Hfrxdjt

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

Is there a conventional notation or name for the slip angle?

Using a siddur to Daven from in a seforim store

Is possible to search in vim history?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?

Longest common substring in linear time

When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line?

Is it possible to use .desktop files to open local pdf files on specific pages with a browser?

How do I extrude a face to a single vertex

Greco-Roman egalitarianism

What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?

ArcGIS not connecting to PostgreSQL db with all upper-case name

THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?

Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?

Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ

Diode in opposite direction?

Aligning individual characters/glyphs like a monospace font

Greatest common substring

Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

How do I repair my stair bannister?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Using a siddur to Daven from in a seforim store

1

There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.

1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?




2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?

halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages

share|improve this question

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?
  
  – Double AA♦
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.
  
  – Al Berko
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko
  
  – Moshe
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.
  
  – Al Berko
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

1

There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.

1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?




2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?

halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages

share|improve this question

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?
  
  – Double AA♦
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.
  
  – Al Berko
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko
  
  – Moshe
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.
  
  – Al Berko
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.

1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?




2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?

halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages

share|improve this question

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

share|improve this question

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

share|improve this question

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

edited 5 hours ago

Al Berko

6,2581529

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

asked 8 hours ago

MosheMoshe

45512

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

5

No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.
  
  – Al Berko
  5 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.
  
  – DonielF
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.
  
  – DonielF
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 3 more comments

5

No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.
  
  – Al Berko
  5 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.
  
  – DonielF
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.
  
  – DonielF
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 3 more comments

5

No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.
  
  – Al Berko
  5 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.
  
  – DonielF
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"
  
  – Al Berko
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.
  
  – DonielF
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 3 more comments

No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417

answered 6 hours ago

chortkov2chortkov2

98417