиотекуАрхіваванаАб Нацыянальнай праграме даследавання і выкарыстання касмічнай прасторы ў мірных мэтах на 2008—2012 гадыУ космас — разам.У суседнім з Барысаўскім раёне пабудуюць Камандна-вымяральны пунктСвяты і абрады беларусаў«Мірныя бульбашы з малой краіны» — 5 непраўдзівых стэрэатыпаў пра БеларусьМ. Раманюк. Беларускае народнае адзеннеУ Беларусі скарачаецца колькасць злачынстваўЛукашэнка незадаволены мінскімі ўладамі Крадзяжы складаюць у Мінску каля 70% злачынстваў Узровень злачыннасці ў Мінскай вобласці — адзін з самых высокіх у краіне Генпракуратура аналізуе стан са злачыннасцю ў Беларусі па каэфіцыенце злачыннасці У Беларусі стабілізавалася крымінагеннае становішча, лічыць генпракурорЗамежнікі сталі здзяйсняць у Беларусі больш злачынстваўМУС Беларусі турбуе рост рэцыдыўнай злачыннасціЯ з ЖЭСа. Дазволіце вас абкрасці! Рэйтынг усіх службаў і падраздзяленняў ГУУС Мінгарвыканкама вырасАб КДБ РБГісторыя Аператыўна-аналітычнага цэнтра РБГісторыя ДКФРТаможняagentura.ruБеларусьBelarus.by — Афіцыйны сайт Рэспублікі БеларусьСайт урада БеларусіRadzima.org — Збор архітэктурных помнікаў, гісторыя Беларусі«Глобус Беларуси»Гербы и флаги БеларусиАсаблівасці каменнага веку на БеларусіА. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў. Старажытны каменны век (палеаліт). Першапачатковае засяленне тэрыторыіУ. Ксяндзоў. Сярэдні каменны век (мезаліт). Засяленне краю плямёнамі паляўнічых, рыбакоў і збіральнікаўА. Калечыц, М. Чарняўскі. Плямёны на тэрыторыі Беларусі ў новым каменным веку (неаліце)А. Калечыц, У. Ксяндзоў, М. Чарняўскі. Гаспадарчыя заняткі ў каменным векуЭ. Зайкоўскі. Духоўная культура ў каменным векуАсаблівасці бронзавага веку на БеларусіФарміраванне супольнасцей ранняга перыяду бронзавага векуФотографии БеларусиРоля беларускіх зямель ва ўтварэнні і ўмацаванні ВКЛВ. Фадзеева. З гісторыі развіцця беларускай народнай вышыўкіDMOZGran catalanaБольшая российскаяBritannica (анлайн)Швейцарскі гістарычны15325917611952699xDA123282154079143-90000 0001 2171 2080n9112870100577502ge128882171858027501086026362074122714179пппппп

                    ValueError: Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples, but n_samples = 1, n_neighbors = 6 (SMOTE) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan SMOTE be applied over sequence of words (sentences)?ValueError when doing validation with random forestsSMOTE and multi class oversamplingLogic behind SMOTE-NC?ValueError: Error when checking target: expected dense_1 to have shape (7,) but got array with shape (1,)SmoteBoost: Should SMOTE be ran individually for each iteration/tree in the boosting?solving multi-class imbalance classification using smote and OSSUsing SMOTE for Synthetic Data generation to improve performance on unbalanced dataproblem of entry format for a simple model in KerasSVM SMOTE fit_resample() function runs forever with no result