Hfrxdjt

Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

How to write the following sign?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

What was the first language to use conditional keywords?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

How could we fake a moon landing now?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

Selecting user stories during sprint planning

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

What are the diatonic extended chords of C major?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

How does Python know the values already stored in its memory?

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

Is a ledger board required if the side of my house is wood?

Dataset of extremely low-dimensional images for PCA

1

$begingroup$

I am looking for a public data-set of images that differ from each other only slightly, so that after applying PCA they can be reconstructed with a small error from very few PCA coefficients. It can be any type of images, the purpose is only to demonstrate an extreme example of PCA.

machine-learning dataset pca

share|improve this question

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

$endgroup$

bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 23 mins ago

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

I am looking for a public data-set of images that differ from each other only slightly, so that after applying PCA they can be reconstructed with a small error from very few PCA coefficients. It can be any type of images, the purpose is only to demonstrate an extreme example of PCA.

machine-learning dataset pca

share|improve this question

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

$endgroup$

bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 23 mins ago

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I am looking for a public data-set of images that differ from each other only slightly, so that after applying PCA they can be reconstructed with a small error from very few PCA coefficients. It can be any type of images, the purpose is only to demonstrate an extreme example of PCA.

machine-learning dataset pca

share|improve this question

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

share|improve this question

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

edited Jan 23 '18 at 12:27

Vaalizaadeh

7,61562265

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

asked Jan 23 '18 at 9:56

elliotpelliotp

111

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

0

$begingroup$

Actually in your case I guess the pure images are not that important. The features that you extract from them are important because if your feature space is constructed base on intensity of images at different picture elements, pixels, then you will need so many coefficients. As an easy solution, use MNIST digits and use shape features to extract features from the images of numbers. You can use plausible number of features and then use PCA for the data that is in the new feature space that you have just constructed. In this case smaller number of coefficients will be needed if the features are fine.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 23 '18 at 11:22

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thanks but as I said, I want to demonstrate PCA for the actual pixels of images.
  $endgroup$
  – elliotp
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:16
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @elliotp You can use mnist to do so as well but I'm not sure how many coefficients will suffice for you purpose. I guess MNIST suites for your task because most of the numbers are centered, consequently center pixels with each other and marginal pixels with each other will have high correlation which may cause first principal components have great eigenvalues.
  $endgroup$
  – Vaalizaadeh
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:26
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @elliotp also as a suggestion, I recommend you to pick sample of images of two different labels and plot the three eigenvalues with the greatest amounts.
  $endgroup$
  – Vaalizaadeh
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:48
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26948%2fdataset-of-extremely-low-dimensional-images-for-pca%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

0

$begingroup$

Actually in your case I guess the pure images are not that important. The features that you extract from them are important because if your feature space is constructed base on intensity of images at different picture elements, pixels, then you will need so many coefficients. As an easy solution, use MNIST digits and use shape features to extract features from the images of numbers. You can use plausible number of features and then use PCA for the data that is in the new feature space that you have just constructed. In this case smaller number of coefficients will be needed if the features are fine.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 23 '18 at 11:22

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thanks but as I said, I want to demonstrate PCA for the actual pixels of images.
  $endgroup$
  – elliotp
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:16
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @elliotp You can use mnist to do so as well but I'm not sure how many coefficients will suffice for you purpose. I guess MNIST suites for your task because most of the numbers are centered, consequently center pixels with each other and marginal pixels with each other will have high correlation which may cause first principal components have great eigenvalues.
  $endgroup$
  – Vaalizaadeh
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:26
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @elliotp also as a suggestion, I recommend you to pick sample of images of two different labels and plot the three eigenvalues with the greatest amounts.
  $endgroup$
  – Vaalizaadeh
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:48
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

Actually in your case I guess the pure images are not that important. The features that you extract from them are important because if your feature space is constructed base on intensity of images at different picture elements, pixels, then you will need so many coefficients. As an easy solution, use MNIST digits and use shape features to extract features from the images of numbers. You can use plausible number of features and then use PCA for the data that is in the new feature space that you have just constructed. In this case smaller number of coefficients will be needed if the features are fine.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 23 '18 at 11:22

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thanks but as I said, I want to demonstrate PCA for the actual pixels of images.
  $endgroup$
  – elliotp
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:16
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @elliotp You can use mnist to do so as well but I'm not sure how many coefficients will suffice for you purpose. I guess MNIST suites for your task because most of the numbers are centered, consequently center pixels with each other and marginal pixels with each other will have high correlation which may cause first principal components have great eigenvalues.
  $endgroup$
  – Vaalizaadeh
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:26
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @elliotp also as a suggestion, I recommend you to pick sample of images of two different labels and plot the three eigenvalues with the greatest amounts.
  $endgroup$
  – Vaalizaadeh
  Jan 23 '18 at 12:48
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Actually in your case I guess the pure images are not that important. The features that you extract from them are important because if your feature space is constructed base on intensity of images at different picture elements, pixels, then you will need so many coefficients. As an easy solution, use MNIST digits and use shape features to extract features from the images of numbers. You can use plausible number of features and then use PCA for the data that is in the new feature space that you have just constructed. In this case smaller number of coefficients will be needed if the features are fine.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 23 '18 at 11:22

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 23 '18 at 11:22

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265

answered Jan 23 '18 at 11:17

VaalizaadehVaalizaadeh

7,61562265